Web Release Date: September 13,
Energy Landscape and Isotropic Tensile Strength of n-Alkane Glasses

Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Received: May 21, 2002
In Final Form: August 5, 2002
Abstract:
We report results from a systematic simulational study of the ultimate mechanical strength of n-alkane glasses for carbon numbers n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 16, 24, and 48. The ultimate isotropic tensile strength was determined by constructing the equation of state of energy landscape for this homologous series. The tensile strength depends nonmonotonically on carbon number, exhibiting a maximum at n = 3. The mass density at which fracture occurs initially increases with chain length and then reaches a plateau value for n > 8. The predictions of the landscape equation of state are entirely consistent with results generated by a direct inherent structure deformation procedure. Although the ultimate isotropic tensile strength maximum at n = 3 would seem to contradict physical intuition regarding chain entanglement, we present a simple mean-field theory that reveals the underlying physics responsible for the tensile strength maximum, namely the simple competition between intermolecular interactions and intramolecular packing effects.
The vitreous state of matter is ubiquitous in modern technology. For example,
waveguides composed of pure, glassy silica provide the infrastructure for
high-speed fiber optic networks.1
In the pharmaceutical industry, glassy matrices composed of sugar and water are
used to store and preserve labile proteins.2
Most polymeric engineering plastics are amorphous solids, and their manufacture
serves as a major driving force in the chemical industry. Bulk metallic glasses
have been shown to exhibit levels of mechanical strength substantially higher
than even the most carefully processed conventional metals and ceramics.3,4
Although much theoretical work remains to be done to explain the microscopic
mechanisms underlying the extraordinary viscosity slow-down that is the hallmark
of the glass transition, a number of practical routes to the glassy state are
known, ranging from vapor deposition to ion implantation and cold compression of
crystals.5-7
Ultimate mechanical strength is an important material property to consider in
any engineering application. Experimental determination of a material's ultimate
strength is commonly done dynamically, by deforming a specimen at a fixed rate
of strain until mechanical failure occurs.8,9
In this spirit, there has been considerable effort devoted toward predicting
the ultimate tensile strength of engineering materials. Because their atomic
positions can be determined experimentally, crystalline solids have historically
been the focus of such studies. Traditionally, the study of material strength in
a lattice has been formulated as a stability problem.11
More recently, at the microscopic-length scale, significant effort has been
devoted toward predicting the tensile and shear strength of crystalline solids
using sophisticated ab initio and quantum mechanical simulations.12-17
Because glasses possess history-dependent structure and are hence not in
equilibrium, they pose difficulties for theoretical and computational modeling
not encountered with crystals. Polymeric systems have received special attention
due to their industrial prominence.27-29
Since its introduction, the energy landscape formalism39,40
In this paper, we present results from a systematic study of the ultimate isotropic tensile strength of the n-alkane glasses using the energy landscape formalism. The most striking result of this work is that the strength within this family of glasses is maximized at n = 3. The outline of this paper is as follows. Section II reviews the landscape formalism and its relation to the mechanical strength of glasses. Section III describes the simulation model for the n-alkanes and methods used in this study. Results and discussion are presented in Section IV. Finally, Section V contains the main conclusions and lists the open questions suggested by this work.
The potential energy hypersurface or energy landscape,
(rN), is simply
the relationship between a system's total potential energy and its degrees of
freedom, and it naturally contains all the physics that govern its dynamics and
thermodynamics. Although the complexity of this surface precludes its detailed
description in all but the simplest systems, significant simplification can be
achieved by configurational mapping to topologically important features in the
landscape, namely potential energy minima. By definition, these minima are
mechanically stable, and provided that every point in configuration space (with
the possible exception of a zero-measure subset) can be mapped uniquely to a
minimum, they represent the mechanically stable atomic packings that a system
inherently samples as it explores configuration space. Accordingly, these local
potential energy minima are called inherent structures, and configurations that
map to the same minimum are collectively referred to as a basin of attraction.
Given a unique configurational mapping process, it can be rigorously shown that
the thermodynamics of glasses and supercooled liquids can be described in terms
of the distribution of inherent structure energies;39 at the same
time, dynamics are related to transitions between basins.59
Within the energetic hierarchy of this formalism, it naturally follows that
crystalline solids are systems occupying the lowest-lying energy basins; glasses
are systems trapped within amorphous inherent structures whose energies are
higher than that of the crystal; and deeply supercooled liquids are systems that
move infrequently between amorphous basins.
Mathematically, for a system of N atoms in the canonical ensemble, the
simplest configurational mapping takes each atom i along a steepest
descent path39,40

