Noosphere

related topics
{theory, work, human}
{math, energy, light}
{album, band, music}
{system, computer, user}
{church, century, christian}
{style, bgcolor, rowspan}
{group, member, jewish}

Noosphere (pronounced /ˈnoʊ.ɵsfɪər/; sometimes noösphere), according to the thought of Vladimir Vernadsky[1] and Teilhard de Chardin, denotes the "sphere of human thought"[2]. The word is derived from the Greek νοῦς (nous "mind") + σφαῖρα (sphaira "sphere"), in lexical analogy to "atmosphere" and "biosphere"[3]. Introduced by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin 1922 [4] in his Cosmogenesis"[5]. Another possibility is the first use of the term by Édouard Le Roy, who together with Chardin was listening to lectures of Vladimir Vernadsky at Sorbonne. 1936 Vernadsky accepted the idea of the Noosphere in a letter to Boris Leonidovich Lichkov (though, he states that the concept derives from Le Roy).

In the original theory of Vernadsky, the noosphere is the third in a succession of phases of development of the Earth, after the geosphere (inanimate matter) and the biosphere (biological life). Just as the emergence of life fundamentally transformed the geosphere, the emergence of human cognition fundamentally transforms the biosphere. In contrast to the conceptions of the Gaia theorists, or the promoters of cyberspace, Vernadsky's noosphere emerges at the point where humankind, through the mastery of nuclear processes, begins to create resources through the transmutation of elements. It is also currently being researched as part of the Princeton Global Consciousness Project.[6]

Contents

History of concept

For Teilhard, the noosphere emerges through and is constituted by the interaction of human minds. The noosphere has grown in step with the organization of the human mass in relation to itself as it populates the earth. As mankind organizes itself in more complex social networks, the higher the noosphere will grow in awareness. This concept is an extension of Teilhard's Law of Complexity/Consciousness, the law describing the nature of evolution in the universe. Teilhard argued the noosphere is growing towards an even greater integration and unification, culminating in the Omega Point, which he saw as the goal of history. The goal of history, then, is an apex of thought/consciousness.

Full article ▸

related documents
Counterfactual history
Charisma
Relativist fallacy
Cognition
Consilience
Julia Kristeva
Precognition
Universal (metaphysics)
Darwinism
Scottish Enlightenment
Tradition
Cogito ergo sum
Félix Guattari
Epimenides paradox
Hope
Alfred North Whitehead
Regional science
Revolution
Melvin Defleur
Ganzfeld experiment
Paradox
Wilhelm von Humboldt
William of Ockham
Thomas Szasz
Mohism
Unintended consequence
Defamiliarization
Gersonides
Cognitive bias
A Modest Proposal