Atomic weight

related topics
{acid, form, water}
{math, energy, light}
{rate, high, increase}
{theory, work, human}
{style, bgcolor, rowspan}

Atomic weight (symbol: Ar) is a dimensionless physical quantity, the ratio of the average mass of atoms of an element (from a given source) to 1/12 of the mass of an atom of carbon-12 (known as the unified atomic mass unit).[1][2] The term is usually used, without further qualification, to refer to the standard atomic weights published at regular intervals by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)[3][4] and which are intended to be applicable to normal laboratory materials. These standard atomic weights are reprinted in a wide variety of textbooks, commercial catalogues, wallcharts etc., and in the table below. The fact "relative atomic mass of the element" may also be used to describe this physical quantity, and indeed the continued use of the term "atomic weight" has attracted considerable controversy since at least the 1960s[5] (see below).

Atomic weights, unlike atomic masses (the masses of individual atoms), are not physical constants and vary from sample to sample. Nevertheless, they are sufficiently constant in "normal" samples to be of fundamental importance in chemistry.

Contents

Definition

The IUPAC definition[1] of atomic weight is:

An atomic weight (relative atomic mass) of an element from a specified source is the ratio of the average mass per atom of the element to 1/12 of the mass of an atom of 12C.

The definition deliberately specifies "An atomic weight…", as an element will have different atomic weights depending on the source. For example, boron from Turkey has a lower atomic weight than boron from California, because of its different isotopic composition.[6][7] Nevertheless, given the cost and difficulty of isotope analysis, it is usual to use the tabulated values of standard atomic weights which are ubiquitous in chemical laboratories.

Naming controversy

The use of the name "atomic weight" has attracted a great deal of controversy among scientists.[5] Objectors to the name usually prefer the term "relative atomic mass" (not to be confused with atomic mass). The basic objection is that atomic weight is not a weight, that is the force exerted on an object in a gravitational field, measured in units of force such as the newton.

Full article ▸

related documents
Dielectric strength
Radiation
Molar volume
Unconventional superconductor
Stellar nucleosynthesis
Polywater
Natural abundance
Dosimeter
Empirical formula
Photoresistor
Technological applications of superconductivity
F region
Periodic table (large version)
SQUID
Thomas Johann Seebeck
Valence band
Structural biology
Globular protein
Stereochemistry
Lonsdaleite
Monosaccharide
Respirometer
Crystallographic defect
Unbinilium
Drop (liquid)
Chalcogen
Pentose
Ferric
Nonmetal
Threonine