is the total potential energy of the
system, and s is a generic progress variable. As s
, solutions
to these equations satisfy mechanical equilibrium
The connection between the landscape and macroscopic properties of a glass is
provided by the equation of state of the energy landscape, that is to say
average inherent-structure pressure PIS as a function of bulk
density.44 It is precisely this thermodynamic construction that is
exploited here as a method to determine the ultimate isotropic tensile strength
of a glass. Because a glass is a liquid trapped within a potential energy
minimum or inherent structure, the equation of state of the energy landscape
physically corresponds to the equation of state of a liquid in the T = 0
limit. In the canonical ensemble, construction of the landscape equation of
state involves taking configurations from a thermally equilibrated simulation at
some temperature and density, minimizing their potential energies by eq 1, and
then calculating the average inherent-structure pressure. This procedure is
repeated at other densities, while maintaining the same equilibration
temperature. Although the equilibration temperature affects the average
inherent-structure energy, that is the average basin depth the system samples,
the equation of state of the landscape (pressure vs density) is largely
insensitive to it as long as the equilibration temperature is sufficiently high
(i.e., greater than the critical temperature). A notable exception is water
whose energy landscape is usually studied under conditions where the liquid is
supercooled and therefore exhibits slow inter-basin dynamics.47,61,62
For systems studied to date,43,46-48 the equation of state of the
landscape can generally be subdivided into three density regions, as shown in
Figure 1. The high-density region A is characterized by compressed
inherent structures. At intermediate densities, region B, inherent
structures are under isotropic tension. The pressure here decreases with
decreasing density until a minimum in pressure is reached. As in region
B, inherent structures in region C are also under tension, but the
pressure here increases with decreasing density and eventually vanishes as
density approaches zero. The density at which the minimum pressure,
S, is attained is called the
Sastry density,
S, and
separates region B from C.
Both PS and
S are characteristic material properties and have special
physical significance. Statistical geometric analyses of inherent structures in
atomic and simple molecular fluids have shown that they are spatially
heterogeneous below
S,
that is to say inherent structures below this limiting density consist of
densely packed regions of molecules coexisting with voids or
cracks.43,48 Thus, the Sastry density represents the lowest density
at which a homogeneous glass can exist and hence corresponds to the maximally
stretched glass. Therefore, the isotropic tension at this density,
-PS, is the maximum tension that a homogeneous glass
can sustain prior to fracture, otherwise known as its ultimate isotropic tensile
strength. These arguments strongly suggest that the Sastry point is the T
= 0 limit of the superheated liquid spinodal,43,44 and represents a
fundamental limit to homogeneous glass formation. For monatomic fluids
equilibrated above their critical temperature, the Sastry point bears a simple
yet intriguing relationship to the critical point. The ratio of the Sastry
density to critical density is roughly 3, whereas the ratio of the ultimate
isotropic tensile strength to critical pressure is approximately
-27.42 An important aspect of this work is to investigate whether
such simple relationships hold for molecular fluids.
The equation of state of the energy landscape is not only the means by which
to study the mechanical properties of glasses within the landscape formalism.
Alternatively, one can probe their mechanical behavior by directly deforming the
inherent structures themselves.27-29,63
By using a series of steps consisting of incremental deformations and subsequent
energy minimizations under constant strain, the mechanical response of glasses
under various loading conditions can be investigated in the low-temperature
limit. Although the majority of these studies have focused on how the underlying
landscape changes as a result of structural rearrangements that accompany
macroscopic strain, in particular, the relationship between mechanical yielding
and the disappearance of energy minima,60,64,65
We have studied the ultimate isotropic strength of the n-alkane glasses using two methods. In the first, the ultimate isotropic strength is determined by constructing the equation of state of the energy landscape and locating the Sastry point. In the second method, high-density inherent structures are processed by a sequence of incremental isotropic expansions and energy minimization steps. This series of steps is repeated until the system fractures, that is to say a minimum in pressure as a function of density is reached. A priori, it is unclear how the fracture properties determined by the two processes relate to each other, and hence an important part of this investigation is to clarify this relationship.
In this work, the n-alkanes are modeled as fully flexible chains of
united atoms with each interaction site corresponding to a CH4
molecule or either a -CH3 or -CH2- group. For a linear
chain of united atoms of length n, its conformation is completely
specified by the set of n-1 bond lengths d, n-2 bond angles
, n-3 dihedral angles
, and three Euler angles (
,
, and
) describing the relative orientation
of the first two bonds in the chain. This set constitutes the chain's
generalized coordinates. In conjunction with the position of the first united
atom within the chain, the spatial coordinates of each interaction site can be
specified completely by 3n degrees of freedom.
Bond stretching and bending are described by harmonic potentials67,68 The above model for the n-alkanes was developed and optimized by
Errington and Panagiotopoulos69,71
to fit experimental liquid-vapor equilibrium data. There are two key features to
the model. First, the methyl and methylene groups differ in size and possess
different energy well depths. In Table 1, it seems counterintuitive that a
methyl group should be smaller than a methylene group, but this is actually
consistent with other force fields designed for simulating n-alkanes.67,72
Second, adjacent united atoms within the same chain overlap by virtue of
specification of the equilibrium bond lengths. It has been shown that these are
essential requirements in order for a united atom model to reproduce the maxima
in critical pressure and density as a function of chain length.58 The
Buckingham exponential-6 potential was cut and shifted so that the force
vanishes smoothly at 15 Å. This was necessary because the energy minimization
procedure requires a continuous force for numerical stability. Although this
modification changes the potential slightly from its original form, it is
expected that deviations from the experimental properties for which the
parameters were optimized will be systematic (in the same direction) for all
carbon numbers. To construct the equation of state of the energy landscape for the
n-alkanes, either configurational-biased Monte Carlo (CBMC)73,74 Investigation of ultimate tensile strength via direct inherent structure
deformation was only performed for n-alkanes of length n < 48.
High-density inherent structures corresponding to PIS = 0 were
taken as the starting configurations. Each of these was expanded isotropically
stepwise by 5 kg/m3 and then its potential energy was minimized. This
process was repeated until a minimum in pressure as a function of density was
reached. For each chain length, results were averaged over fifteen such runs.
We have studied the ultimate isotropic tensile strength of the
n-alkane glasses by constructing their landscape equations of state.
Before proceeding, we first demonstrate that the Sastry point also corresponds
to a condition of fracture for complex molecular fluids, such as those
investigated here, and not just for atomic systems.43 Representative
inhomogeneous and homogeneous inherent structures for n = 8 from both
sides of the Sastry density are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. It is
clear that the fractured inherent structure, Figure 2, contains significant
cavity space, which not surprisingly resembles a crack in the system, whereas
the homogeneous inherent structure, Figure 3, is devoid of such defects. The
connection between the Sastry point and mechanical strength can be demonstrated
quantitatively by statistical geometric analysis of the void space78
present in the inherent structures as a function of density. In Figure 4, the
average inherent-structure pressure and void fraction are plotted as a function
of density for n = 8. As in the case for simple fluids, high density
