Distributive justice

related topics
{law, state, case}
{theory, work, human}
{group, member, jewish}
{rate, high, increase}
{country, population, people}
{government, party, election}

Distributive justice concerns what some consider to be socially just with respect to the allocation of goods in a society. Thus, a community in which incidental inequalities in outcome do not arise would be considered a society guided by the principles of distributive justice[citation needed]. Allocation of goods takes into thought the total amount of goods to be handed out, the process on how they in the civilization are going to dispense, and the pattern of division[citation needed]. Civilizations have a narrow amount of resources and capital; the problem arises on how the goods should be divided[dubious ].

The common answer to this question is that every individual receives a fair share[neutrality is disputed]. Often contrasted with just process, which is concerned with just processes such as in the administration of law, distributive justice concentrates on just outcomes and consequences[original research?]. A prominent contemporary theorist of distributive justice is the philosopher John Rawls, although this subject matter has now received wide treatment across philosophy and the social sciences (see James Konow, 2003).

Contents

Distributive justice and wealth

Distributive justice considers the distribution of goods among members of society at a specific time, and on that basis, determines whether the state of affairs is subjectively acceptable[citation needed]. For example, someone who evaluates a situation by looking at the standard of living, absolute wealth, wealth disparity, or any other such utilitarian standard, is thinking in terms of distributive justice[original research?]. Distributive justice could be considered a means that addresses the burdens and benefits to some norm of equality to members[citation needed]. The definition of distributive justice has stayed constant, compared to other concepts in macro marketing and social economics[original research?].

Full article ▸

related documents
Industrial espionage
Special pleading
Oral law
Personal property
Corrections
Brocard (legal term)
Insanity
Animus nocendi
European Communities Act 1972 (UK)
Norris-La Guardia Act
Negligence per se
Communications Act of 1934
Security engineering
Nuremberg Code
Deed poll
Court of Chivalry
Fletcher v. Peck
Munn v. Illinois
Momus
Force Bill
Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
Exit procedure
Government Communications Headquarters
McCarran Internal Security Act
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
Waqf
Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Pentito
William Pierce, Jr.
Campaign for Homosexual Law Reform