Colin Ward

related topics
{theory, work, human}
{government, party, election}
{war, force, army}
{law, state, case}
{city, large, area}
{group, member, jewish}
{build, building, house}
{land, century, early}
{work, book, publish}
{black, white, people}
{woman, child, man}
{company, market, business}
{system, computer, user}
{church, century, christian}
{area, community, home}
{village, small, smallsup}
{son, year, death}

Ward’s philosophy aimed at removing authoritarian forms of social organisation and replacing them with self-managed, non-hierarchical forms. This form of federalism was put forward in part by Kropotkin and Proudhon and is based upon the principle that, as Ward put it, ‘in small face-to-face groups, the bureaucratising and hierarchical tendencies inherent in organisations have least opportunity to develop’. He particularly admired the Swiss system of direct democracy and cantons whereby each canton is run by its members who have control on the laws placed upon them.

‘I believe that the social ideas of anarchism: autonomous groups, spontaneous order, workers’ control, the federative principle, add up to a coherent theory of social organisation which is a valid and realistic alternative to the authoritarian, hierarchical and institutional social philosophy which we see in application all around us. Man will be compelled, Kropotkin declared, ‘to find new forms of organisation for the social functions which the State fulfils through the bureaucracy’ and he insisted that ‘as long as this is not done nothing will be done. I think we have discovered what these new forms of organisation should be. We have now to make the opportunities for putting them into practice’.

Quotations

‘You may think in describing anarchism as a theory of organisation I am propounding a deliberate paradox: ‘anarchy’ you may consider to be, by definition, the opposite of organisation. In fact, however, ‘anarchy’ means the absence of government, the absence of authority. Can there be social organisation without authority, without government? The anarchists claim that there can be, and they also claim that it is desirable that there should be. They claim that, at the basis of our social problems is the principle of government. It is, after all, governments which prepare for war and wage war, even though you are obliged to fight in them and pay for them; the bombs you are worried about are not the bombs which cartoonists attribute to the anarchists, but the bombs which governments have perfected, at your expense. It is, after all, governments which make and enforce the laws which enable the 'haves' to retain control over social assets rather than share them with the 'have-nots'. It is, after all, the principle of authority which ensures that people will work for someone else for the greater part of their lives, not because they enjoy it or have any control over their work, but because they see it as their only means of livelihood.

‘I said that it is governments which make wars and prepare for wars, but obviously it is not governments alone - the power of a government, even the most absolute dictatorship, depends on the tacit assent of the governed. Why do people consent to be governed? It isn't only fear: what have millions of people to fear from a small group of politicians? It is because they subscribe to the same values as their governors. Rulers and ruled alike believe in the principle of authority, of hierarchy, of power. These are the characteristics of the political principle. The anarchists, who have always distinguished between the state and society, adhere to the social principle, which can be seen wherever men link themselves in an association based on a common need or a common interest. ‘The State’ said the German anarchist Gustav Landauer, ‘is not something which can be destroyed by a revolution, but is a condition, a certain relationship between human beings, a mode of human behaviour; we destroy it by contracting other relationships, by behaving differently.’

‘In my experience there are two kinds of Green people. There are philanthropists (lovers of humankind), who see the revolution in communications and the collapse of the city economy as the opportunity for the greening of the dense Victorian city. And there are the misanthropists (haters of humanity), who want to pull up the drawbridge to exclude those urban hordes from ‘rural’ England, which they quaintly equate with a ‘natural’ environment. They want to keep those beastly city-dwellers in the urban ghetto. The rich, of course, know the advantages of both environments and have a country seat and a pad in town.’

Bibliography

  • Autonomy, Solidarity, Possibility: The Colin Ward Reader (edited by Damian F. White and Chris Wilbert) (2011)
  • Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction (2004)
  • Cotters and Squatters: The Hidden History of Housing (2004)
  • Talking Anarchy (with David Goodway) (2003)
  • Sociable Cities: The Legacy of Ebenezer Howard (with Peter Hall) (1999)
  • Reflected in Water: a Crisis of Social Responsibility (1997)
  • Havens and Springboards: The Foyer Movement in Context (1997)
  • New Town, Home Town (1993)
  • Freedom to Go: After the Motor Age (1991)
  • Talking Houses: 10 Lectures (1990)
  • Undermining the Central Line (with Ruth Rendell) (1989)
  • Welcome, Thinner City: Urban Survival in the 1990s (1989)
  • The Allotment: Its Landscape and Culture (with David Crouch) (1988)
  • The Child in the Country (1988)
  • Chartres: the Making of a Miracle (1986)
  • Goodnight Campers! The History of the British Holiday Camp (with Dennis Hardy) (1986)
  • When We Build Again: Let's Have Housing that Works! (1985)
  • The Child In The City (1978)
  • Housing: An Anarchist Approach (1976)
  • British School Buildings: Designs and Appraisals 1964-74 (1976)
  • Tenants Take Over (1974)
  • Utopia (1974)
  • Vandalism (ed.) (1974)
  • Anarchy in Action (1973)
  • Streetwork: The Exploding School with journalist Anthony Fyson (1973)
  • Work (1972)

Full article ▸

related documents
The End of History and the Last Man
John Ralston Saul
Applied ethics
Social psychology
Action theory
Arnold J. Toynbee
Non sequitur (logic)
Incompatible-properties argument
Viruses of the Mind
Sanity
Self-evidence
Norm (sociology)
Will (philosophy)
Serendipity
Hans-Georg Gadamer
Robert Nozick
Reframing (NLP)
Deception
The Blind Watchmaker
James P. Hogan (writer)
Hierarchical organization
Daniel Dennett
Samuel P. Huntington
Evolutionary linguistics
Behavior
Antinomy
World Brain
Ethnocentrism
Social epistemology
Ludwig von Bertalanffy