LIT 132: Comparative American Literatures
Summer 2001

Grading guidelines


A -- Excellent
Work that uses the assignment as an occasion for a piece of writing compelling enough to engage readers on its own terms.  An A paper presents an individual insight or viewpoint with enough fullness and cogency to command readers' respect, if not their assent.  It complements its fresh thought by creating a distinctive voice through aptly chosen words and through sentences both grammatically accurate and rhetorically sophisticated.

In short, an A paper:
    --develops complicated ideas flexibly and fluently, yet with control and purpose
    --is concerned with subtleties of expression as well as with precise communication
    --shows desire and willingness to be inventive with structure and phrasing
 

B -- Very Good
Work that meets all an assignment's expectations with clear competence.  Usually lacking A work's compelling approach or development, B work nevertheless demonstrates its author's ability to respond intelligently to an assignment's demands, to structure and focus writing clearly, to select significant details and examples and to organize them effectively, to choose words accurately, and to revise sentences for conciseness and emphasis.

In short, a B paper:
    --includes clear thesis, organization, and continuity
    --gives evidence of independent thought; offers an illuminating insight
    --shows mature use of writing strategies to create concise, clear, and varied prose
 

C -- Satisfactory
Work that is adequate but not more.  C work usually meets most of the assignment's specifications, has a serviceable structure, and provides enough elaboration to make its intent understandable.  Nevertheless, a C paper typically lacks the sharp focus, the full and purposeful development, or the stylistic awareness necessary for a higher grade.  C work also often has repeated and distracting errors in grammar, mechanics, or idiom.

In short, a C paper:
    --may have a weak or fuzzy thesis, with illogical or unclear arguments to support it
    --may remain very general, relying more on summary or repetition than analysis
    --may depend on clichés or colloquialisms, or have a limited stylistic range
 
 

return to LIT 132 assignments page