Alien and Sedition Acts

related topics
{law, state, case}
{government, party, election}
{war, force, army}
{work, book, publish}
{area, community, home}

The Alien and Sedition Acts were four bills passed in 1798 by the Federalists in the 5th United States Congress during an undeclared naval war with France, later known as the Quasi-War. They were signed into law by President John Adams. Proponents claimed the acts were designed to protect the United States from alien citizens of enemy powers and to prevent seditious attacks from weakening the government. The Democratic-Republicans, like later historians, denominated them as being both unconstitutional and designed to stifle criticism of the administration, and as infringing on the right of the states to act in these areas. They became a major political issue in the elections of 1798 and 1800.



There were actually four separate laws making up what is commonly referred to as the "Alien and Sedition Acts"


Vice President Thomas Jefferson denounced the Sedition Act as invalid and a violation of the First Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights, which protected the right of free speech, and a violation of the Tenth Amendment,[1][2] arguing that:

Jefferson more strongly argued the Federal Government had overstepped its limits in the Alien and Sedition Acts by attempting to exercise unjust powers. Virginia and Kentucky passed resolutions (secretly penned by Jefferson and James Madison) openly denouncing the acts; Federalist-dominated state legislatures rejected Jefferson's position through resolutions either supporting the Acts or denying the ability of Virginia and Kentucky to circumvent them.[3]

The judicial redress for unconstitutional legislation under the doctrine of judicial review was not established until Marbury v. Madison in 1803. The Supreme Court in 1798 was composed entirely of Federalists, all appointed by Washington. Many of them, particularly Associate Justice Samuel Chase, were openly hostile to the Federalists' opponents. The Alien and Sedition Acts were not appealed to the Supreme Court for review, although individual Supreme Court Justices, sitting in circuit, heard many of the cases prosecuting opponents of the Federalists.

Full article ▸

related documents
Railway Labor Act
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
County Court
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Napoleonic code
Civil and political rights
Gibbons v. Ogden
Warren Commission
Court of Appeal of England and Wales
Ex parte Merryman
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Proximate cause
Appellate court
League of Nations mandate
Letter of marque
Antarctic Treaty System
Adrian Lamo
Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Communications Decency Act
Inquest (England and Wales)
Procedural justice
Dispute resolution
Court of First Instance
Leading question
John Allen Muhammad