Social
insects


|
Collaborator,
Prof. Nigel. R. Franks (University of Bristol) |
Ant foraging networks are used to transport resources
and/or information during foraging, and also for exploration, emigration
and for coordinating colony defence. Just as the functioning and
success of modern cities is dependent on an efficient transportation
system, the effective management of traffic is essential to insect
societies. Furthermore, networks are ubiquitous in nature, and the
efficiency of such networks may determine the fundamental scaling
properties of certain organisms. The foraging networks of ants provide
unrivalled opportunities to quantify both the behaviour of individual
items of traffic and larger-scale patterns of traffic flow. For
this reason they are ideal subjects to test mathematical models
that link the behaviour of small components (here, individual ants)
to the overall efficiency of the dynamic structures they generate
(see image from an individual-based simulation of trail formation,
left-bottom).
I have been studying the organisation of traffic
flow in army ant colonies (Eciton burchelli) in Panama
(top image). Colonies of this species stage huge swarm raids with
over 200, 000 foragers that transport more than 3, 000 prey items
an hour over raiding columns that can extend over 100 metres. Yet
individuals are small (mostly less than 1cm long) and almost completely
blind. Using image analysis to track the movement of ants on trails,
and individual-based computer models of pheromone trail-following
(osmotropotaxis), I am investigating how individual behaviours lead
to crucial properties including information on directionality, lane
formation and the minimisation of congestion.
Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society
of London, Series B. See the abstract.
Media reports and interviews
Editor's choice, "Avoiding Gridlock",
Science 299, 19
News focus, "Getting the behavior of social
insects to compute", Science 295,
2357 article.
"The ants go marching -- and manage to avoid
traffic jams", Princeton Weekly Bulletin article.
"Army ants march to military efficiency",
New Scientist.
"Army ants obey traffic plan to avoid jams",
National Geographic article.
"Ant traffic flow: raiding swarms with few
rules avoid gridlock", Science News article.
"Ants offer lessons in urban living",
The Guardian
"An urge to organise", The Philadelphia
Inquirer.
"Of ants and men: traffic flow", The
Today Programme, BBC Radio 4.
"Natural technology", Nature,
BBC Radio 4.
"Future watch: ant traffic", Radio South
Africa.
Other properties of social insect colonies I am
interested in are activity cycles exhibited by certain species.
Using Computer Vision approaches we
were able to reveal the spatial properties of these waves for the
first time, and developed coupled-oscillator models to explain the
regulation of such waves within colonies. See the abstract,
or download the paper (Proc.
R. Soc. Lond. B).
I am continuing investigations of ant colonies using Computer
Vision (see below). |
Collective
motion



|
Collaborators: Dr. Jens Krause and the fish research group, University
of Leeds. |
The integration of individual behaviours within
fish schools leads to a synchrony of motion that is captivating
(top image on the left). Similar patterns can be seen in bird flocks,
where the volume and shape of the group change as it arcs overhead,
yet the aggregate can remain cohesive (middle image).
I have been developing individual based models
of animal grouping in three-dimensional space (bottom image) to
investigate how individual behaviours result in collective patterns
(including loose 'swarms', collective directional motion and the
generation of a 'torus' formation where individuals perpetually
rotate around an empty core). This modelling has been useful in
revealing theoretical properties of animal groups, including "collective
memory", where the previous history of the group structure
influences the collective behaviour exhibited as individual interactions
change, even though individuals have no knowledge of what that history
is. I have also been exploring how behavioural differences among
individuals influence the internal structure of such groups, and
how individuals using simple, and local, rules can change their
spatial position within a group (e.g. to move to the centre, the
front, or the periphery) in the absence of their current position
within the group as a whole.
With Dr. Jens Krause and the fish behaviour research
group at the University of Leeds I am working on models to better
understand group choice behaviour in fish. We have also developed
new techniques to study spatial positions of individuals within
fish schools in the field as well as imaging techniques to automatically
track the motion, and record interactions among, individuals in
the laboratory (see Computer Vision,
below).
Current papers on
this topic include:
Effective leaderhsip and
decision making in animal groups on the move, Nature
Modelling density-dependent fish shoal distribution
in the laboratory and field, Oikos: see abstract.
Context-dependent group choice in fish, Animal
Behaviour: see abstract.
Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the
Trinidadian guppy, Oikos: see abstract.
Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates,
Advances in the Study of Behavior: see abstract.
When fish schools meet: outcomes for evolution
and fisheries, Fish and Fisheries: see abstract.
Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal
groups, Journal of Theoretical Biology: see abstract,
or download paper.
Effects of parasitism and body length of positioning
within wild fish schools, Journal of Animal Ecology: see
abstract, or download
paper.
A grid-net technique for the analysis of fish positions
in free-ranging fish schools, Journal of Fish Biology
Social organisation of fish schools, Advances
in Ethology.
Also see Information transfer
/ social learning below.
|
Tropical
cats / Automated telemetry


