Range voting

related topics
{government, party, election}
{rate, high, increase}
{game, team, player}
{car, race, vehicle}
{math, number, function}
{city, population, household}
{area, community, home}

Range voting (also called ratings summation, average voting, cardinal ratings, score voting, 0–99 voting, the score system, or the point system) is a voting system for one-seat elections under which voters score each candidate, the scores are added up, and the candidate with the highest score wins. A form of range voting[1][2] was apparently used in some elections in Ancient Sparta by measuring how loudly the crowd shouted for different candidates;[3] rough modern-day equivalents include the use of clapometers in some television shows and the judging processes of some athletic competitions. Approval voting can be considered to be range voting with only two levels: approved (1) and disapproved (0). A Quaker poll is a variation with three levels: approved (1), neutral (0), and disapproved (-1).

Contents

Voting system

Range voting uses a ratings ballot; that is, each voter rates each candidate with a number within a specified range, such as 0 to 99 or 1 to 5. Although in cumulative voting voters are not permitted to provide scores for more than some number of candidates, in range voting all candidates can be and should be rated. The scores for each candidate are summed, and the candidate with the highest sum is the winner. If voters are explicitly allowed to abstain from rating certain candidates, as opposed to implicitly giving the lowest number of points to unrated candidates, then a candidate's score would be the average rating from voters who did rate this candidate.

In some competitions subject to judges' scores, a truncated mean is used to remove extreme scores. For example, range voting with truncated means is used in figure skating competitions to avoid the results of the third skater affecting the relative positions of two skaters who have already finished their performances (the independence of irrelevant alternatives), using truncation to mitigate biases of some judges who have ulterior motives to score some competitors too high or low.

Another method of counting ratings ballots is to find the median score of each candidate, and elect the candidate with the highest median score. This method is also referred to as Majority Judgement.[4][5] It could have the effect of reducing the incentive to exaggerate. A potential disadvantage is that multiway exact ties for winner may become common, although a method exists in Majority Judgement to break such ties.[4] In conventional range voting, these ties would be extremely rare. Another consequence of using medians is that adding an "all-zero ballot" can alter the election winner, which is arguably a disadvantage.

Full article ▸

related documents
Vice president
United States presidential election, 1892
United Kingdom general elections
United States presidential election, 1792
People First Party (Republic of China)
Representative democracy
Natural Law Party (United States)
Foreign relations of Ukraine
Politics of Uruguay
Foreign relations of Venezuela
United States presidential election, 1812
Electoral reform
Daniel D. Tompkins
Foreign relations of Uzbekistan
List of Governors of Florida
Spoils system
United States presidential election, 1908
History of the United States National Security Council 1969–1974
Althing
Head of government
Víctor Raúl Haya de la Torre
Senate
Jane Byrne
Knesset
James Weaver
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
Foreign relations of Zimbabwe
United States presidential election, 1828
William R. King
United States presidential election, 1868