Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act

related topics
{government, party, election}
{rate, high, increase}
{law, state, case}
{company, market, business}
{land, century, early}
{household, population, female}
{build, building, house}
{god, call, give}

The Revenue Act or Wilson-Gorman Tariff of 1894 (ch. 349, ยง73, 28 Stat. 570, August 27, 1894) slightly reduced the United States tariff rates from the numbers set in the 1890 McKinley tariff and imposed a 2% income tax. It is named for William L. Wilson, Representative from West Virginia, chair of the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee, and Senator Arthur P. Gorman of Maryland, both Democrats.

Supported by the Democrats, this attempt at tariff reform was important because it imposed the first peacetime income tax (2% on income over $4,000 or $88,100 in 2010 dollars, which meant fewer than 10% of households would pay any). The purpose of the income tax was to make up for revenue that would be lost by tariff reductions. By coincidence, $4,000 ($88,100 in 2010 dollars) would be the exemption for married couples when the Revenue Act of (October) 1913 was signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson, as a result of the ratification of the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in February 1913.

The bill introduced by Wilson and passed by the House significantly lowered tariff rates, in accord with Democratic platform promises, and dropped the tariff to zero on iron ore, coal, lumber and wool, which angered American producers. With Senator Gorman operating behind the scenes, protectionists in the Senate added more than 600 amendments that nullified most of the reforms and raised rates again. The "Sugar Trust" in particular made changes that favored itself at the expense of the consumer.

President Grover Cleveland, who had campaigned on lowering the tariff and supported Wilson's version of the bill, was devastated that his program had been ruined. He denounced the revised measure as a disgraceful product of "party perfidy and party dishonor," but still allowed it to become law without his signature, believing that it was better than nothing and was at the least an improvement over the McKinley tariff.


Income Tax Amendment

The New York Times reported that many Democrats in the East, "prefer to take the income tax, odious as it is, and unpopular as it is bound to be with their constituents," than to defeat the Wilson tariff bill.[1] Democratic Representative Johnson of Ohio supported the income tax as the lesser of two evils: "he was for an income tax as against a tariff tax; but he believed, that it was un-Democratic, inquisitorial, and wrong in principle."[2]


The income tax provision was struck down in 1895 by the U.S. Supreme Court case Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 428 (1895). In 1913, the 16th Amendment permitted a federal income tax.

Full article ▸

related documents
Party-list proportional representation
Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act
Foreign relations of Dominica
Latvian National Independence Movement
Politics of Morocco
Wim Kok
General election
National Assembly
Bonus Bill
Wolfgang Ischinger
Christian Social Union of Bavaria
Wendell Anderson
Foreign relations of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Edwin Scrymgeour
History of the Gambia
Charlotte Atkins
Federal republic
Politics of Martinique
Servilius Rullus
Nick Raynsford
Foreign relations of Jamaica
Lists of office-holders
Dan Coats
Alva Myrdal
Balfour Declaration of 1926
List of U.S. states by population
Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party
Premier of the People's Republic of China
Consociational state