inherent structures are spatially homogeneous above The equations of state of the energy landscape for the n-alkanes of
chain length n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 16, 24, and 48 are shown in Figure 5.
All of the curves have similar shapes and extend significantly into the negative
pressure region where the system is under isotropic tension. More importantly,
notice that pressure on the y-axis is given in units of kbar, which is
the same order of magnitude as the tensile strength of steel alloys.8
There are two important trends to glean from Figure 5, namely the chain length
dependences of Figure 6 shows that the Sastry density initially increases with chain length
but then reaches a plateau value at approximately n = 16. This nontrivial
chain length dependence is due to the fact that adjacent united atoms within the
same chain are actually interpenetrating spheres by virtue of the bonding
constraints in the simulation model. Consequently, the volume occupied by
m unbonded united atoms is larger than that of m bonded ones.
Because the Sastry density is the lowest density at which a mechanically stable
amorphous solid can exist absent of any void space, this limiting density should
at least initially increase with carbon number. Beyond some intermediate chain
length, the homogeneous amorphous packing problem that is associated with the
Sastry density becomes insensitive to carbon number. In other words, in the long
chain limit where n is large, a system composed of chains of length
n is indistinguishable from a system composed of chains of length
n+1 at least from a molecular packing point of view. This naturally gives
rise to an asymptotic approach to a limiting value of In Figure 7, the ultimate isotropic tensile strength, -PS,
is plotted as a function of inverse chain length. There are two striking
features to this plot. The first is the tensile strength maximum at n =
3, which is reminiscent of the maximum in critical pressure for the
n-alkanes at n = 2. The second is that the isotropic tensile
strength decreases with increasing carbon number beyond n = 3. In
contrast, we note that the average inherent structure energy per molecule at the
Sastry point (EIS( That the ultimate isotropic tensile strength should be maximized at n
= 3 is not obvious. Because fracture is initiated by voids,8,9 a
statistical geometric analysis of the n-alkane glasses at their Sastry
density was performed to see if the defects that drive mechanical failure could
provide physical insight into the origin of the tensile strength maximum.
Details of the geometric algorithm, which allows calculation of the volume,
surface area, and connectivity of voids, have been given elsewhere.78
The average void fraction and defect density are plotted as a function of
inverse chain length in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. It is interesting to see
that the void fraction at the Sastry density, Figure 8, behaves
non-monotonically with chain length. Although this quantity does not correlate
perfectly with tensile strength, it too displays an extremum at small chain
length. However, the defect density, which is defined as the number of cavities
per unit volume at the Sastry point, correlates quite well with tensile
strength, exhibiting a minimum near n = 3. The observation that the void
fraction and defect density at the Sastry point correlate with tensile strength
suggests that molecular packing effects play a basic role in determining the
relative ultimate mechanical strength of n-alkane glasses. This should
not be entirely surprising because the manner in which molecules pack together
directly affects their propensity to form voids and cavities which can lead to
failure. We have also determined the ultimate isotropic tensile strength by directly
deforming n-alkane inherent structures for carbon numbers n = 1,
2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 24. Recall that the computational procedure consists of a
series of isotropic expansion and energy minimization steps and, thus, closely
resembles the experimental protocol one would use to measure isotropic tensile
strength. These deformation curves are shown in Figure 10. In this case too, the
ultimate isotropic tensile strength corresponds to the minimum in pressure, and
the corresponding density is likewise analogous to the Sastry density.
Statistical geometric analysis also shows that this density signals the sudden
emergence of void space as the system is expanded isotropically. Although the
deformation curves and the equations of state of the landscape have similar
shapes, the deformation curves are noticeably sharper in the vicinity of the
pressure minimum, which is indicative of a brittle, catastrophic failure mode.
Interestingly, the density at which fracture occurs, as determined by both
constructions, is the same. We note that although each curve in Figure 10
represents an average over fifteen runs, the density at which each run fractured
occurred over a range of values around the Sastry density. Moreover, this
density range increased with chain length. In Figure 11, the tensile strengths
calculated by the two methods are plotted simultaneously for comparison. The
direct deformation process gives rise to a slightly greater tensile strength
than that obtained by isochoric energy minimization (the equation of state of
the landscape). Because the initial configuration of the deformation process is
itself an inherent structure, the intuitive expectation is that the process is
restricted at the outset to sample lower-lying energy basins. This is in
contrast to the isochoric quench procedure, in which higher-energy minima are
accessible during the high-temperature equilibration simulation that connects
points along the equation of state of the energy landscape. To the extent that
these lower-lying basins are closer to the ground state, and hence more
crystal-like than the higher-energy ones, they represent "stronger"
states.48 This difference aside, the deformation curves and the
landscape equation of state both predict the same nonmonotonic chain length
dependence for the tensile strength, with a maximum at n = 3. For
completeness, the defect densities at fracture for the two computational
protocols are shown in Figure 12. Again, results generated by the two processes
exhibit the same dependence on chain length. Also, in accord with the
expectation that the defect density should correlate with material strength, the
defect density at fracture by direct deformation is less than that observed in
the landscape equation of state. As before, this correlation suggests that the
nonmonotonic chain length dependence is related to molecular packing effects. In
Appendix A, a simple theory that captures this nontrivial behavior and exposes
the underlying physics is presented. Because the extent of chain entanglement increases with chain length, the
intuitive expectation is that ultimate tensile strength should increase with
carbon number. We again point to the work of Klein and
co-workers30-33 who have investigated the effect of topological
constraints, including chain entanglements and self-knots, on the rupture
strength of the unsaturated carbon-carbon bond in n-alkane molecules
ranging from n = 9 to n = 35. Their work suggests that chains of
length greater than n = 8 should contain topological interchain
entanglements, even though they might not exhibit rheological entanglement
dynamics. Although the topological problem of identifying chain entanglements at
the atomistic level remains unsolved,37,80-86 We now point out another interesting trend that can be seen in Figures 5 and
10. Looking at the equation of state of the energy landscape, Figure 5, it can
be seen that the curves become smoother with increasing chain length,
particularly on the low density side just after fracture. Although the
deformation curves, Figure 10, are fairly sharp near the fracture point, the
curvature clearly decreases with carbon number. This effect is a reflection of
increasing material toughness, that is to say resistance to mechanical failure
in the presence of a defect,88
with chain length. In Figure 13, the evolution of void space beyond the Sastry
density is shown for the isochoric energy minimization procedure. Notice the
systematic decrease in slope with increasing chain length, indicating that
systems composed of short chains are particularly susceptible to the creation of
void space. The same qualitative trends are observed for the direct deformation
process. Physically, the data point to the fact that systems composed of small
molecules are unable to accommodate "internal" void space and simply come apart
catastrophically. In contrast, as the density is lowered below the Sastry point,
chain molecules partially unbind to create void space, but the voids thus
created are not catastrophic. The constraints associated with chemical bonding
serve as "stitching points" that hold the system together. Consequently, because
