The precept runs concurrently with History 291, "The Origins
of Modern Science", and the following syllabus supplements
the reading and lectures of that course. The purpose of the
graduate precept is to examine at an advanced level current
scholarship on the major issues that constitute the
"Scientific Revolution" as a subject of historical
inquiry and that inform the basic structure of the undergraduate
course.
| Session 1: Introduction | The following works deal with early modern science as
a whole and are worth consulting over the course of the
semester:
A.R. Hall, The Revolution in Science, 1500-1750 (the third edition [1983] of a classic dating from the '50s)Over the semester we will take up many of the themes covered by the contributors to David C. Lindberg and Robert S. Westman, Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, a collection of interpretive articles that participants may find helpful in orienting them to specific readings below. On the historiographical question of the "Scientific Revolution", see
|
| Session 2: Aristotle's
World: Ancient and Medieval |
Aristotle, Physics, Books 2 and
3 Marjorie Grene, A Portrait of Aristotle, Chaps. 3 and 4 G.E.L. Owen, et al., "Aristotle", in Dictionary of Scientific Biography David C. Lindberg, ed., Science in the Middle Ages, Chaps. 3 (Wallace), 7 (Murdoch and Sylla), and 8 (Grant) Maurice Clavelin, The Natural Philosophy of Galileo, Chap. 2 Edward Grant, "Aristotelianism and the Longevity of the Medieval World View", History of Science 16(1978), 93-106; repr. in Grant, Studies in Medieval Science and Technology, Chap. XVI; cf his Planets, Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687 General: David C. Lindberg, The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450, is an excellent survey of the scientific world view overturned in the Scientific Revolution. For discussion: The aim and structure of Aristotelian natural philosophy |
| Session 3: Copernicus:
The Last Ptolemaean? |
G.J. Toomer, "Ptolemy", DSB;
cf. his Ptolemy's Almagest Otto Neugebauer, "On the Planetary Theory of Copernicus", in Arthur Beer (ed.), Vistas in Astronomy 10(1968), 89-103 (in Astrophysics Library, SO 8402.161, or Fine Hall Library, SK 8402.161); repr. in Neugebauer, Astronomy and History: Selected Essays J.R. Ravetz, Astronomy and Cosmology in the Achievement of Nicolaus Copernicus Noel Swerdlow & Otto Neugebauer, Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus' De Revolutionibus, Part I, Chap. 1, 3-85; cf. Swerdlow's earlier study, "The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus's Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary", Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 117(1973), 423-512 Curtis Wilson, "Rheticus, Ravetz, and the 'Necessity' of Copernicus' Innovation", in R.S. Westman (ed.), The Copernican Achievement E.J. Aiton, "Celestial Spheres and Circles", History of Science 19(1981), 75-114 R.S. Westman, "The Astronomer's Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study", History of Science 18(1980), 105-147 ----- "Proof, poetics, and patronage: Copernicus's preface to De revolutionibus", in Lindberg and Westman, Reappraisals, Chap.4 For
discussion: |
| Session 4: Art,
Engineering, and Science in the Renaissance |
Giorgio de Santillana, "The Role of
Art in the Scientific Renaissance", in
M. Clagett (ed.), Critical Problems in the
History of Science; repr. in Santillana, Reflections
on Men and Ideas Guglielmo Righini, "New Light on Galileo's Lunar Observations" in M.L. Righini Bonelli and William R. Shea, Reason, Experiment, and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, 59-76; cf. commentaries by Owen Gingerich and Willy Hartner immediately following. Samuel Y. Edgerton, "The Renaissance Artist as Quantifier", in Margaret A. Hagen (ed.), The Perception of Pictures, I, 179-212; cf. his The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective Michael S. Mahoney, "Diagrams and Dynamics: Mathematical Perspectives on Edgerton's Thesis", in John W. Shirley and F. David Hoeniger (eds.), Science and the Arts in the Renaissance, Chap. 10 [online] and "Drawing Machines", in in Picturing Machines, 1400-1700, ed. Wolfgang Lefebvre (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004) [online] Eugene S. Ferguson, "The Mind's Eye: Non-Verbal Thought in Technology", Science 197(1977), 827-836 [online]; cf his Engineering and the Mind's Eye (MIT, 1992) Bertrand Gille, Engineers of the Renaissance Bert S. Hall, "'Der Meister sol auch kennen schreiben und lesen': Writings about Technology, 1400-1600, and their Cultural Implications", in Early Technologies (ed. D. Schmandt-Basserat) [online] S. Drake and I.E. Drabkin, The Science of Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Read introduction and Tartaglia, Nova Scientia; skim other texts to get a sense of their style and content Bruce T. Moran, "German Prince-Practitioners: Aspects in the Development of Courtly Science, Technology, and Procedures in the Renaissance," Technology and Culture, 22(1981), 253-274; cf. his "Princes, Machines, and the Valuation of Precision in the 16th Century", Sudhoffs Archiv 61(1977), 209-228 David Goodman, "Philip II's Patronage of Science and Engineering," British Journal for the History of Science, 16(1983), 49-66 For
