A fractal landscape is a surface generated using a stochastic algorithm designed to produce fractal behaviour that mimics the appearance of natural terrain. In other words, the result of the procedure is not a deterministic fractal surface, but rather a random surface that exhibits fractal behaviour.^{[1]}
Many natural phenomena exhibit some form of statistical selfsimilarity that can be modeled by fractal surfaces.^{[2]} Moreover, variations in surface texture provide important visual cues to the orientation and slopes of surfaces, and the use of almost selfsimilar fractal patterns can help create natural looking visual effects.^{[3]} The modeling of the Earth's rough surfaces via fractional Brownian motion was first proposed by Benoît Mandelbrot.^{[4]}
Because the intended result of the process is to produce a landscape, rather than a mathematical function, processes are frequently applied to such landscapes that may affect the stationarity and even the overall fractal behavior of such a surface, in the interests of producing a more convincing landscape.
According to R. R. Shearer, the generation of natural looking surfaces and landscapes was a major turning port in art history, where the distinction between geometric, computer generated images and natural, man made art became blurred.^{[5]}
Contents
Behaviour of natural landscapes
Whether or not natural landscapes behave in a generally fractal matter has been the subject of some research. Technically speaking, any surface in threedimensional space has a topological dimension of 2, and therefore any fractal surface in threedimensional space has a Hausdorff dimension between 2 and 3.^{[6]} Real landscapes however, have varying behaviour at different scales. This means that an attempt to calculate the 'overall' fractal dimension of a real landscape can result in measures of negative fractal dimension, or of fractal dimension above 3. In particular, many studies of natural phenomena, even those commonly thought to exhibit fractal behaviour, do not in fact do so over more than a few orders of magnitude. For instance, Richardson's examination of the western coastline of Britain showed fractal behaviour of the coastline over only two orders of magnitude.^{[7]} In general, there is no reason to suppose that the geological processes that shape terrain on large scales (for example plate tectonics) exhibit the same mathematical behaviour as those that shape terrain on smaller scales (for instance soil creep).
Full article ▸