the number of "stitching points" increases with chain length, it becomes
increasingly difficult to create cavity space beyond that already present at the
Sastry point. It has been shown that the Sastry point for simple fluids practically
coincides with the T = 0 limit of the superheated liquid spinodal and,
hence, bears a simple relationship to the critical point.42,44,48 In
Figure 14, the ratios of the Sastry density to experimental critical density and
the ultimate isotropic tensile strength to experimental critical pressure are
plotted as a function of chain length. The ratios for united atom methane ( The chain length dependence of the maximum in ultimate isotropic tensile
strength, -PS, within the family of n-alkane glasses is
a surprising result and has yet to be confirmed experimentally. Microscopic
theories designed to capture the liquid-vapor phase behavior of simple molecular
fluids, such as that of Sanchez-Lacombe,91
do not predict complex chain length dependence of the pressure in the T =
0 limit of the superheated liquid spinodal and thus the underlying physics is
not at all obvious. To elucidate the underlying physics, it is useful to examine
the relationship between tensile strength -PS and the cohesive
energy density In Appendix A, a simple theory capable of reproducing the maximum in cohesive
energy, and therefore tensile strength, is presented. Here, we briefly summarize
its key points. Notice in eq 18 that the ultimate isotropic tensile strength has
been decomposed into energetic and geometric contributions. Each is treated
separately in the theory. The energetic contribution to the cohesive energy
density is calculated by making an analogy to the conceptual framework of
lattice models where it is assumed each lattice site is occupied by a chain
segment. Invoking a simple mean field approximation, the average intermolecular
interaction energy per molecule can be calculated while accounting for different
characteristic interaction energies for the methyl and methylene groups. The
geometric contribution to the cohesive energy density, or the total volume of
the system, is approximated as a simple summation over all molecular volumes,
accounting for the fact that adjacent pairs of united atoms within the same
molecule overlap (i.e., they are interpenetrating spheres by virtue of chemical
bonding). Within this simple framework, the theory is not only able to reproduce
a maximum in cohesive energy density at n = 3, but also predicts that the
cohesive energy density, and therefore tensile strength, decreases with chain
length beyond n = 3 and approaches a finite asymptotic value as n
As shown in Appendix A, these simple arguments allow the cohesive energy
density to be written in the following general form A systematic study of the ultimate isotropic tensile strength of
n-alkane glasses up to n = 48 has been performed. We have shown
that the equation of state of the energy landscape and the inherent structure
deformation curve provide two independent measures of the isotropic tensile
strength for these glasses. In particular, it is the pressure minimum in both
curves that corresponds to the maximum isotropic tension that a system can
sustain prior to fracture. Although both methods predict the same density at
which fracture occurs, the deformation curve systematically predicts a higher
tensile strength than the landscape equation of state simply because the process
is biased to sample basins of lower energy. This difference aside, both
constructions exhibit similar trends with respect to the Sastry density and
tensile strength dependence on chain length. The Sastry density initially
increases with carbon number and then reaches a plateau value at some
intermediate carbon number. More interesting, however, is the nonmonotonic chain
length dependence of the ultimate isotropic tensile strength with a maximum at
n = 3, which is reminiscent of the maximum in critical pressure at
n = 2 for this homologous series. By relating the cohesive energy to
pressure in the zero-temperature limit, it can be shown by means of a simple
theory that the observed chain length dependence of the Sastry point is driven
by a competition between intermolecular energetic and intramolecular packing
effects. Although the results seem to contradict intuitive expectations
regarding the connection between mechanical strength and molecular structure, in
particular, the notion that strength should increase with chain length, the
crucial distinction between the actual experimental protocol and computational
methods used here is the following. Experimental measurements inevitably are
determined while the sample is deformed at an externally imposed strain rate,
and the measured strength is therefore a reflection of the dynamic response of
the system to a perturbation. It should therefore be expected that features such
as chain entanglements and even cross-links increase the experimentally observed
tensile strength. In this work, mechanical strength has been determined within a
purely static framework and ultimate strength corresponds to a limit of
mechanical stability. Because the computational protocols used in this work
correspond to an experimental measurement using an infinitely slow strain rate,
points of chain entanglements are always allowed to relax, and thus do not
influence the intrinsic tensile strength. From an interesting theoretical perspective, we have shown that the
relationship between the Sastry point and the critical point is more complex for
molecular than for monatomic fluids. Both ratios, A number of interesting issues are raised by this work and deserve further
investigation. Experimentally, the ultimate strength of a material usually
refers to its mechanical response under uniaxial loading. Shear strength is also
an important mechanical property in engineering applications. These particular
properties can be determined using the inherent structure formalism, and it
would be interesting to see if they exhibit complex chain length dependence. We
have also pointed out that the equations of state of the energy landscape and
the inherent structure deformation curves become smoother with carbon number,
particularly just after the point of fracture. This smoothing effect is believed
to be associated with "stitching points" provided by longer chain molecules by
virtue of chemical bonds which serve to hold the system together. The
implication of this subtle trend is that amorphous solids composed of longer
chains are mechanically tougher, that is to say less susceptible to mechanical
failure when a void defect is present, than shorter, smaller molecules.
Experimental studies of the chain-length dependence of toughness are necessary
to confirm or disprove this prediction. In this appendix, we present a simple mean-field theory capable of capturing
the qualitative behavior of the cohesive energy density, and therefore tensile
strength, as a function of chain length. The starting point for this theory is
eq 18 which decomposes the cohesive energy density into purely energetic and
geometric contributions, each of which is treated independently in what follows.
The total intermolecular interaction energy is calculated using a simple
mean-field approximation. To facilitate such a calculation, we make an analogy
to the conceptual framework of lattice models, where we crudely assume that each
chain segment occupies a lattice site. All sites are assumed to be occupied
because the system of interest is at its Sastry density, where the only voids
are interstitial. Surrounding each site are z near-neighbors. In this
work, we take the coordination number to be an adjustable parameter.94
For a chain of length n > 2, there are two CH3 groups and
(n-2) CH2 groups. Intermolecular methyl-methyl interactions
have a characteristic energy Because the Sastry point is the lowest density at which a homogeneous glass
can exist, that is to say it corresponds to the onset of void formation, the
total volume of the system is approximated as a simple summation over all
molecular volumes. Implicit in this approximation is the assumption that
although intermolecular overlaps do exist, the overlap volume occupies only a
small fraction of the total system volume which is largely composed of the
volume of the molecules themselves. The average molecular volume can be written
in the following general form It has already been pointed out in Section IV how packing effects relate to
the behavior of the Sastry density as a function of carbon number. However, more
intriguing is the ultimate tensile strength, and therefore cohesive energy
density, maximum at n = 3. The underlying physics that give rise to this
maximum can be elucidated by multiplying and dividing eq A11 by n P.G.D. gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the U. S. Department
of Energy, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office
of Basic Energy Sciences (Grant No. DE-FG02-87ER13714).