discussion: |
| Session 5: Galileo
at Work | Maurice Clavelin, The Natural
Philosophy of Galileo, Chap. 3; cf. also
his "Conceptual and Technical Aspects of the
Galilean Geometrization of the Motion of Heavy
Bodies" in Nature Mathematized
(ed. W.R. Shea), 23-50, with Shea's commentary,
51-60 Stillman Drake, Galileo at Work, Chaps. 2-7, 19-20 Galileo's Notes on Motion (skim for argument underlying Drake's ordering of the manuscripts being presented) (cf. the online edition done by the Max Planck Institute in Berlin and the Istituto e Museo di Storia delle Scienze in Florence. "Galileo's Discovery of the Law of Free Fall", Scientific American 228,5(1973), 84-92 and James MacLachlan, "Galileo's Discovery of the Parabolic Trajectory", ibid. 232,3(1975), 102-110 William A. Wallace, Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo's Science, Chaps. 4 and 5, and part 3 of Chap. 6 (read for main argument and nature of evidence adduced) Thomas B. Settle, "Galileo and Early Experimentation", in Springs of Scientific Creativity (ed. R. Aris, H.T. Davis, R.H. Steuwer), Chap.1 "An Experiment in the History of Science", Science 133(1961), 19-23 "Galileo's Use of Experiment as a Tool of Investigation", in Galileo, Man of Science (ed. E. McMullin), 315-337 Winifred L. Wisan, "The New Science of Motion: A Study of Galileo's De motu locali", Archive for History of Exact Sciences 13(1974), 103-306 (Read for main line and style of argument) A.G. Molland, "The Atomisation of Motion: A Facet of the Scientific Revolution", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13(1982), 31-54 M.S. Mahoney, "The Mathematical Realm of Nature", in D.E. Garber et al.(eds.), Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Vol. I, pp. 702-55; esp. 706-710 ("2.2 Galileo and the New Science of Motion"). Mario Biagoli, Galileo, Courtier For discussion: |
| Session 6: From
Magic to Science |
Paolo Rossi, Francis Bacon:
From Magic to Science Benjamin Farrington, The Philosophy of Francis Bacon Brian Vickers (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance Charles Webster, From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science cf. the essay review of Vickers' and Webster's books by Patrick Curry, "Revisions of Magic and Science", History of Science 23(1985), 299-325 Allen G. Debus, The Chemical Philosophy: Paracelsian Science and Medicine in the 16th and 17th Centuries, I, Chaps. 1-3 Owen Hannaway, The Chemists and the Word For discussion: What are the Baconian themes that point to a transition from magic to science, and what difference did they make to the practice of natural philosophy? |
| Session 7: Truth,
Light, and Science |
(In addition to Mersenne's Truth of
the Sciences and Descartes' Optics, set out
for this week's reading in the undergraduate syllabus,
please look ahead to the opening chapters of Descartes'
The
World) Richard H. Popkin, The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza (use the second edition of 1979) E.M. Curley, Descartes Against the Skeptics Nicholas Jardine, "The Forging of Modern Realism: Clavius and Kepler against the Sceptics", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 10(1979), 141-173 Peter Dear, "Marin Mersenne and the Probabilistic Roots of 'Mitigated Scepticism'", Journal of the History of Philosophy 22(1984), 173-205 Daniel Garber, Descartes Embodied, 85-110 ("Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and Essays" and 111-129 ("Descartes on Knowledge and Certainty: From the Discours to the Principia") Philip R. Sloan, "Descartes, the Sceptics, and the Rejection of Vitalism in Seventeenth-Century Physiology", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8(1977), 1-28 For discussion: What light does the crise pyrrhonienne shed on Descartes' scientific career, in particular his optics and his cosmology of light, and conversely? |
| Session 8: The
Mechanical Philosophy | R. Descartes, The World
(trans. M.S. Mahoney) [
