Morris worm

related topics
{system, computer, user}
{law, state, case}
{specie, animal, plant}
{disease, patient, cell}
{work, book, publish}
{theory, work, human}
{rate, high, increase}
{black, white, people}
{war, force, army}
{math, number, function}
{food, make, wine}

The Morris worm or Internet worm of November 2, 1988 was one of the first computer worms distributed via the Internet. It is considered the first worm and was certainly the first to gain significant mainstream media attention. It also resulted in the first conviction in the US under the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.[1] It was written by a student at Cornell University, Robert Tappan Morris, and launched on November 2, 1988 from MIT.

Contents

Architecture of the worm

According to its creator, the Morris worm was not written to cause damage, but to gauge the size of the Internet. However, the worm was released from MIT to disguise the fact that the worm originally came from Cornell. (Incidentally, Morris is now a professor at MIT.) Additionally, the Morris worm worked by exploiting known vulnerabilities in Unix sendmail, Finger, and rsh/rexec, as well as weak passwords.

A supposedly unintended consequence of the code, however, caused it to be more damaging: a computer could be infected multiple times and each additional process would slow the machine down, eventually to the point of being unusable. The main body of the worm could only infect DEC VAX machines running 4BSD, and Sun-3 systems. A portable C "grappling hook" component of the worm was used to pull over the main body, and the grappling hook could run on other systems, loading them down and making them peripheral victims.

The mistake

The critical error that transformed the worm from a potentially harmless intellectual exercise into a virulent denial of service attack was in the spreading mechanism. The worm could have determined whether to invade a new computer by asking if there was already a copy running. But just doing this would have made it trivially easy to kill; everyone could just run a process that would answer "yes" when asked if there was already a copy, and the worm would stay away. The defense against this was inspired by Michael Rabin's mantra, "Randomization." To compensate for this possibility, Morris directed the worm to copy itself even if the response is "yes", 1 out of 7 times.[2] This level of replication proved excessive and the worm spread rapidly, infecting some computers multiple times. Morris remarked, when he heard of the mistake, that he "should have tried it on a simulator first."

Effects of the worm

It is usually reported that around 6,000 major UNIX machines were infected by the Morris worm. Paul Graham has claimed[3] that

Full article ▸

related documents
Local call
Gating
LAME
Moving Picture Experts Group
Programmed Data Processor
Ncurses
GÉANT
Steenbeck
Sega VR
Federal Information Processing Standard
IBrowse
TAT-8
Communications in Slovenia
Djbdns
Zlib
Digital Research
Gnuplot
Knowbot Information Service
Sophie Wilson
Communications in Mauritania
SimpleText
Hotline
Communications-electronics
Communications in Uzbekistan
SEX (computing)
Communications in Barbados
Communications in Nepal
XyWrite
TAT-6
Communications in Eritrea