Physicists reveal findings that help explain why matter exists


Steven Schultz

Princeton physicists are among the leaders of two international research collaborations that are answering one of the most fundamental questions in the universe: Why does matter exist?

Stewart Smith, the Class of 1909 Professor of Physics, is leading an international collaboration of scientists who are looking for differences between the behavior of matter and antimatter particles. The experiment is being conducted at the Stanford Linear Accelerator in California. Here, Smith stands in front of the instrument that detects subatomic particles in the aftermath of collisions. A significant amount of the design and construction of the detector components took place at Princeton.

 

 

They are uncovering a rare but critical loss of symmetry in the behavior of subatomic particles. Physicists are counting on this asymmetry to explain why matter and antimatter particles did not cancel each other after they were created in the Big Bang.

One of the collaborations, based at the Stanford Linear Accelerator, announced this summer that it had confirmed the asymmetric behavior in subatomic particles called B mesons. The other group, based at the KEK particle accelerator near Tokyo, Japan, reported a similar result a few weeks later.

They are the first new examples since the asymmetry, referred to as charge-parity, or CP, violation, was discovered in 1964 by Princeton physicist Val Fitch and James Cronin of the University of Chicago. That discovery, in a different particle called the K meson, earned Fitch and Cronin the 1980 Nobel Prize in physics.

"After 37 years of searching for further examples of CP violation, physicists now know that there are at least two kinds of subatomic particles that exhibit this puzzling phenomenon, thought to be responsible for the great preponderance of matter in the universe," said Princeton physicist Stewart Smith, a spokesperson for the Stanford collaboration.

"The two groups disagree somewhat on how large the violation is, but the difference can probably be explained as a statistical fluctuation," said Daniel Marlow, a Princeton professor of physics who is one of the leaders of the Japanese experiment.

Shortly after the Fitch-Cronin discovery, Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov found that CP violation along with other recently discovered phenomena could explain the existence of matter in the universe, which started with equal numbers of matter and antimatter particles.

"Things in the universe tend to be symmetric," said Marlow. "So why is it that the universe consists mainly of matter?"

When a particle of matter and its antimatter counterpart meet, they annihilate each other, leaving nothing but light. Although every particle has an antimatter equivalent, the balance apparently shifted over time. "If it weren't the case we wouldn't exist," said Marlow. "The last person you want to meet is your antimatter counterpart."

Fundamental concepts

The existence of CP violation is important to physicists not just because of its cosmological implications. The original discovery by Fitch and Cronin required physicists to completely rethink several fundamental concepts, including the mistaken conviction that all physical laws would apply equally well with time running forward or backward.

Today, CP violation is a key element in the currently accepted Standard Model of Particle Physics, which describes the interactions of nearly all particles and forces. Indeed, the equations of the standard model predict the existence of CP violation in B mesons. To have found otherwise would have required another fundamental rethinking of physical laws.

In searching for further examples, said Fitch, "There has always been this question, 'Is it going to be something that fits in with what happens in the K system or is it totally new?'"

The result that emerged from Stanford was very much in line with the predictions of the standard model, while the KEK result showed somewhat more CP violation than predicted. Fitch said it has been good to see his 1964 result incorporated into standard physics. "It was very satisfying for that to happen, to find that it was not an effect standing alone," he said.

Yet physicists actually have a touch of disappointment about the Stanford results. As it stands, the standard model does not have enough CP violation to account for the great preponderance of matter in the universe, Smith said. Physicists are looking for a result that contradicts their current understanding and points to new areas of research.

Both experiments still may produce such contradicting results. As the accelerators pour out more data, scientists will be able to conduct more extensive experiments that involve rarer phenomena. "The standard model passes this test, but it is not out of the woods," said Smith.

The CP violation discoveries are the result of giant research programs. Smith is the leader of a collaboration that includes 600 scientists and engineers from around the world. The project began in 1993 with a $200 million upgrade to the Stanford Linear Accelerator and the construction of a $100 million detector that could record the minute and subtle events. The KEK experiment, which started at about the same time, involves nearly 300 people from 45 institutions.

Technicians in Princeton's Elementary Particles shop contributed significantly to the building of the detectors for both experiments.
 

top


November 5, 2001
Vol. 91, No. 8
previous   archives   next

Contents

 Page one
University responds to safety concerns
Spergel wins 'genius grant'
From Paisley to Princeton

People
Wei to resign as engineering dean
Top postdoctoral scholars bring expertise to campus
Rich pickin's: Bluegrass legend provides ample fodder for biography
Spotlight

Research
Physicists reveal findings that help explain why matter exists
Scholars to explore religion and bioethics

Sections
• By the numbers:
Princeton University Alumni Association
Nassau Notes
Calendar of events


The Bulletin is published weekly during the academic year, except during University breaks and exam weeks, by the Office of Communications, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. Permission is given to adapt, reprint or excerpt material from the Bulletin for use in other media.


Deadline. In general, the copy deadline for each issue is the Friday 10 days in advance of the Monday cover date. The deadline for the Bulletin that covers Nov. 19&endash;Dec. 2 is Friday, Nov. 9. A complete publication schedule is available at deadlines or by calling (609) 258-3601.


Subscriptions. The Bulletin is distributed free to faculty, staff and students. Others may subscribe to the Bulletin for $28 for the academic year (half price for current Princeton parents and people over 65). Send a check to Office of Communications, Stanhope Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.


Editor: Ruth Stevens
Calendar editor: Carolyn Geller
Staff writers: Jennifer Greenstein Altmann, Steven Schultz
Contributing writers: Marilyn Marks
Photographer: Denise Applewhite
Design: Mahlon Lovett, Laurel Masten Cantor
Web edition: Mahlon Lovett