where
Kr = 96 500 K/Å2, K
= 62 500 K/rad2,
deq is a species-dependent equilibrium bond length, and
eq is the equilibrium bond
angle which is fixed at 114
.68
Equilibrium bond lengths for CH3-CH3,
CH3-CH2, and CH2-CH2 bonds are set
to 1.839, 1.687, and 1.535 Å, respectively.69
The dihedral angles are governed by a potential of the form70

where
V0 = 0, V1 = 355.03 K, V2
= -68.19 K, and V3 = 791.32 K. Within a chain, united atoms
separated by more than three bonds interact via the same nonbonded potential
that governs the interaction between united atoms on different molecules. In
this work, the nonbonded potential is described by the Buckingham exponential-6
potential

where
is the depth of the potential well,
controls the width of the
potential well, rmin is the distance at which the potential
reaches its minimum, and rmax is the smallest distance for
which dunb(r)/dr = 0, the position of a maximum
of the form shown in eq 6. A characteristic diameter
analogous to that of the Lennard-Jones
interaction potential corresponds to the distance at which
unb(r) = 0. The advantage of the Buckingham
exponential-6 form is that it offers an additional degree of freedom in
optimizing the model relative to the traditional Lennard-Jones potential. The
parameters for each united atom type are summarized in Table 1
. Interaction parameters between different
united atom types are obtained by standard arithmetic and geometric averages



The total
potential energy of the system,
, is
simply a summation over all of the above energetic contributions.
IV. Results and Discussion
S and inhomogeneous below. More
importantly, as the system is expanded isotropically, Figure 4 clearly shows
that the density at which cavities begin to form is practically coincident with
the density at which the minimum in pressure occurs, namely the Sastry density.
Notice that the size of these initial cavities is of the order of atomic
dimensions. Because harmonic bonding potentials are used here, bond rupture is
precluded as a viable fracture mechanism, and therefore, fracture in this case
is driven solely by the relative displacements of individual molecules. The loss
of cohesion below
S is
directly related to the creation of void space. The physical picture that
emerges from these observations is that the Sastry point corresponds to the
maximally stretched molecular glass, whereas the pressure at this point is its
ultimate isotropic tensile strength, or the maximum tension that can be
sustained just prior to fracture. Although results have only been presented for
n = 8, identical behavior is observed for all chain lengths investigated
in this work.
S and
-PS. For clarity, these two quantities are plotted separately
as a function of inverse chain length in Figures 6 and 7.
S in the limit of large
n.
S) < 0) decreases monotonically with carbon number
throughout the entire range of chain lengths studied. The tensile strength
results are quite remarkable because physical intuition would lead one to
believe that it should in fact increase with carbon number simply due to chain
entanglements. Although the degree of chain entanglement is unknown in these
systems, work by Saitta and Klein32 suggests that systems composed of
united atom n-alkanes are capable of exhibiting some degree of
topological chain entanglement starting at n = 9 even though they do not
display rheological entanglement dynamics. It has been found experimentally that
the ultimate tensile strength for amorphous low density, linear polyethylene
under uniaxial tension decreases with molecular weight.79
In reference to previous work on the ultimate isotropic tensile strength of
simple hydrocarbons,48 the complex chain length dependence found here
is consistent with the observation that chains of length n = 2 and 5
possess very similar tensile strength.

Figure 13 Evolution of void space beyond the Sastry density for the
equation of state of the energy landscape of the n-alkanes.
S/
C = 2.89,
-PS/PC = 34) are close to the corresponding
values for the Lennard-Jones fluid (
S/
C =
2.76, -PS/PC = 39.8). Although the
experimental critical density and pressure of the n-alkanes both depend
nonmonotonically on chain length, it is interesting to see that both
Sastry-to-critical point ratios increase monotonically with carbon number and
appear to diverge in the infinitely long chain limit. Vega and co-workers89,90
S/
C should indeed diverge in the
limit of large n. However, based on our tensile strength calculations, it
is not clear a priori how the ratio -PS/PC
should behave in the infinitely long chain limit. We can deduce that the scaling
exponent for -PS as a function of n is less than 3/2.
2 which
is defined thermodynamically to be

where
Uvaporization is the internal energy change of
vaporization for a volume of liquid VL. Physically,
2 is just a measure of the
strength of the intermolecular interactions in the liquid phase. If the vapor is
considered ideal, then the cohesive energy density reduces to

where
is the total intermolecular
interaction energy in the liquid. For small molecules and within small density
ranges, the cohesive energy density is proportional to the partial derivative of
the total internal energy of the liquid with respect to volume at constant
temperature92

where the
proportionality constant a is close to unity. In fact, for the van der
Waals fluid it is exactly unity. Using the differential form of the fundamental
equation U(S,V), where S is the entropy, and a
Maxwell relation,93
it is straightforward to show that

where
P is the
thermal expansion coefficient and
T is the isothermal compressibility. Exploiting the
fact that the equation of state of the energy landscape is the T = 0
isotherm for a liquid, the ultimate isotropic tensile strength becomes

