Open Systems Interconnection

related topics
{system, computer, user}
{company, market, business}
{theory, work, human}
{government, party, election}
{work, book, publish}
{math, number, function}
{church, century, christian}
{disease, patient, cell}

Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) is an effort to standardize networking that was started in 1977[1] by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), along with the ITU-T.



Prior to OSI, networking was largely either government-sponsored (ARPANET, CYCLADES) or vendor-developed and proprietary, the latter effort consisting of protocol standards such as SNA, Appletalk, NetWare and DECnet. In the UK work on the Experimental Packet Switched system circa 1973, the need to define so called higher level protocols above the HDLC link level communications protocol and the content of an NCC (UK) publication 'Why Distributed Computing' resulting from considerable research into future configurations for computer systems resulted in the UK presenting the case for an International Standards Committee to cover this area at the ISO meeting in Sydney in March 1977. OSI was hence an industry effort, attempting to get industry participants to agree on common network standards to provide multi-vendor interoperability. It was common for large networks to support multiple network protocol suites, with many devices unable to interoperate with other devices because of a lack of common protocols. However, while OSI developed its networking standards, TCP/IP came into widespread use on multivendor networks for internetworking, while on the local network level both Ethernet and token ring gained prominence.

The OSI reference model was a major advance in the teaching of network concepts. It promoted the idea of a consistent model of protocol layers, defining interoperability between network devices and software. The OSI model was defined in raw form in Washington DC in February 1978 by Hubert Zimmerman of France and the refined standard was published by the ISO in 1984.


The OSI protocol suite that was specified as part of the project was considered by many to be too complicated and inefficient, and to a large extent unimplementable.[2] Taking the "forklift upgrade" approach to networking, it specified eliminating all existing protocols and replacing them with new ones at all layers of the stack.[citation needed] This made implementation difficult, and was resisted by many vendors and users with significant investments in other network technologies.[2] In addition, the OSI protocols were specified by committees filled with differing and sometimes conflicting feature requests, leading to numerous optional features; because so much was optional, many vendors' implementations simply could not interoperate, negating the whole effort.[citation needed] Even demands by the USA for OSI support on all government purchased hardware did not save the effort.[citation needed]

Full article ▸

related documents
Real-time operating system
Composite video
Apple IIe Card
Capacitive coupling
Very-large-scale integration
Motorola 68020
Picture archiving and communication system
Power Macintosh
RAM disk
S-100 bus
Digital image processing
Chaffing and winnowing
Break key
Frequency-shift keying
Audio signal processing
Cambridge Z88
Direct-sequence spread spectrum
Channel access method
Intel 80286
Telephony Application Programming Interface
Control engineering
Tagged Image File Format