Political compass

related topics
{theory, work, human}
{government, party, election}
{math, energy, light}
{rate, high, increase}
{work, book, publish}
{group, member, jewish}
{@card@, make, design}

The underlying theory of the Political Compass is that political views may be better measured along two separate and independent axes.[2] The Economic (Left-Right) axis measures one's opinion of how the economy should be run: "left" is defined as the view that the economy should be run by a cooperative collective agency (which can mean the state, but can also mean a network of communes), while "right" is defined as the view that the economy should be left to the devices of competing individuals and organisations. The other axis (Authoritarian-Libertarian) measures one's political opinions in a social sense, regarding a view of the appropriate amount of personal freedom: "libertarianism" is defined as the belief that personal freedom should be maximised, while "authoritarianism" is defined as the belief that authority and tradition should be obeyed.

The labels given to the different fields and axes on the compass are based on long-standing European and Commonwealth terminology, which can be different to those used in the politics of the United States[citation needed].

A number of other multi-axis models of political thought exist. Some are based on similar axes to the Political Spectrum. A similar chart appeared in Floodgates of Anarchy by Albert Meltzer.[3]


The Politicalcompass.org website does not reveal the people behind it, beyond the fact that it seems to be based in the UK.[4][5] According to the New York Times, the site is the work of Wayne Brittenden, a political journalist.[1] According to Tom Utley, writing in the Daily Telegraph, the site is connected to One World Action, a charity founded by Glenys Kinnock, and to Kinnock herself.[6] An early version of the site was published on One World Action's web server.[7]

The website does not explain its scoring system in detail and some writers have criticised its validity while others have treated it more as a form of entertainment than a rigorous analysis.[8][6][9][4]

See also

Full article ▸

related documents
Semantic dispute
William H. Riker
Gerald Schroeder
Anaximenes of Miletus
Linus's Law
Biosecurity protocol
Homesteading the Noosphere
Political economy
Georg Henrik von Wright
Argumentum ad baculum
Ken MacLeod
Ewald Hering
William Alston
John Balguy
ELIZA effect
Safe, sane and consensual
Enchiridion of Epictetus
Boole's syllogistic
John F. Sowa
Tertium comparationis
Physical science
Emergent organisation
The Memory of Whiteness
Nicholas Barbon
Retreat (spiritual)