Instructions to BBS Commentators
Articles that have been accepted for publication in BEHAVIORAL AND
BRAIN SCIENCES (BBS) have been judged by 5-8 referees to be appropriate
for Open Peer Commentary, the special service provided by BBS to
investigators in psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology and
cognitive sciences who wish to solicit multiple responses from an
international group of fellow specialists within and across the BBS
disciplines to a particularly significant and controversial piece of
work.
If you have just been formally invited to submit a commentary we
would greatly appreciate your replying by email to bbs@soton.ac.uk
WITHIN 3 DAYS to let us know whether or not you will be able to
contribute a commentary. If there are additional commentators you wish
to recommend for this article, please note them in your email, together
with their email address.
- Please email us within 3 days, indicating whether you wish to submit a commentary.
- Before preparing your commentary, please read carefully the full
Instructions for Authors and Commentators as well. You may also find it
helpful to examine a recent issue of BBS.
- Email is now the medium by which BBS transfers and processes all of its
material, from the first draft of the target article, through open peer
commentary, to the author's response and final publication. We now no
longer process hard copies (with their associated snail-mail delays),
so these no longer need to be sent. Instead, and in order to facilitate
the time-consuming and complex process of Open Peer Commentary (with up
to 150 active commentaries at any one time), we now archive online
drafts of the submitted commentaries on a hidden BBS website,
accessible only to the target article authors.
Consequently, commentaries can only be accepted in the following
format:
DOUBLE-SPACED text-only with line-breaks (.txt).
FIGURES should be separate (.gif or .jpg) and equations
should be in text or TeX. Send to: bbs@soton.ac.uk
In addition, please make sure your commentary has ALL of the following
(in this order, please):
1. THE NAME OF THE AUTHOR(S) OF THE TARGET ARTICLE
2. AN INDEXABLE AND INFORMATIVE COMMENTARY TITLE
FOR ALL AUTHORS OF THE COMMENTARY:
3. FULL NAME(S)
4. INSTITUTIONAL ADDRESS(S),
5. EMAIL ADDRESS(ES)
6. HOME PAGE URL(S) where available
7. 60 word ABSTRACT
8. MAIN TEXT (~1000 words)
9. ALPHABETICAL REFERENCE LIST (APA STANDARD)
- BBS's rigorous timetable constraints (requiring the
coordination of target articles, commentaries, and authors' responses
within the publishing queue) make it impossible for us to process
follow-up drafts of commentaries. Please make sure what what you submit
is the carefully checked final draft to which you wish the author to
respond; second thoughts will require removing your commentary from the
queue and holding it over for a later issue. (Small nonsubstantive
corrections, not affecting the author's response, may be possible at a
later stage, when you are sent the edited copy to review, but not
before.)
- Commentaries should be limited to ONE THOUSAND WORDS (references
included). Please do not devote the limited space in your commentary
to recounting the contents of the target article. Portions of
commentaries redundant with the target article or with other accepted
commentaries may have to be deleted by the editor. (When commentaries
duplicate one another, priority will be assigned in terms of order of
receipt.) BBS also reserves the right to edit commentaries for
relevance and style. In the interest of speed, commentators will only
be sent the edited copy for review when there have been major editorial
changes. If necessary, commentaries will be formally refereed.
- Please provide an INFORMATIVE, INDEXABLE TITLE for your commentary.
As many commentators will address the same general topic, your title
should be a distinctive one that reflects the gist of your specific
contribution and that is suitable for the kind of keyword indexing used
in modern bibliographic retrieval systems. With around 150 active
commentaries at any one time, it is also extremely helpful to us if you
indicate at the very top of your commentary the name of the
target-article authors on whom your are commenting. (There is no need
to cite the entire target article, just the name of the authors will
do.)
- Your commentary must include an ABSTRACT (of ABOUT 60 WORDS),
summarising as specifically as possible the content of your
contribution.
- Please provide your (i) FULL INSTITUTIONAL ADDRESS, your (ii) EMAIL
ADDRESS and your (iii) WORLD WIDE WEB HOME-PAGE URLs, as well as those
of your commentary co-authors.
- Commentaries must be submitted by EMAIL as DOUBLE-SPACED text-only
with line-breaks (.txt). Figures should be accompanying .gif or .jpg
files; equations should be in text of TeX.
Please email this to bbs@soton.ac.uk
With many thanks for cooperation in this project.
Stevan Harnad,
Editor Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
bbs@cogsci.soton.ac.uk
phone: +44 703 594-583
fax: +44 703 593-281
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs
ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu/11/.libraries/.pujournals