A subtle
point to note in moving from eq 13 to 14 is that the Sastry point is a limit of
mechanical stability, and thus, both the thermal expansion coefficient and the
isothermal compressibility diverge there. It is therefore unclear how the ratio
of these two quantities behaves in the limit of the T = 0 superheated
liquid spinodal. However, we can deduce how the ratio
P/
T behaves in this
limit by examining its behavior for two model fluids with intermolecular
potentials that bracket the range of reasonable repulsive interactions in real
systems. To this end, the van der Waals fluid and the soft sphere fluid
consisting of an inverse ninth-power repulsion with a mean-field attraction were
examined. By definition, the ratio
P/
T is just the partial derivative of pressure with
respect to temperature at constant density (
P/
T)
. Because the equation of state of a fluid can generally be
expressed in terms of pressure as a function of density and temperature,
P(
,T), the total
differential of pressure is

Along the
liquid spinodal where (
P/
)T = 0, eq 15 reduces to

which states
that the pressure-temperature projection of the liquid spinodal curve is an
envelope of isochores.7 Using the chain rule, eq 16 can be rewritten
as

For the van
der Waals equation of state, one can show that the ratio
P/
T diverges at the
Sastry density in the limit of T = 0. However, it does so as
T-1/2, and so the term T(
P/
T) in eq 13 vanishes
as T
0. For the soft sphere fluid, we
have verified numerically that
P/
T does not diverge but approaches a finite value in
this limit. Therefore, we assume the general validity of this conclusion, and
assume that the first term on the right-hand side of eq 13 vanishes at the
Sastry density as T
0. It then
follows that

To test this
result, we plot the tensile strength against the corresponding cohesive energy
density in Figure 15. The linear correlation is quite good, suggesting that in
order to explain the tensile strength maximum at n = 3, one simply needs
to develop a theory for the chain length dependence of the cohesive energy
density.

Figure 15 Correlation between ultimate isotropic tensile strength
determined by the isochoric quench process and cohesive energy density for
the n-alkanes studied in this work.
.
Furthermore, when extended to calculate the Sastry density, the theory predicts
the same qualitative behavior as observed in the simulations, namely that
S initially increases with
carbon number and then reaches a plateau value.

where
(n) is defined as the negative of
the average intermolecular interaction energy per united atom within a chain,
and
(n) is the
intramolecular united atom, or carbon, density. The maximum in tensile strength
is just a reflection of the competition between these energetic and
intramolecular packing contributions. The average intermolecular interaction
energy per carbon
(n) decreases
with chain length simply because the characteristic interaction energy of a
methyl group is less than that of a methylene group, which is consistent with
other force fields used to simulate hydrocarbons. This tends to decrease
2 with increasing carbon
number. On the other hand, the average intramolecular carbon density behaves
much like the Sastry density and increases with chain length mainly due to
intramolecular packing effects, that is to say how the united atoms fit together
within a chain, and this tends to cause
2 to increase with carbon number. The consequence of this
competition naturally gives rise to a maximum. In the situation where the
characteristic energies of the methyl and methylene groups are equal, the theory
predicts that
2
increases monotonically with carbon number and should track the behavior of the
Sastry density. In fact, we have located the Sastry point for the
n-alkane simulation model with this energetic modification for n =
1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 16. We find that the Sastry density is largely insensitive to
the energetics of the model. More importantly, as predicted by the theory, the
ultimate isotropic tensile strength in this case initially increases with chain
length and then flattens out, much like the Sastry density.
V. Conclusions
S/
C and
-PS/PC, diverge in the infinitely long chain
limit. Combined with theoretical work by Vega and co-workers89,90
showing that the critical density and critical pressure for the n-alkanes
scale as n-3/2, this behavior should be expected in light of
the theory for tensile strength summarized in Section IV and presented in
Appendix A which predicts an asymptotic approach to a limiting value as n
. Appendix A: Mean-Field Theory for Cohesive Density
11, and methylene-methylene interactions are characterized
by an energy
22. A
geometric mean is used to define interactions between different united atoms

In a
mean-field sense, the probability, p1(n), that a
near-neighbor lattice site is occupied by a CH3 group of another
molecule is

Accordingly,
the probability, p2(n), that a near-neighbor site is
occupied by a CH2 group of another molecule is

The average
intermolecular interaction energy per molecule,
(n), due to near-neighbor interactions is therefore

Note that a
factor of has been included to account for double counting. Analogous
expressions for united atom methane and ethane can be easily derived. The total
intermolecular interaction energy for the system is

where
Nmol is the number of molecules in the system.

where
vtangent(n) is the average molecular volume calculated
by assuming the united atoms are tangent spheres and
voverlap(n) is the average total overlap volume between
adjacent sites in a chain and is important in this particular case because of
chemical bonding. For simplicity, only overlaps between adjacent pairs of united
atoms sites are considered. Given the schematic setup in Figure A1, the overlap
volume vo between two interpenetrating spheres of radii
r1 and r2 whose centers are separated by a
distance d is

where

and

The total
overlap volume within a molecule is therefore just a summation over all adjacent
united atom pairs. In the present context, the natural length scale is assumed
to be the radius of the united atom's exclusion sphere, which is of the order of
the Lennard-Jones diameter
. Such a
choice is consistent with the statistical geometric analysis already performed
that demonstrates the emergence of void space at the Sastry density. The radius
of a CH3 group is denoted by
1 and that of a CH2 group by
2. It naturally follows that
the system volume is

