Standardized testing and public policy

related topics
{school, student, university}
{rate, high, increase}
{theory, work, human}
{law, state, case}
{government, party, election}

Standardized testing is used as a public policy strategy to establish stronger accountability measures for public education. While the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) has served as an educational barometer for some thirty years by administering standardized tests on a regular basis to random schools throughout the United States, efforts over the last decade at the state and federal levels have mandated annual standardized test administration for all public schools across the country.

The idea behind the standardized testing policy movement is that testing is the first step to improving schools, teaching practice, and educational methods through data collection. Proponents argue that the data generated by the standardized tests act like a 'report card' for the community, demonstrating how well local schools are performing. Critics of the movement, however, point to various discrepancies that result from current state standardized testing practices, including problems with test validity and reliability and false correlations (see Simpson's paradox).

Critics charge that standardized tests became a mandatory curriculum placed into schools without public debate and without any accountability measures of its own. Many feel this ignores basic democratic principles in that control of schools' curricula is removed from local school boards, which are the nominal curricular authority in the U.S. While some maintain that it would be preferable to simply introduce mandatory national curricula, others feel that state mandated standardized testing should stop altogether in order that schools can focus their efforts on instructing their students as they see fit.

Critics also charge that standardized tests encourage "teaching to the test" at the expense of creativity and in-depth coverage of subjects not on the test. Multiple choice tests are criticized for failing to assess skills such as writing. Furthermore, student's success is being tracked to a teacher's relative performance, making teacher advancement contingent upon a teacher's success with a student's academic performance. Ethical and economical questions arise for teachers when faced with clearly underperforming or underskilled students and a standardized test.

See also

External links

Full article ▸

related documents
University of Lausanne
Stand and Deliver
St Cross College, Oxford
Finishing school
Northwestern College (Iowa)
St Hilda's College, Oxford
Old boy network
Garwood, New Jersey
Balliol College, Oxford
Fanwood, New Jersey
West Long Branch, New Jersey
Fort Lewis College
East Rockaway, New York
Point Pleasant, New Jersey
Laurel Springs, New Jersey
Montana State University - Northern
University of Puerto Rico
Holmdel Township, New Jersey
Hillsdale, New Jersey
Ship Bottom, New Jersey
Gibbsboro, New Jersey
Whitman, Massachusetts
Hazard
Hackettstown, New Jersey
Robert Lucas, Jr.
Westwood, Massachusetts
All Souls College, Oxford
University of Dublin
Scouting in South Dakota
Corpus Christi College, Oxford