|

This photo is
copyright protected and is the property of
Associate Press. Any use with prior written
permission from AP/WIDE WORLD PHOTOS is prohibited.
Any violation will be subject to legal action.
|
|
On December 9, the New York Times reported as
follows:
"The White House opened its formal defense of
President Clinton Tuesday, addressing in greater
detail than before the facts and issues of the
impeachment case against Clinton. . . .
"Sean Wilentz, professor of
American history at Princeton, angered several
Republican members of the committee by warning them
that what he characterized as an unjustified vote
to impeach Clinton would bring them the opprobrium
of history. (Photo courtesy of Associated
Press)
"Wilentz argued that Clinton's
alleged offenses -- even if all were proven true --
do not warrant impeachment.
"'If you believe they do rise to
that level, you will vote for impeachment and take
your risk at going down in history with the zealots
and the fanatics,' Wilentz said. 'If you understand
that the charges do not rise to the level of
impeachment, or if you are at all unsure, and yet
you vote in favor of impeachment anyway for some
other reason, history will track you down and
condemn you for your cravenness.'"
More
. . .
The complete text of the panel's testimony
before the House Judiciary Committee is available.
(41,650
words, 270 K)
|
|