Environmental Impact
Environmental impact is one of the chief factors determining
the fate of ocean sequestration. Concern over the change in pH
change and carbonate-ion concentration may or may not be legitimate.
It is predicated that adding 200 years worth of carbon dioxide
emissions, approximately1300 GtC at the current rate, would decrease
the average pH of the ocean by 0.3 units. To put that in perspective,
the pH of the ocean has decreased by 0.1 units since pre-industrial
times [1] .
The effects of a change in pH on deep-sea animals are not known.
However, it is probable that whatever the change, in the long
run it will be the same whether the carbon dioxide is released
into the atmosphere or sequestered in the ocean because so much
of the CO2 in the atmosphere ends up in the ocean eventually.
The pH change as a result of immediate sequestration may even
be preferable to the natural change because with sequestration,
the pH will change in the deep ocean, while the natural change
will occur closer to the surface, where there are more marine
biota [2] .
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) is currently
conducting experiments to test the effects of ocean disposal of
CO2 on deep-sea animals. A 2000 study produced the
surprising results that deep-sea creatures seemed to be attracted
rather than repulsed to a solution with a high concentration of
CO2 that was injected into the ocean. The scientists
have no reached a conclusion as to the reason for this, and further
tests will be preformed [3] . However,
it is speculated that increased acidity of the ocean will have
a negative effect on deep-sea creatures. Deep-sea fish and invertebrates
have naturally low metabolic rates, about one-thousandth the rate
of surface dwelling creatures [4] , and lowering rate
pH of their environs will further inhibit metabolic growth and
reproduction [5] .
Several studies have also confirmed that a change in pH will
have an effect on the surrounding ecosystem. The extent of the
damage done to marine organisms depends on the level of the pH
change and length of time the organism was exposed to the change.
For example, after ten hours of exposure to a pH of 5, fish larvae
will have a mortality rate of 5, while ten hours of exposure to
a pH of 4.5 results in a mortality rate of 9.5. For small clams,
five hundred hours of exposure can either result in a mortality
rate of 5 at pH 7 or a mortality rate of 80 at pH 6. The current
sequestering methods, however, are designed to result in a decrease
in pH from 8 to at most 7 at the point of injection. If the injection
method is designed so that the CO2 disperses properly,
there should be no pH change at all [6] .
Many environmentalists are not pleased with the prospect of ocean
sequestration. A scheduled field test by the Pacific International
Center for High Technology Research (PICHTR) and sponsored by
the U.S. Department of Energy planning sequester 20 tons of CO2
4.5 nautical miles off the coast of Nawiliwili, Kauai was cancelled due to large protests by groups
such as the Pacific Whale Foundation. The group cited such concerns
as, "If massive amounts of carbon are dumped into the
ocean, how can we be assured that it won't someday rise to the
surface and be released into the atmosphere?" and "high CO2
concentrations are also toxic to marine life."
[7] PICHTR responded that 20 tons of CO2 is a very
small amount, and the pH of the surrounding water would be minimally
affected and return to its natural pH within days. No damage
was expected to be done to swimming organisms or the coral reef [8] .
There is
obviously no general consensus regarding the environmental impact
of carbon dioxide sequestration in the deep ocean. If the pH
is expected to change, but by how much and what the impact will
be is still inconclusive.