|
Collaborators:
Dr. Martin Wikelski (Princeton University), Dr. Roland Kays (New
York State Museum), William Cochran (Champaign, IL), Jamie Mandel
(STRI) and others. |
Starting in July 2002, I have been working on
the Automated Telemetry project on Barro Colorado Island (BCI),
in the Republic of Panama (a site of the Smithsonian Tropical Research
Institute, STRI). One of the main problems associated with studying
animal behaviour is accurately recording the motion of individuals,
interactions among individuals and interactions between individuals
and their environment. I have been working extensively on digital
computer imaging techniques to facilitate tracking of organisms
visually (see Computer vision, below).
However, some of the most difficult animals to study are those that
travel over large areas and/or move through complex habitats, where
computer vision techniques cannot be applied. Consequently there
is very little quantitative information about the movement patterns
and behaviours of large animals within the tropical rainforest.
The result of this dearth of information is that we have little
quantitative data with which to address some of the most fundamental
questions in biology, ecology and conservation, including: species
interactions and the evolution of diversity, competition, predation,
seed dispersal, the effects of habitat fragmentation and human disturbance.
In this pioneering project, we aim to set up an
automated telemetry system (ATS) that will facilitate the automatic
radio-tracking of tagged animals within a rainforest. Wireless communication
between 7 canopy towers (installed for this project), and the laboratory,
will mean that the positions of animals will be available digitally
in real-time, online, allowing registered users access to the trajectories
of individual animals on Barro Colorado Island wherever they are
in the world. I am also developing a 3-dimensional virtual landscape
of BCI to allow visualisation of our data, triangulation accuracy
studies and an environment for computer models of animal movement
in the rainforest (see image to the left, bottom).
One of the initial projects we have begun, to test
this system, is a study of tropical cats, including the ocelot (pictured
to the left, top). Further projects will involve large frugivorous
birds (such as toucans) and high-flying bats.
For more information on this project, and the latest
developments, visit "The Automated Telemetry Project"
website. |
Locust
swarms


|
Collaborators:
Prof. Steve Simpson, Prof. Phillip Maini, Dr. Dave Sumpter (University
of Oxford) |
"Understanding group formation and
the collective movement of locusts" (Funded by the EPSRC)
Despite the importance of understanding group dynamics
to ecological processes, many phenomena of collective behaviour
are still only qualitatively understood. Here we propose to address
this topic by using a combined empirical and mathematical modelling
approach to study the collective behaviour of the desert locust,
Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera, Acrididae). This is a particularly
good model organism for our study since much is already known about
the physiology and sensory system of this species, it is amenable
to experimental manipulation, and yet very little is known about
how such properties translate to the large-scale mobile groups of
this organism. The desert locust is notorious for forming large
swarms, and plagues of this species travelling across Africa and
Asia can cover over 20% of the land surface of the Earth, where
the impact on agriculture, and hence quality of human life, can
be devastating.
When they aggregate and gregarise, flightless juvenile
locust nymphs, known as “hoppers”, exhibit a distinctive
pattern of behaviour known as marching: they form large bands (as
opposed to adult flying ‘swarms’) that move between
food patches (see image to the left, top). A band is usually a broad
phalanx of individuals, and can vary in size from several thousand,
to hundreds of thousands of individuals, thus representing some
of the largest animal groups found in nature. The largest bands
may be tens of kilometres long, and yet they remain cohesive, travelling
up to 2km per day. As bands move they tend to merge with others.
Where conditions are sufficient for the persistence and growth of
bands, locusts are prone to swarm formation. In contrast, in environments
in which aggregations persist with less ease swarm formation is
inhibited. It is of great practical interest, therefore, to predict
the behaviour and movement of hopper bands in their natural environment.
A great deal is known about the behaviour and time-budgets of individual
locusts in the laboratory, but this does not explain the patterns
of activity observed in the field. In particular, gregarious locusts
on their own do not march but spend most of their time quiescent.
There exists a scattered and often anecdotal literature on the behaviour
of marching hopper bands, as well as some laboratory work. What
is required is an analytical treatment that has the power to explain
and predict the behaviour of hopper bands.
This study will investigate individual locusts’
response to conspecifics and to other external stimuli (such as
light, temperature and obstacles) in order to explain the generation
and movement of hopper bands. We will also quantify how such responses
are modulated by internal states variables, such as hunger and phase.
We will use novel digital imaging techniques to automatically track
the movement of locusts within relatively small groups in the laboratory
(see image to the left, bottom), as well as within subsections of
large groups in the field. The results from these experiments will
be used to parameterise new mathematical models of locust movement.
Mathematical models are a particularly important research tool in
the study of collective animal behaviour because individual interactions
are not reliably scaled up to population-level properties by verbal
arguments alone. Indeed, while the data collected through digital
imaging will be used to parameterise individual-based computer models
of swarm formation and movement, another aim of this project will
be to relate these individual-based models to mathematical models
of pattern formation, such as partial differential equations and
those found in statistical mechanics. We will build our understanding
by providing descriptions and explanations at a variety of temporal
and spatial scales. Integrating our understanding at these scales
will then allow us a more coherent view of the whole system. |
Information
transfer / social learning