Combining eqs
18, A5, and A10, a closed-form expression for the cohesive energy density as a
function carbon number can be obtained

where the
proportionality constant a in eq 18 is taken to be of order unity. Notice
that the cohesive energy density is now expressed as the ratio of
single-molecule quantities. The relative sizes and characteristic energies of
the united atom types in the theory are set to be consistent with the simulation
model. The only adjustable parameters in the theory are the coordination number
z and equilibrium bond lengths, which are chosen to be species-specific.
To fit the cohesive energy data, the optimum values for the bond lengths between
CH3-CH3, CH3-CH2, and
CH2-CH2 groups were found to be 0.140, 0.590, and 0.265
1, respectively, for a
"coordination number" z = 51. We note that the value of z does not
affect the qualitative behavior as a function of chain length and only scales up
or down the value of the cohesive energy density. This is consistent with
previous studies that have shown using the coordination number as an adjustable
parameter does not affect qualitative trends but only serves to improve
agreement between theory and experiment.94 With these parameters, eq
A11 exhibits a maximum at n = 3. Beyond n = 3, the theory predicts
that the cohesive energy density actually decreases monotonically with carbon
number and approaches a finite value in the infinitely long chain limit. This
behavior is consistent with observed trends for solubility parameter
calculations in polymeric systems.95
Because the system volume at the Sastry point is calculated explicitly, the
theory can also be used to determine the Sastry density. It is straightforward
to show that the Sastry density predicted by this theory initially increases
with chain length and then reaches a plateau value in the long-chain limit.

