# Co-NP

 related topics {math, number, function}

In computational complexity theory, co-NP is a complexity class. A problem ${\mathcal{X}}$ is a member of co-NP if and only if its complement $\overline{\mathcal{X}}$ is in the complexity class NP. In simple terms, co-NP is the class of problems for which efficiently verifiable proofs of no instances, sometimes called counterexamples, exist.

An example of an NP-complete problem is the subset sum problem: given a finite set of integers is there a non-empty subset which sums to zero? To give a proof of a "yes" instance, one must specify a non-empty subset which does sum to zero. The complementary problem is in co-NP and asks: "given a finite set of integers, does every non-empty subset have a nonzero sum?" To give a proof of a "no" instance one must specify a non-empty subset which does sum to zero, which is easily verified.

P, the class of polynomial time solvable problems, is a subset of both NP and co-NP. P is thought to be a strict subset in both cases (and demonstrably cannot be strict in one case but not the other). NP and co-NP are also thought to be unequal. If so, then no NP-complete problem can be in co-NP and no co-NP-complete problem can be in NP.

This can be shown as follows. Assume that there is an NP-complete problem that is in co-NP. Since all problems in NP can be reduced to this problem it follows that for all problems in NP we can construct a non-deterministic Turing machine that decides the complement of the problem in polynomial time, i.e., NP is a subset of co-NP. From this it follows that the set of complements of the problems in NP is a subset of the set of complements of the problems in co-NP, i.e., co-NP is a subset of NP. Since we already knew that NP is a subset of co-NP it follows that they are the same. The proof for the fact that no co-NP-complete problem can be in NP is symmetrical.

If a problem can be shown to be in both NP and co-NP, that is generally accepted as strong evidence that the problem is probably not NP-complete (since otherwise NP = co-NP).

An example of a problem which is known to be in NP and in co-NP is integer factorization: given positive integers m and n determine if m has a factor less than n and greater than one. Membership in NP is clear; if m does have such a factor then the factor itself is a certificate. Membership in co-NP is more subtle; one must list the prime factors of m and provide a primality certificate for each one.

Integer factorization is often confused with the closely related primality problem. Both primality testing and factorization have long been known to be NP and co-NP problems. The AKS primality test, published in 2002, proves that primality testing also lies in P, while factorization may or may not have a polynomial-time algorithm.[1]

### References

 related documents Sieve of Eratosthenes Endomorphism ring Equivalence class Center (group theory) Sedenion Disjoint sets Measurable function Context-sensitive language Galois group Markov process Church–Rosser theorem Co-NP-complete Euclidean distance Chart parser Lazy initialization Digital Signature Algorithm Power associativity Gabriel Lamé Leaf node JUnit Senary Recursive language Harmonic analysis Water, gas, and electricity Mary (programming language) Uniform Resource Locator Greibach normal form Probability axioms Doubling the cube Integer sequence