Present:

Mr. Manish Vachharajani (Chair)
Ms. Sharon Bewick (Secretary)
Mr. Hany Girgis (Social Chair)
Ms. Brishti Guha (Social Chair)
 Mr. Murat Fiskiran (Athletics Chair)
Mr. Jose-Luis Gastanaga (Social Chair)
Mr. Alexander Bufetov (Treasurer)
Mr. Ori Heffetz (Events Chair)
Mr. João Boavida (very concerned resident)
Mr. Morten Kloster (somewhat concerned non-resident)

Mr. Eric Adelizzi (House Advisor)

 
Absent:
Ms. Caroline Nguyen (Bar Czar)
Mr. Phil Marfuta (Bar Czar)
Ms. Weining Man (Coffee House Manager)
 Mr. Batur Bicer (Regular Facilities Officer)
Ms. ?a Rennermalm (Regular Facilities Officer)
Mr. Lior Silberman (Assistant Chair)

Ms. Lisa Sherov (Residence Life Coordinator)
Ms. Holly Sanders (House Advisor)
 

Mr. Adelizzi was on time; Mr. Vachharajani was not.  Nevertheless, at approximately 6:55 pm, Mr. Vachharjani met Mr. Adelizzi at the meal hall, and granted Mr. Adelizzi permission to call the meeting to order.  In theory, this seemed like a good idea, but in practice, it was not.  Mr. Adelizzi tried to call the meeting to order three times, but with no success.  According to Mr. Adelizzi, “[Mr. Heffetz] was the only one who
listened.”

Luckily, Mr. Vachharajani arrived at 7:05, and successfully called the meeting to order.  The first question that Mr. Vachharajani asked was what old business (if any) needed to be taken care of.  Mr. Adelizzi (perhaps slightly miffed about being ignored) replied, “You saw the list I sent.”

The list he sent

HOUSE ADVISOR REPORT Eric Adelizzi April 14, 2003

Yes, Minister (continuing) attracts a small but loyal group of viewers. The
Chocolate Study Break on April 8th attracted a sizable and appreciative, if
transient, crowd.
 

HOUSE HISTORIAN REPORT Eric Adelizzi April 14, 2003

This Day in GC History --

April 14, 1964 -- The House Committee discusses plans for replacing the
vandalized cigarette machine.  The service may be discontinued.  The House
Committee also considers ceasing to give away free soap in the laundry
rooms.

April 14, 1976 -- The House Committee hosts Faculty Fellows Night.  35
Faculty Fellows and their spouses are invited for sherry and dinner.
 

HOUSE COMMITTEE WATCHDOG REPORT Anonymous [Umm?. perhaps this is not part of the list that Mr. Adelizzi sent? I will leave that to the reader to decide.] April 14, 2003
 

On September 30, 2003, House Committee Chair Manish Vachharajani agreed to
cross tabulate the data from the House Committee's survey on whether
breakfast should be served at the GC over the summer.  As far as I can
tell, we are still awaiting the results.  The survey asked residents, among
other things, whether they planned to stay in the GC over summer and
whether they wanted breakfast served over the summer.  Based on pure
percentages, the two questions yielded about the same percentages in favor.
It was agreed that the answers needed to be sorted to see what fraction of
those who will be here over the summer wanted food over the summer.  It is
now too late to do anything about it for this coming summer, but it would
be good to have the question answered to see what can be done for the
following summer.

Given some recent confusion over the Housing Inspection of the New GC
Laundry Room, I would like to suggest that every House Committee closet and
storage space be clearly marked "House Committee property -- contact
gchouse@princeton.edu with questions and comments" or some such nonsense.
We don't want a repeat of when someone -- we still don't know who --
removed the Committee's couches from the 34th entryway closet.  Speaking of
that Housing Inspection, does anyone know what those signs in the Laundry
Room mean?

I also gently remind the Committee about the T-Shirt contest, the Coffee
Service, the search for (and follow up on) the letters on Catering and Cup
Washing, the letter on rent itemization, the replacement of the ice cream
freezer, the letter on post-enrollment and housing, and the letter to the
Provost on the would-be soccer field.  Also, don't forget the idea of
installing a DVD player in the small OGC TV Room, especially with the New
GC TV Room closed.  What has been done about the dark room chemicals and
equipment?  How is the petition on the parking fee going?

