Princeton
Weekly Bulletin
February 28, 2000
Vol. 89, No. 18
[<] [>] [archive]


Page one news and features
Autonomous yet coordinated
Three decades as music librarian
Fitness center users sweat in style
Dream brings together actors, orchestra, singers
Y2Kupid works for graduate students
Economist estimates payoff of elite colleges

People
Retirements
More people items...

Nassau Notes
Arts
Speakers
• Notices

Sections
Calendar
Employment

 


Economist estimates payoff of elite colleges

By Ken Howard

Going to an academically elite college does not necessarily boost your earnings potential, according to a study by Alan Krueger, Thoman and Bendheim Professor in Economics and Public Affairs.

In a working paper on "Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College," Krueger found that a school's selectivity, as measured by matriculants' average SAT scores, does not correlate with students' later income, once the abilities of the students upon entering college are taken into account.

This finding challenges previous studies positively linking earnings to a college's prestige. The researchers did find that for a subset of students -- those from a financially disadvantaged background -- an elite education brings greater financial rewards.

College and Beyond database

The paper, coauthored with researcher Stacy Berg Dale of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, was published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. It examines data from the College and Beyond database developed by the Mellon Foundation, which tracks 14,239 adults who entered 30 colleges in 1976. Krueger and Dale correlated 1995 income of those adults with the SAT scores of the colleges they attended. They also examined data on 2,127 workers who attended a broader set of colleges using the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972.

In both data sets, Krueger and Dale, like other researchers, found that students who attend more selective colleges tend to earn higher salaries later on than those who attend less selective colleges. However, Krueger and Dale looked not only at the schools those students attended but also where they were accepted and rejected. They found that where a student applies is a more powerful predictor of future earnings success than which school he or she attends.

Says Krueger, "It appears that student ambition, as reflected in the quality of the school to which he or she applies, is a better predictor of earning success than what college they ultimately choose or which college chooses them." The researchers refer to this phenomena as the "Steven Spielberg Effect," citing the experience of the filmmaker who was rejected by both USC and UCLA film schools and ended up attending a less prestigious program but later achieving tremendous success.

Krueger and Dale found a different pattern for students from financially disadvantaged backgrounds, whose earning power as a group was improved by going to a more academically elite college. "These findings suggest that colleges that provide more tuition assistance to children from lower income families are pursuing the right path, since we find that these are students who benefit the most from attending highly selective schools," Krueger observed.

The working paper is available online at http://papers.nber.org/papers/W7322.


top