where
(n) = -
(n)/n and
(n) = n/v(n). Physically,
(n) is just the intermolecular
energy per united atom within a chain, and
(n) is just the intramolecular united atom, or carbon, density.
As pointed out in Section IV, the maximum in tensile strength is a simple
consequence of the competition between these energetic and intramolecular
packing contributions. Because
22 <
11,
(n)
decreases with n. On the other hand, the average intramolecular carbon
density
(n) behaves much
like the Sastry density due to intramolecular packing effects and increases with
chain length. Therefore, the product of these two contributions gives rise to a
maximum. Although the present theory is by no means rigorous, it is a simple,
physically based theory that simultaneously captures the complex chain length
dependence of the tensile strength and Sastry density observed in our
simulations.
Acknowledgment
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pdebene@ princeton.edu.
Department of Chemistry, Princeton
University.
1. Kirk, R. E.; Othmer, D. F.; Kroschwitz, J. I.; Howe-Grant, M. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1992.
2. Franks, F. Biotechnology 1994, 12, 253.
3. Chaudhari, P.; Turnbull, D. Science 1978, 199,
11.
4. Greer, A. L. Science 1995, 267, 1947.
5. Zarzycki, J. Glasses and the Vitreous State; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York, 1991.
6. Angell, C. A. Science 1995, 267, 1924.
7. Debenedetti, P. G. Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1996.
8. Courtney, T. H. Mechanical Behavior of Materials; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1990.
9. Hertzberg, R. W. Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996.
10. Scherer, G. W. Relaxation in Glass and Composites; Wiley: New York, 1986.
11. Hill, R.; Milstein, F. Phys. Rev. B 1977, 15,
3087.
12. Nielsen, O. H.; Martin, R. M. Phys. Rev. B 1985, 32,
3780.
13. Roundy, D.; Krenn, C. R.; Cohen, M. L.; Morris, J. W. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 1999, 82, 2713.
14. Telling, R. H.; Pickard, C. J.; Payne, M. C.; Field, J. E. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 2000, 84, 5160.
15. Chacham, H.; Kleinman, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85,
4904.
16. da Silva, E. Z.; da Silva, A. J. R.; Fazzio, A. Phys. Rev. Lett.
2001, 8725, 6102.
17. Roundy, D.; Cohen, M. L. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 6421,
2103.
18. Selinger, R. L. B.; Wang, Z. G.; Gelbart, W. M. J. Chem. Phys.
1991, 95, 9128.
19. Wang, Z. G.; Landman, U.; Selinger, R. L. B.; Gelbart, W. M. Phys.
Rev. B 1991, 44, 378.
20. Selinger, R. L. B.; Wang, Z. G.; Gelbart, W. M.; Benshaul, A. Phys.
Rev. A 1991, 43, 4396.
21. Lynden-Bell, R. M. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1995, 7,
4603.
22. Lynden-Bell, R. M. Science 1994, 263, 1704.
23. Romano, A.; Li, J.; Yip, S. Physica A 2002, 304,
11.
24. Selinger, R. L. B.; Lynden-Bell, R. M.; Gelbart, W. M. J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 98, 9808.
25. Abraham, F. F.; Walkup, R.; Gao, H.; Duchaineau, M.; De La Rubia, T. D.;
Seager, M. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99,
5777.
26. Abraham, F. F.; Walkup, R.; Gao, H.; Duchaineau, M.; De La Rubia, T. D.;
Seager, M. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99,
5783.
27. Theodorou, D. N.; Suter, U. W. Macromolecules 1985,
18, 1467.
28. Theodorou, D. N.; Suter, U. W. Macromolecules 1986,
19, 379.
29. Theodorou, D. N.; Suter, U. W. Macromolecules 1986,
19, 139.
30. Saitta, A. M.; Soper, P. D.; Wasserman, E.; Klein, M. L. Nature
1999, 399, 46.
31. Saitta, A. M.; Klein, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1999,
111, 9434.
32. Saitta, A. M.; Klein, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000,
104, 2197.
33. Saitta, A. M.; Klein, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001,
105, 6495.
34. Termonia, Y.; Meakin, P.; Smith, P. Macromolecules 1985,
18, 2246.
35. Termonia, Y.; Smith, P. Macromolecules 1987, 20,
835.
36. Terzis, A. F.; Theodorou, D. N.; Stroeks, A. Macromolecules
2000, 33, 1385.
37. Terzis, A. F.; Theodorou, D. N.; Stroeks, A. Macromolecules
2000, 33, 1397.
38. Terzis, A. F.; Theodorou, D. N.; Stroeks, A. Macromolecules
2002, 35, 508.
39. Stillinger, F. H.; Weber, T. A. Phys. Rev. A 1982,
25, 978.
40. Stillinger, F. H.; Weber, T. A. Science 1984, 225,
983.
41. Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H. Nature 2001,
410, 259.
42. Debenedetti, P. G.; Truskett, T. M.; Lewis, C. P.; Stillinger, F. H.
Adv. Chem. Eng. 2001, 28, 21.
43. Sastry, S.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H. Phys. Rev. E
1997, 56, 5533.
44. Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H.; Truskett, T. M.; Roberts, C. J.
J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 7390.
45. La Nave, E.; Mossa, S.; Sciortino, F. Phys. Rev. Lett.
2002, 88, 225
46. La Violette, R. A.; Budzien, J. L.; Stillinger, F. H. J. Chem.
Phys. 2000, 112, 8072.
47. Roberts, C. J.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H. J. Phys. Chem.
B 1999, 103, 10
48. Utz, M.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H. J. Chem. Phys.
2001, 114, 10
49. Earnshaw, J. C.; Hughes, C. J. Phys. Rev. A 1992,
46, R4494.
50. Ocko, B. M.; Wu, X. Z.; Sirota, E. B.; Sinha, S. K.; Gang, O.; Deutsch,
M. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55, 3164.
51. Maeda, N.; Yaminsky, V. V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000,
84, 698.
52. Sloutskin, E.; Sirota, E. B.; Kraack, H.; Ocko, B. M.; Deutsch, M.
Phys. Rev. E 2001, 6403, 1708.
53. Gang, H.; Patel, J.; Wu, X. Z.; Deutsch, M.; Gang, O.; Ocko, B. M.;
Sirota, E. B. Europhys. Lett. 1998, 43, 314.
54. Farkas, A. Physical Chemistry of the Hydrocarbons; Academic Press: New York, 1950.
55. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70 ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, Ohio, 1989; pp v.
56. Lemmon, E. W.; Goodwin, A. R. H. J. Phys. Chem. Ref Data
2000, 29, 1.
57. Pamies, J. C.; Vega, L. F. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001,
40, 2532.
58. Vega, C.; MacDowell, L. G. Mol. Phys. 1996, 88,
1575.
59. Stillinger, F. H.; Weber, T. A. Phys. Rev. A 1983,
28, 2408.
60. Malandro, D. L.; Lacks, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997,
107, 5804.
61. La Nave, E.; Scala, A.; Starr, F. W.; Sciortino, F.; Stanley, H. E.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 4605.
62. Scala, A.; Starr, F. W.; La Nave, E.; Sciortino, F.; Stanley, H. E.
Nature 2000, 406, 166.
63. Kieffer, J.; Angell, C. A. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1988,
106, 336.
64. Lacks, D. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80,
5385.
65. Malandro, D. L.; Lacks, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1999,
110, 4593.
66. Gagnon, G.; Patton, J.; Lacks, D. J. Phys. Rev. E 2001,
6405, 1508.
67. Nath, S. K.; Escobedo, F. A.; de Pablo, J. J. J. Chem. Phys.
1998, 108, 9905.
68. Vanderploeg, P.; Berendsen, H. J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1982,
76, 3271.
69. Errington, J. R.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Phys. Chem. B
1999, 103, 6314.
70. Jorgensen, W. L.; Madura, J. D.; Swenson, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 6638.
71. Errington, J. R.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Chem. Phys.
1998, 109, 1093.
72. Martin, M. G.; Siepmann, J. I. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998,
102, 2569.
73. Siepmann, J. I.; Frenkel, D. Mol. Phys. 1992, 75,
59.
74. Frenkel, D.; Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2002.
75. Tuckerman, M. E.; Martyna, G. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000,
104, 159.
76. Martyna, G. J.; Tuckerman, M. E.; Tobias, D. J.; Klein, M. L. Mol.
Phys. 1996, 87, 1117.
77. Press, W. H. Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York, 1992.
78. Sastry, S.; Corti, D. S.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H. Phys.
Rev. E 1997, 56, 5524.
79. Popli, R.; Mandelkern, L. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys. 1987,
25, 441.
80. Edwards, S. F. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. a Mat. 1983, 385,
267.
81. Kavassalis, T. A.; Noolandi, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987,
59, 2674.
82. Iwata, K.; Edwards, S. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90,
4567.
83. Kremer, K.; Grest, G. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92,
5057.
84. Wool, R. P. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 1564.
85. Shaffer, J. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101,
4205.
86. Padding, J. T.; Briels, W. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2001,
115, 2846.
87. Doi, M.; Edwards, S. F. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics; Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press: Oxford Oxfordshire,New York, 1986.
88. Callister, W. D. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1994.
89. MacDowell, L. G.; Muller, M.; Vega, C.; Binder, K. J. Chem. Phys.
2000, 113, 419.
90. Vega, C.; McBride, C.; MacDowell, L. G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2002, 4, 853.
91. Sanchez, I. C.; Lacombe, R. H. J. Phys. Chem.-Us 1976,
80, 2352.
92. Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. The Solubility of Nonelectrolytes, 3rd ed.; Reinhold: New York, 1950.
93. Tester, J. W.; Modell, M. Thermodynamics and Its Applications, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997.
94. Kumar, S. K.; Suter, U. W.; Reid, R. C. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
1987, 26, 2532.
95. Spyriouni, T.; Vergelati, C. Macromolecules 2001,
34, 5306.
|
group, i |
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
3.741 |
160.3 |
15 |
|
CH3 |
3.679 |
129.6 |
16 |
|
CH2 |
4.000 |
73.5 |
22 |