I guess the Committee can drop the idea of writing a thank-you letter on
the telephone wiring, since it has been so long.  I also won't comment on
the New GC TV set repair issue, since I know this is under active
consideration -- or as active consideration as possible under the
circumstances.  We will shortly be reaching the one-year anniversary of its
breaking, though, and perhaps we can hold some sort of memorial ceremony to
commemorate the event.  Perhaps we should also follow the advice of former
Chair Matt Hindman and order a spare television set to be put to use
whenever one of the three televisions is broken, which is nearly always.

Mr. Vachharajani sighed. “Ah yes, the list.  There was one item on that list that was really important.? (Notice the deliberate use of italics? Mr. Vachharajani did not say, “there was one item on that list that was really important”; rather, he said, “there was one item on that list that was really important”.  Unfortunately, Mr. Vachharajani could not remember the one important item, thus he called upon Mr. Adelizzi to jog his memory.
Mr. Adelizzi, (still believing that all items were really important, began.  “Have you written a thank you letter for the telephone service?  (No)  Have you tabulated the summer breakfast survey?  (No)  Have you written to the food catering people?  (No)  Have you looked into the parking fee issue?  (No)  Have you drafted the letter about post-enrollment and housing?  (No)?” At this point, Mr. Vachharajani interrupted Mr. Adelizzi, saying, “Yes, that was the one!” (Mr. Vachharajani interested in housing?
Now that’s a surprise!).  Mr. Adelizzi merely replied, “I can go on.” Having reached the item of business that was really important, however, Mr. Vachharjani did not feel that this would be necessary.
 

RFO Report

In fact, Mr. Vachharajani didn’t even want to talk about post-enrollment housing.  Instead, he diverted attention from himself to the RFOs (this is a very typical tactic - when a conversation or discussion is making you look somewhat less than diligent, focus on people who are less conscientious than you… in this case, Mr. Vachharajani chose the RFOs, since neither were even at the meeting)  With no RFOs present, the discussion was brief.  All the same, there is no such thing as a HC meeting without at least some debate over the dryers.  It seems that the most recently purchased dryers are rated at 230 V, while the GC is on a 208 V system.  While this has caused some problems, Mr. Vachharajani was under the cheerful impression that all the dryers in the OGC were finally working.  Ms. Bewick squelched Mr. Vachharajani’s optimism, reporting that the 2nd dryer in the OGC was not “on”.  Mr. Vachharajani, although crushed by this news, found solace in the fact that at least one of the new dryers in the NGC was working.

Email Reports from the RFOs

1.  Vacuums. We have put in a new set of vacuums in the Porters Lodge. It
seems to work fine.

2. New GC Laundry

The new stacked dryer is hooked up. Tomorrow, Batur and I will see if we
can it tomorrow and put on a lock on the coinbox.
 

2 of the old dryers are down. Batur and I will check it and call for
repairs tomorrow morning.
 

3. Old GC laundry

I have asked the electric shop to attach the new stacked dryer to the power
system.
 

4. General stuff about the stacked dryers.

The electric shop informed me that the voltage of the machines (about 230V)
are not optimal for the electric system. Machines with 208V would be
optimal. The non optimal voltage reduce the machine effcicency. It might be
the reason why the machines are not as effective as the old dryers.

I have inquired the Housing department if it was possible to get 208V
dryers instead for the 230V. However, they only come in 230V. Apperantely
it is possible to make some adjustmenets to the dryers. Housing is going to
get back to me about how much it would cost.

5. Bank

Batur and I have decided to go to the bank tomorrow.
 
 

Mr. Vachharajani then returned to Mr. Adelizzi’s list.  He told the Committee that he has not yet drafted a letter about post-enrollment and the housing crisis.  Nevertheless, he promised that he would.  Mr. Vachharajani continued by telling everyone that he wasn?t sure what his own status would be the following year.  He suggested that the Committee reserve a draw slot for the chair.  If he ended up being post-enrolled, that draw slot would go to someone else – if, on the other hand, he was not post-enrolled, the draw slot would be his.  The next issue discussed was the shuttle.  Again, the HC decided that a letter was necessary.  With the post-enrollment letter looming large in Mr. Vachharajani’s mind, he did not really want the burden of writing yet another letter, thus he begged for volunteers from the Committee.  When no one offered, however, Mr. Vachharajani agreed to do it himself.  Mr. Girgis asked about the exact nature of the shuttle problem.  In reply Mr. Vachharjani told Mr. Girgis that, since beginning the shuttle service several months ago, the University has not seen a reduction in the number of cars parked in the Ivy Lane and Jadwin lots.  As a result, the University has decided to issue an ultimatum:  either grad students must stop parking in these lots, or else the University will discontinue the shuttle.  Mr. Vachharajani noted that this was a ridiculous demand.  He estimated that, prior to the shuttle service, there were approximately 2000 cars vying for 200 spots, but that, since the shuttle service started, there have been more like 1200 cars competing for the same 200 spots.  Mr. Vachharajani further noted that the grad student lots were completely full by 9:15 am in the pre-shuttle days, but have been filling up at approximately 10:00 am since the shuttle began operation.  Nevertheless, all 200 spots are used every day, thus there hasn’t actually been a reduction in parking.

