The Prince

related topics
{war, force, army}
{theory, work, human}
{son, year, death}
{law, state, case}
{island, water, area}
{rate, high, increase}
{game, team, player}
{work, book, publish}

The Prince (Italian: Il Principe) is a political treatise by the Italian diplomat, historian and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli. From correspondence a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (About Principalities). But the printed version was not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death. This was done with the permission of the Medici pope Clement VII, but "long before then, in fact since the first appearance of the Prince in manuscript, controversy had swirled about his writings".[1]

Although it was written as if it were a traditional work in the Mirror of Princes style, it is generally agreed that it was especially innovative, and not only because it was written in Italian rather than Latin.[2] The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, in which the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It was also in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time concerning how to consider politics and ethics.[3][4]

Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most remembered of his works and the one most responsible for bringing "Machiavellian" into wide usage as a pejorative term. It also helped make "Old Nick" an English term for the devil, and even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words "politics" and "politician" in western countries.[5] In terms of subject matter it overlaps with the much longer Discourses on Livy, which was written a few years later. In its use of examples who were politically active Italians who perpetrated criminal deeds for politics, another lesser-known work by Machiavelli which The Prince has been compared to is the Life of Castruccio Castracani.

The descriptions within The Prince have the general theme of accepting that ends of princes, such as glory, and indeed survival, can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.[6]

He who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin than his preservation.

Machiavelli, "Chapter 15", The Prince, Constitution.org, http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/m/machiavelli/niccolo/m149p/chapter15.html/, retrieved 2010 

Full article ▸

related documents
Lebensraum
New Historians
Moral equivalence
Conventional warfare
Trofim Lysenko
Frantz Fanon
Peroz I
Carausius
Tostig Godwinson
Cajemé
Alexander Ball
Pax Americana
Christian III of Denmark
Bergen-Belsen concentration camp
Túpac Amaru
Alexander Nevsky
Gaius Suetonius Paulinus
Justinian II
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri
David Farragut
Wikipedia:Wikiproject Military history/Battles sandbox
Battle of Nördlingen (1634)
Fourth Anglo-Dutch War
Gaius Cassius Longinus
Khan Yunis
Grand Illusion (film)
Rebel Alliance
Air Raid Precautions
Charles the Bold
Lal Bahadur Shastri