Skip over navigation

Colloquia

2009

 
Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 211 Dickinson Hall, 4:30 p.m.
Nathaniel Comfort

Johns Hopkins University, Program in the History of Science, Medicine and Technology
 

“Human Genetics in the Atomic Age; Or, How We Learned to Start Worrying and Love Mutation”  
Abstract
The second world war gave academic human genetics a reason for being. When the bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mutation, long an area of active research in animal and plant genetics, suddenly acquired political and cultural valence. The figurehead in this was Hermann Joseph Muller. The 1946 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went to Muller in recognition of his 1927 proof of X ray induced mutation. The following year, Herluf Strandskov, a young but rather old-school twin geneticist from the University of Chicago, easily induced Muller to help establish a professional society for human genetics. In 1948, the American Society of Human Genetics held its first meeting; Muller was elected the first president and figurehead-in-chief; the officers (and subsequent presidents) were all sympathetic to or active in the genetic improvement of mankind. Muller’s presidential address was “Our load of mutations.” The eugenic message of this article has been noted, by Diane Paul among others. What I do in this paper is connect the dots, showing how his forum for this paper rose out of Cold War fears of mutation; illustrating how appropriate it was that Muller used the leadership of the ASHG as a bully pulpit; and suggesting that this legacy strongly colored the formative years of the society.
 

 
 
Wednesday, December 2, 2009 - 211 Dickinson Hall, 4:30 p.m.
Peder Anker

New York University, The Gallatin School of Individualized Study


"Spaceship Earth"
Abstract
Why did scientists and lay people alike in the 1970s talk about the Earth in terms of a Spaceship? And in what way did this frame the environmental debate? With a point of departure in the famous earthrise image, this lecture reviews the history of “spaceship earth”. The photo came to represent a dream of a globe in ecological harmony, yet it was taken by a crew of astronauts sent out in space to demonstrate the superiority of the United States in a world divided by Cold War tensions. Spaceship earth was not a vague analogy or metaphor, but that it reflected instead efforts to build a closed ecosystem within the spaceship in order to secure the health of astronauts. In other words, the Earth was literally understood as being construed as the spaceship and the environmental havoc was caused by humans not behaving like astronauts. Environmental ethics became an issue of trying to live like astronauts by adapting space technologies such as bio-toilets, solar cells, recycling, and energy-saving devices. Technology, terminology, and methodology developed for spaceships became tools for solving environmental problems onboard Spaceship Earth. Spaceships came to represent the rational, orderly, and wisely managed contrast to the irrational, disorderly, and ill managed environments on Earth.


 

Wednesday, February 3, 2010 – 211 Dickinson Hall, 4:30PM
Rutgers University, School of Arts and Social Sciences
co-sponsored by Program in History of Science, and the Colonial Americas Workshops (CAW)
 
"Divers Things: Collecting the World Under Water."
Abstract
What did it mean to go under water in the early modern era? “I do not pretend to have visited the bottom of the sea,” wrote Robert Boyle in 1670, but that did not stop him from writing at length about the depths. Indeed, the same can be said of Jules Verne. This paper examines late seventeenth-century English travelers and natural philosophers' accounts of the submarine, in a period when diving projects proliferated due to dramatic new fortunes being made in Caribbean salvage. It begins by examining the significance of aquatic objects and perceptions of the deep in a providential framework that united the biblical Flood with contemporary natural disasters such as the 1692 earthquake in Port Royal, Jamaica. It argues that in addition to exemplifying connoisseurial fetishization of transformations between nature and art, collections of aquatic curiosities constituted a providential imperial chorography of the submarine. The paper goes on to situate collectors’ power to transform nature into art in relation to their ability to coerce the extraordinary capacities of Asian, American and enslaved African divers. Finally, it explores the shift from self-extension through human surrogates to the construction of prosthetic devices, in particular diving bells, linking programs of submarine knowledge at the Royal Society to entrepreneurial salvage projects, and attempts to colonize the depths by transforming the underwater world into dry land.