Mr. Heffetz brought up an important point - change takes time.  According to Mr. Heffetz (who is in economics, and thus understands supply and demand), people will not sell their cars the moment a shuttle service becomes available (particularly if it is offered as a “trial” service).  Nevertheless, he believes that future grad students, in future years, will be far less likely to buy cars in the first place if a shuttle service exists.  Mr. Heffetz suggested that the university be a little more patient.  Mr. Heffetz also conveyed his belief that, in order to see change, the university needs to provide both a permanent and reliable shuttle.  He clarified this comment by citing countless mornings when he had personally observed grad students at Lawrence and Hibbon-Magie turned down because the shuttle was too full.  Obviously, under such circumstances, people become frustrated and start using their cars again.

Having established the fact that the shuttle service has and will reduce the “pressure” on the Ivy Lane and Jadwin lots (although not, perhaps, the “use” of these lots), the question then became exactly what the HC should fight for - parking spaces or a shuttle service.  Mr. Bufetov replied, “Both.” (Obviously, Mr. Bufetov was not aware of the subtle intricacies of the situation).  Mr. Vachharjani told Mr. Bufetov that the HC could “argue
for both, but they’ll say no.”  (By “they”, we can only assume that Mr. Vachharajani was referring to people in high places in the the administration).  A confused Mr. Bufetov threw his hands into the air and said, “What, what is this?  I don’t see the connection between a shuttle service and parking.” To this, Mr. Heffetz replied, “There is no connection.  The problem is that, to get the shuttle service in the first place, we said that there was a connection.  We told the University that a shuttle service would reduce the pressure on parking, but we were promoting an imaginary idea, and now we have to stick with it.” Mr. Vachharajani did not feel that the University would grant grad students both parking and a shuttle, thus he suggested choosing one or the other (or perhaps including alternative solutions).  Mr. Adelizzi reminded Mr. Vachharajani that the GSG had conducted a survey, and that the overwhelming response had been that grad students preferred parking spaces to a shuttle service.  Mr. Vachharajani did not feel that this survey was particularly relevant, since he believed that grad students were going to lose the parking spaces no matter what.  The real issue, then, was whether grad students preferred a shuttle or nothing at all… you don’t need a GSG survey to figure out the majority answer to that question.

Some members of the HC were slightly taken aback when Mr. Vachharajani told them that the parking spaces were a “non-issue” and that, within the next 5 years, they would be gone anyways.  Mr. Heffetz suggested more drastic measure to prevent such actions - in particular, he felt that lying in front of cars in the parking lot would be a good strategy.  He cited Israel, where lying in front of tanks has proven quite effective.  To this idea, Mr. Adelizzi replied, “Can we get tanks.? No one was quite sure exactly how Mr. Adelizzi planned on using the tanks - would we lie down in front of them, or would we get into them and storm the University?

Luckily, Mr. Adelizzi had a second suggestion that didn?t involve tanks.  He felt that one possible way to discourage parking and encourage shuttle use would be to charge a fee for parking on campus.  In return for imposing this fee, Mr. Adelizzi suggested abolishing the GC parking fee.  Mr. Adelizzi believed that this would prevent people from Butler, Lawrence and Hibbon-Magie (who currently pay nothing to park their cars) from parking on campus, but would not unduly punish GC residents who already pay $135 to park in the GC lot.  An $80 on campus fee was suggested.  Mr. Vachharajani
was skeptical - of course, the University would jump at the chance to charge an $80 on campus parking fee? but would they abolish the $130 GC fee?  - or would they charge both fees? - and was it worth paying both to keep the shuttle?  With a sigh, Mr. Heffetz said, “in the long run, everything will be taken away from us unless we fight for it - now the shuttle, then parking, then breakfast? and finally, dinner.”  Mr. Vachharajani agreed,
adding, “We must fight - although it may be taken away from us even if we fight.”  In the end, the HC came to the conclusion that the transportation problem came down to a question of which the University would be most likely to offer the graduate students - parking or a shuttle.  On the one hand, graduate student parking lots take up space - space that is desperately needed for faculty and staff parking, (especially since the town of Princeton is reticent to grant permits allowing the construction of new lots).  On the other hand, running a shuttle service costs money - money that could be spent printing Princeton Hallowe’en napkins and Princeton Valentine’s Day napkins in addition to the Princeton Christmas napkins that already exist.  While it is a toss-up, most members of the HC agreed that, given the choice, the University would rather spend money than space, thus in the end, parking would, indeed, be eliminated.  Given this, the wisest  solution would be to fight for a decent shuttle service at all costs.

