Precautionary principle

related topics
{law, state, case}
{theory, work, human}
{rate, high, increase}
{disease, patient, cell}
{specie, animal, plant}
{company, market, business}
{acid, form, water}
{woman, child, man}
{water, park, boat}
{ship, engine, design}

The precautionary principle states that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking the action.

This principle allows policy makers to make discretionary decisions in situations where there is the possibility of harm from taking a particular course or making a certain decision when extensive scientific knowledge on the matter is lacking. The principle implies that there is a social responsibility to protect the public from exposure to harm, when scientific investigation has found a plausible risk. These protections can be relaxed only if further scientific findings emerge that provide sound evidence that no harm will result.

In some legal systems, as in the law of the European Union, the application of the precautionary principle has been made a statutory requirement.[1]

Contents

Full article ▸

related documents
Deprogramming
Property law
Tom Denning, Baron Denning
Right of self-defense
Mens rea
Freedom of the press
Romer v. Evans
Deposition (law)
Rule of law
Will (law)
James Randi Educational Foundation
Victimless crime
Mutiny
European Court of Justice
Advocate
Statute of limitations
Satanic ritual abuse
Citation signal
Civil procedure
Government of California
Defense of Marriage Act
United States Marshals Service
Kenneth Starr
Australian Secret Intelligence Service
Personal jurisdiction (United States)
Taft–Hartley Act
Volkert van der Graaf
Bhopal disaster
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Precedent