|
Political Issues
|
|||
Quick ReferenceFusion Home
|
SAFETY
While these concerns may have some basis (Chernobyl for example) they are mostly to do with fission, rather than fusion, and even then are often unfounded. With fusion, some of these problems do arise, while others do not. MeltdownsThe issue of plant meltdowns or explosions is non-existent. The reactions are restricted by the amount of fuel being fed into the reactor (which is continuous, and used up almost instantaneously). If fuel is no longer added, the reaction stops, so there is no way for the reaction to get out of control. RadioactivityWhen it comes to radioactive wastes, fusion is not quite as bad when
compared to fission. Some wastes will inevitably be produced from renegade
high-energy neutrons from the reaction, which can fly out and contaminate
the reactor walls. The plus side is that the fusion wastes have a much
shorter radioactive lifetime than their fission counterparts, so temporary
storage of the wastes is possible; they can be stored until they lose
their radioactivity and be cleared from regulatory control or recycled
after 50 - 100 years. Weapons proliferationWith fission, highly enriched Plutonium can be used as weapons grade fuel, there is the fear of weapons proliferation. However, the fuel for fusion is readily available today (D in the oceans) so that if anyone were to want to try and construct another H-bomb or the like, they would not have to go through the trouble of stealing fuel from the fusion sites. |
||