related topics
{theory, work, human}
{specie, animal, plant}
{woman, child, man}
{car, race, vehicle}
{work, book, publish}
{company, market, business}

In philosophy, particulars are concrete entities existing in space and time as opposed to abstractions. There are, however, theories of abstract particulars or tropes. For example, Socrates is a particular (there's only one Socrates-the-teacher-of-Plato and one cannot make copies of him, e.g., by cloning him, without introducing new, distinct particulars). Redness, by contrast, is not a particular, because it is abstract and multiply-instantiated (my bicycle, this apple, and that woman's hair are all red).

Sybil Wolfram[1] writes

Particulars include only individuals of a certain kind: as a first approximation individuals with a definite place in space and time, such as persons and material objects or events, or which must be identified through such individuals, like smiles or thoughts.

Some terms are used by philosophers with a rough-and-ready idea of their meaning. This can occur if there is lack of agreement about the best definition of the term. In formulating a solution to the problem of universals, the term 'particular' can be used to describe the particular instance of redness of a certain apple as opposed to the 'universal' 'redness' (being abstract). See also type-token distinction


Related articles

Full article ▸

related documents
Neutral monism
Emic and etic
Damned knowledge
Affirming the consequent
Harold Lasswell
Theoretical ecology
Marxist literary criticism
Pre-Socratic philosophy
David Gauthier
Educational essentialism
Moral universalism
Shoma Morita
Ordinary language
World History
Francisco Varela
William Paley
Inverse gambler's fallacy
Technology assessment
History of science and technology
Instructional theory
Conceptual schema
Erhard Seminars Training