Treasurer’s Report

Having thoroughly discussed the shuttle issue, the only items of business left were the reports from officers, and the concerned residents/non-residents.  Mr. Vachharajani turned to Mr. Bufetov - did he have anything to report?  Mr. Bufetov replied, saying “I have nothing to report.  We are in a very… er, delicate financial situation, but we should
be fine.” As a result of this “delicate” situation, Mr. Heffetz and Ms. Guha have not yet received reimbursement checks for some of their purchases.  Mr. Bufetov shook his head, and said “Yes, there have been some delays in processing the small things - but I hope all will be fine.” (Again, note the deliberate use of italics)  Mr. Vachharajani asked Mr. Bufetov if he had prepared the budget report.  Mr. Bufetov looked perplexed? “The budget report?” Mr. Vachharajani reminded Mr. Bufetov that he had asked for a complete budget report at the last meeting.  Mr. Bufetov then reminded Mr. Vachharajani that he had not been at the last meeting. (At this point, the secretary felt mild pangs of guilt for having been tardy when it came to publishing the minutes? then again, had Mr. Bufetov
been at the last meeting, he would not have needed the minutes.)
 

Social Chairs’ Reports

Having dealt with Mr. Bufetov, Mr. Vachharajani turned to the Social Chairs.  Mr. Gastanaga told the Committee that he had spent the past few days going through the movies in the Porter?s lodge.  Apparently, many of the movies that have been slated for the trash are actually recoverable. As a result, Mr. Gastanaga cleaned the videos and returned them (good as new) for use.  The same, unfortunately, cannot be said of the DVDs.  Several of the DVDs are badly scratched, and while they will still play in
the DVD player, they do not run as well in PCs.  At this point, Mr. Vachharajani mentioned doing something that might be considered mildly illegal.  As a result, the secretary has not chosen to divulge any details of the suggested operation, except to say that it would involve a Macintosh with a super-drive.  Ms. Guha did not have much to add to Mr. Gastanaga’s report - she told the HC that all was “going well”.

Mr. Girgis also reported to the Committee.  He announced that the Social Closet (which Mr. Silberman had complained about at the previous meeting), was now completely clean and organized.  He then mentioned that he may not be Social Chair for much longer.  With at least one House Advisor position is likely to be open soon, Mr. Girgis mentioned that he would be interested in becoming a House Advisor.  As a result, however, he would have to resign as Social Chair.  He suggested Mr. Horine or Mr. Bayraktar for Social Chair.

Emailed Reports from the Social Chairs

 Mr. Gastanaga

Tonight I have to leave at 7:45. My apologies in advance.

My Report:

1. I collected checks from the GC Video Club and gave them to the
treasurer.

2. I also requested the treasurer to update the numbers in the movie budget
to be sure we don't go over it.

3. I took care of the movies in the "damages" shelf. Some of them are
recoverable, some of them went to trash.

Mr. Girgis

 1.  The social chair closet is clean and organized.  The Halloween
and Christmas stuff has been moved to the top shelves so as not to get
crushed under the supplies for social hour.

2.  Social hour continues to go well.
 

Atheltics Chair’s Report

Mr. Fiskiran reported that he had nothing to add to his email.  He mentioned that a new pool table was scheduled to come in.  He also mentioned some problems with vandalism/theft of the pool tables and ping-pong tables.  The details of these problems (including suspects) were not discussed at the meeting.

Emailed Report from the Athletics Chair

1. A new ping-pong table arrived. It is currently in the mailroom. It will
not be used until the NGC common room renovation is completed.
 2. New pool cues were added to the Porter's Lodge.
 3. The pool table downstairs is still upside down and I'm working
assiduously to get it fixed and put back right. It may take some more time
however.
 

Events Chair’s Report

Mr. Heffetz report was brief.  He told the Committee that there would be karaoke at the Dbar that night, and that all performers would get free shots.  He also told the Committee that there would be a band at the Dbar the following Thursday.