online] Isaac Newton, Principia mathematica, General Scholium Marie Boas Hall, Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy, Part I, Chap. 3; Part II, Sect. 2 ("The Mechanical Philosophy") Robert H. Kargon, Atomism in England from Hariot to Newton Keith Hutchison, "What happened to occult qualities in the Scientific Revolution?", Isis 73(1982), 233-253 "Supernaturalism and the mechanical philosophy", History of Science 21(1983), 297-333 D.J.deS. Price, "Automata and the origins of mechanism and the mechanistic philosophy", Technology and Culture 5(1964), 9-23 Graham Rees, "Atomism and 'subtlety' in Francis Bacon's philosophy", Annals of Science 37(1980), 549-571 John W. Lynes, 'Descartes' theory of elements: From Le Monde to the Principes", Journal of the History of Ideas 43(1982), 55-72 Frederick J. O'Toole, "Qualities and powers in the corpuscular philosophy of Robert Boyle", Journ. Hist. Phil. 12(1974), 295-325 T.S. Kuhn, "Boyle and Structural Chemistry in the 17th century", Isis 43(1952), 12-36 For discussion: What do machines have to do with corpuscles? |
| Session 9: Harvey
and Circulation |
Robert G. Frank, Jr., Harvey
and the Oxford Physiologists: Scientific Ideas and
Social Interaction (1980) Gweneth Whitteridge, William Harvey and the Circulation of the Blood (1971) Jerome J. Bylebyl, "The Growth of Harvey's De motu cordis", Bulletin of the History of Medicine 47(19 ), 427-70 Peter W. Graham, "Harvey's De motu cordis: The Rhetoric of Science and the Science of Rhetoric", Journal of the History of Medicine 33(1978), 469-476 Andrew Wear, "William Harvey and the 'Way of the Anatomists'", History of Science 21(1983), 223-249 [To get a sense of the literature on Harvey see the collection assembled by I.B. Cohen, Harvey Studies (1981)] For discussion: |
| Session 10: The
Experimenters |
Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, Leviathan
and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental
Life T.S. Kuhn, "Mathematical vs. Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7(1976), 1-31; repr. in his The Essential Tension W.E.K. Middleton, The Experimenters: A Study of the Accademia del Cimento (including trans. of the Accademia's Saggi di naturali esperienze, also available in trans. of Richard Waller, Essayes of Natural Experiments Made in the Academie del Cimento) Barbara Shapiro and Robert G. Frank, English Scientific Virtuosi in the 16th and 17th Centuries (cf. Frank's Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists, Chap. 6) Peter Dear, "Totius in verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society", Isis 76(1985), 145-161 Steven Shapin, "Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology", Social Studies of Science 14(1984), 481-519 D.J.deS. Price, "The Manufacture of Scientific Instruments from c.1500 to c.1700", in Chas. Singer et al., History of Technology, III, 620-641 M.S. Mahoney, "Mariotte, Edme", in Dictionary of Scientific Biography For discussion:
|
| Session 11: The
New Societies: Collaboration and Conflict
|
[The 291 readings on the
Mariotte-Pecquet and Newton-Hooke disputes are
particularly pertinent to this week's discussion.] Martha Ornstein, The Role of Scientific Societies in the 17th Century Michael C. Hunter, Establishing the New Science : The Experience of the Early Royal Society The Royal Society and its Fellows, 1660-1700: The Morphology of an Early Scientific Institution Charles Webster, The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626-1660, Chap. 2 Roger Hahn, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803, Chaps. 1-2 Alice Stroup, A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage, and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences Edme Mariotte, Essay de logique, contenant les principes des sciences et la manière de s'en servir pour faire des bons raisonnements (Paris, 1678), in Oeuvres de Mariotte, II, 609-701 K. Theodore Hoppen, The Common Scientist in the 17th Century: A study of the Dublin Philosophical Society, 1683-1708 For discussion:
|
| Session 12: Falling
Bodies, Pendulums, and Moons |
René Descartes, [Laws of impact
from Principles of Philosophy] Christiaan Huygens, "On the Motion of Bodies Resulting From Impact", "On Centrifugal Force", and "On the Center of Oscillation" Isaac Newton, Principia mathematica, Preface; Definitions; Axioms or Laws of Motion; and Book I, Section II Richard S. Westfall, Force in Newton's Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the 17th Century (Obviously, you cannot read the whole of this massive work, nor even major portions of it; try, however, to get a sense of its main themes and of the problem-structure of mechanics at the time. For some assistance in this, cf. the review by E.J. Aiton, "The Concept of Force", History of Science 10(1971), 88-102) E.J. Aiton, The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motion (ditto; look over for main theme) D.T. Whiteside, "The Mathematical Principles Underlying Newton's Principia mathematica", Journal for the History of Astronomy 1(1970), 116-138; sep. as 9th Gibson Lecture in the History of Mathematics, Glasgow, 1970 For discussion: What were the major lines of inquiry that produced the new mechanics, and how did each particular set of problems shape the results that flowed from it? |