Three Mile Island accident

related topics
{acid, form, water}
{ship, engine, design}
{law, state, case}
{build, building, house}
{film, series, show}
{service, military, aircraft}
{album, band, music}
{disease, patient, cell}
{work, book, publish}
{day, year, event}
{island, water, area}
{rate, high, increase}
{food, make, wine}
{line, north, south}
{government, party, election}
{game, team, player}
{math, energy, light}
{church, century, christian}
{company, market, business}

The Three Mile Island accident was a partial core meltdown in Unit 2 (a pressurized water reactor manufactured by Babcock & Wilcox) of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania near Harrisburg in 1979. The plant was owned and operated by General Public Utilities and the Metropolitan Edison Co. It was the most significant accident in the history of the American commercial nuclear power generating industry, resulting in the release of up to 481 PBq (13 million curies) of radioactive gases, but less than 740 GBq (20 curies) of the particularly dangerous iodine-131.[1]

The accident began at 4 a.m. on Wednesday, March 25, 1979, with failures in the non-nuclear secondary system, followed by a stuck-open pilot-operated relief valve (PORV) in the primary system, which allowed large amounts of nuclear reactor coolant to escape. The mechanical failures were compounded by the initial failure of plant operators to recognize the situation as a loss of coolant accident due to inadequate training and human factors, such as industrial design errors relating to ambiguous control room indicators in the power plant's user interface. The scope and complexity of the accident became clear over the course of five days, as employees of Metropolitan Edison (Met Ed, the utility operating the plant), Pennsylvania state officials, and members of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) tried to understand the problem, communicate the situation to the press and local community, decide whether the accident required an emergency evacuation, and ultimately end the crisis.

In the end, the reactor was brought under control, although full details of the accident were not discovered until much later, following extensive investigations by both a presidential commission and the NRC. The Kemeny Commission Report concluded that "there will either be no case of cancer or the number of cases will be so small that it will never be possible to detect them. The same conclusion applies to the other possible health effects."[2] Several epidemiological studies in the years since the accident have supported the conclusion that radiation releases from the accident had no perceptible effect on cancer incidence in residents near the plant, though these findings have been contested by one team of researchers.[3]

Public reaction to the event was probably influenced by the release of the movie The China Syndrome 12 days before the accident, depicting an accident at a nuclear reactor.[4] Communications from officials during the initial phases of the accident were felt to be confusing.[5] The accident crystallized anti-nuclear safety concerns among activists and the general public, resulted in new regulations for the nuclear industry, and has been cited as a contributor to the decline of new reactor construction that was already underway in the 1970s.

Full article ▸

related documents
Advanced gas-cooled reactor
Gas chamber
Air conditioner
Allosteric regulation
Chemical compound
Green Goddess
Active transport
Soviet submarine K-278 Komsomolets
Vandenberg Air Force Base
Spray drying
Torpedo bomber
Tactical High Energy Laser
Anaerobic organism
Focke-Wulf Fw 200
Vacuum flask
Bituminous coal
Kaprun disaster
Ko-hyoteki class submarine
Gallium(III) arsenide
Essential amino acid
Type 23 frigate
Calcium oxide