House Advisor’s Report

Mr. Vachharajani was about to move on to concerned residents when Mr. Adelizzi interrupted him.  “What about the House Advisor?” he asked (could the House Advisor possibly have more items of business that were really important.)  “Oh yeah,” Mr. Vachharajani replied, “Does the House Advisor have anything to add to his report?” Mr. Adelizzi answered, “No.”

Concerned Residents/Non-residents

Mr. Kloster (a non-resident) was primarily concerned with the status of the NGC TV.  Mr. Vachharajani told him that the TV needed to be repaired, but that it would not be repaired under warranty, since the cost of moving it was astronomical and, as a result, required on site repair.  Mr. Vachharajani then added that it would be impossible to get at the TV until after May 21st anyhow due to the New GC kitchen construction.
 

Mr. Kloster, disappointed with the status and inaccessibility of the TV, asked if it would not, at least, be possible to move the DVD player from the NGC TV room.  Mr. Vachharajani told Mr. Kloster that it would be a possibility.  Mr. Adelizzi then suggested that a spare TV and a spare DVD player be purchased so that there would always be an extra around.  Mr. Vachharajani replied that the HC has a spare DVD player, but that the spare is currently in his room… and broken.

Although Mr. Kloster was not particularly satisfied with the status of either the TV, or the DVD player, there was not much further to be said on the issue.  As a result, it was Mr. Boavida?s turn to speak.  Mr. Adelizzi may have had a list, but Mr. Boavida had a longer list.  (The secretary will leave it up to the reader to decide if anything on Mr. Boavida’s list was really important).  The first issue that Mr. Boavida brought up was the whole problem with the audits.  The audits are not finished. Mr. Boavida implied that this might be, in fact, because Mr. Bufetov insisted on doing the audits year by year, rather than making a three year report.  (Audits had not be conducted for the past three years.  Mr. Boavida, one of the auditors, wished to complete all three audits together and then issue one report.  Mr. Bufetov apparently released only one year's worth of documentation, making this plan difficult.)  Mr. Vachharajani questioned Mr. Bufetov, asking whether he was withholding information from the auditors.  Mr. Bufetov waffled a bit, and then replied with “People are coming to my room in the middle of the night!” Mr. Heffetz
asked, “Are they nice?” Mr. Bufetov replied, “Invariably.” (What are we talking about now? - again, italics are used deliberately)  Mr. Adelizzi was skeptical, asking exactly what Mr. Bufetov considered the “middle of the night? 9:00 am?” Mr. Bufetov replied, “About that.” Mr. Boavida told  the Committee that there was no point in reporting further on the matter? Mr. Boavida also told the Committee that he did not believe that Mr. Bufetov even had (italics) all the necessary information.

Mr. Boavida’s concerns didn’t end at the audits.  The next item of business on his list was reminding Housing that they had promised to convert several doubles back to singles (these were converted in March 2001.  At the previous meeting, Mr. Adelizzi had suggested reminding Housing of their promise to reconvert the rooms from doubles to singles.)  Mr. Vachharajani told Mr. Boavida that the issue had been discussed with Housing, and that housing had agreed to convert the doubles back to singles not this year, but next year.  He also added that the HC should get some form of a written statement along those lines.

Mr. Boavida then asked about getting the new laundry prices into the Housing Booklet (apparently these were not updated last year).  Mr. Adelizzi told the HC that the reason the prices were wrong in last years Housing Booklet was because they had missed the deadline last year.

Mr. Boavida then asked about the chairs in Procter Hall (You mean not everyone enjoys sitting in the ?toilet? seats?)  Mr. Adelizzi reminded the Committee that they had requested the repair of the chairs through Major Maintenance in the fall.  The request had been denied but referred to Dining Services.  Director of Dining Services Stu Orefice promised to repair the chairs, but nothing further had been heard.

Mr. Boavida was also concerned about on-line registration, and how Dbar stickers would be handed out given this new process.  Mr. Heffetz said, “Same as we do every year - you go to the bar to pick them up.” Mr. Girgis mentioned charging a mandatory membership to the GC and having it charged to grad students’ accounts ($10 for off campus students) - he suggested that, if all students were put on the mailing list, all students could be given stickers, and the legal problems with Dbar membership would be avoided.  There was some discussion about the ongoing issue of finding a legal way to open the bar to all graduate students.  Someone pointed out that the the University now seemed willing to charge student accounts for the non-resident membership fee, something they had refused to do in the past.

Mr. Boavida then mentioned the Dbar webpage.  While this is Ms. Nguyen’s
job, Mr. Heffetz told the committee that he and Ms. Nguyen and Mr. Marfuta
are looking in to updating the webpage - He also told the committee that Mr. Silberman was looking into updating the email list.

 Mr. Boavida then asked about the HC international calling plan that was discussed at a HC meeting in September 2001.  At that time, the Committee had talked about discontinuing the service because no one was using it and the Committee was paying $5 per month for the right to offer the service. Former Regular Facilities Officer Konstantinos Drakakis had volunteered to look into the plan but never reported back to the Committee.  Mr. Vachharajani told Mr.  Boavida that international calling cards could now be purchased from Asian food stores (and elsewhere) at half the price, thus the issue was not really important.  Mr.  Boavida suggested removing the international calling plan from the webpage.  Mr. Adelizzi asked whether or not the HC was still paying the $5/mo fee but, the Treasurer being absent at this point, no one could answer definitively.  Mr. Vachharajani thought that the fee was no longer being paid.

Mr. Boavida’s next item of concern was an idea raised on May 27th and August 19th 2002 - At these HC meetings, there had been a suggestion to itemize rent bills.  Mr. Vachharajani thought that this would be a good idea since, every year, the total bill is raised 3-5% without any thought being given to exactly what that means.  As an example, Mr. Vachharajani explained - when he first got here, you could buy a meal plan with 12 meals, or a meal plan with 12 meals +100 points.  The second option cost $100
dollars more - which made sense, since each point is worth $1.  When the 5% inflation hit, however, it hit everything, thus the cost of purchasing 12 meals + 100 points was then $105 more than the cost of purchasing 12 meals. In other words, each $1 point ended up costing $1.05.  Mr. Heffetz told Mr. Vachharjani that he had failed to seize a great opportunity - clearly, housing points were the best investment in the market.  Mr. Adelizzi said, “Yes, if you could only sell them.”

Mr. Boavida then brought up an idea raised at a HC meeting in July of the previous year - at that particular meeting, someone had suggested putting signs on the inside of all doors to HC closets, in order to inform university staff of the contents of the room. Mr. Adelizzi thought that this would be a good idea and, using Mr. Fiskiran told Mr. Fiskiran that he should, for instance, put a sign on his closet.  Mr. Fiskiran didn’t think he had a closet.  Mr. Adelizzi disagreed.  Mr. Fiskiran brought up the subtle difference between a wood room and a closet.  Mr. Vachharajani reminded the secretary that her responsibility would be the Records Room - which was once the Sewing Room.  Mr. Adelizzi then asked if it would not be a good idea to move the sewing machine down to the Porter’s lodge.  Mr. Vachharajani thought that that would be a great idea, if the sewing machine bag could be found.  Finally, there was the dark room.  Apparently, former Social Chair, Mr. Buchanen is the only person who really knows about the dark room.  Mr. Adelizzi suggested talking to him, and having some of the chemicals disposed of, considering that the darkroom was going to be permanently closed down as part of the New GC kitchen work.  No one knew
where the chemicals were.  Mr. Adelizzi was afraid that keeping the chemicals after the closure of the darkroom might violate some EPA rules.

 The meeting was adjourned at 7:55.  The next meeting will be Monday, April
28, 2003.

Emailed Report from the RLC

I may not be at tonight's meeting. My apologies, in advance, if I cannot
make it.

Past Events: 4/3- Etiquette Reception- over 60 people attended, very well
received. 4/7- GSAW Ice cream social- good attendance despite the snow
4/10- La Boheme- Sold Out 4/11- GSAW Free Lunch- Over 200 participants

Upcoming events: 4/15- High Table with Georgia Nugent 4/17- Game Night
4/19- Easter Party 4/24- Organ Lunch

D-Bar Liquor License: I received the following e-mail from Linda Clos,
regarding the D-Bar license. Does the HC write these checks? If so, here is
the info and please let me know when they are ready. If not, do you know
who does?

Hi Lisa, I thought I'd give you advance notice regarding the checks we need
for the license. I need one check made payable to Borough of Princeton for
$350.00 and one check made payable to Division of ABC for $100.00. If you
could have them ready by the middle of May that would be great. Thanks.
Linda
 
 

Emailed Report from the second House Advisor

I really have nothing to add to Eric's report.  Our current Wednesday tv
series will end soon.  Are there any suggestions for a new one? I also
might not be able to make tonight's meeting.
 

Respectfully submitted by, Sharon Bewick