|
Collaborators:
Prof. Simon Levin (Princeton University), Dr. Jens Krause (University
of Leeds) |
In the natural world animals that exhibit coordinated
behaviour patterns can gather and process data from many distinct
physical locations simultaneously. This decentralisation has important
implications for the acquisition and processing of information within
populations. A common problem that group-living animals are faced
with is that only one or a few individuals have access to information
about the location of a food source, a suitable nesting site or
a predator, whereas the majority of the group do not. Thus the survival
of the individual is often strongly dependent on the presence of
other group members. Recently, much interest has been focused on
the influence such ‘informed’ individuals have, and
it has been shown that initially naïve individuals can acquire
relevant information by interacting with knowledgeable individuals.
Such acquisition of information is termed “social learning”.
To understand better the processes, and consequences
of, social learning in animal groups I am developing computational
techniques to quantify 'social network structures' within real animal
groups (typically fish schools). Fish, in particular the guppy,
are a good study organism since it is known that individuals may
benefit from reciprocal altruism. Consequently an understanding
of the network structures will improve our understanding of the
evolution of cooperation in groups of unrelated (or largely unrelated)
individuals, as well as other important ecological properties such
as the spread of disease. This approach is being combined with fundamental
models of animal aggregation (see Fish Schooling,
above) in which patterns of clumping (social network formation)
emerge from individual behaviour, allowing us to develop new spatial
models of information/disease transmission grounded in empirical
research through collaboration with Dr. Jens Krause and his fish
research group at the University of Leeds, UK.
Current papers on
this topic include:
Effective leadership and decision making in animal
groups on the move, Nature
|
Computer
vision


|
With
commercial development through 'Eciton Software' |
The way in which we perceive phenomena has a
profound impact on our understanding of the world. Although humans
can easily derive and express information from a scene in symbolic
qualitative statements, we are subject to bias and inaccuracies
when quantifying visual information. Digital image processing and
analysis techniques, collectively termed ‘computer vision’,
provide an alternative means of interpreting images and extracting
information from them.
The study of animal behaviour often requires accurate
recording of the movement of individuals from which properties such
as the movement patterns, interactions among individuals and between
individuals and their environment must be determined. There are
many limitations to manual collection of data of this type. Humans
can seldom accurately quantify the successive spatial locations
of organisms necessary for behavioural analysis. It is also practically
impossible to perform continuous recording, thereby true frequencies,
and the times at which behaviour patterns stopped and started are
seldom available. When detailed information at the level of the
individual organism is needed, it is often impossible to observe
more than one individual at a time due to the restricted focal range
of the human visual system. The rate of movement, or behavioural
transitions, may also occur over temporal scales that are unsuitable
for human observation. I have developed digital imaging techniques
to automatically track and record the behaviour of many organisms
simultaneously (see Locust Swarms above,
and image from the tracking of ants in the laboratory, to the left,
bottom). Such technology is likely to yield novel and important
insights into individual behavioural patterns, and the use of computer
vision may benefit many areas of behavioural research.
Automated trajectory reconstruction and analysis
will allow a unique insight into the mechanisms of grouping behaviour,
and will provide essential data for the construction (and testing)
of realistic computer models. It is also likely to provide important
information to researchers interested in developing artificial visual
systems, and those interested in developing motion control algorithms
for autonomous mobile robots.
Through my computer vision company 'Eciton Software',
I develop novel imaging solutions for international clients (see
image to the left, top).
|
| Collective
robotics |
Collaborators:
Dr. Chris Melhuish (Intelligent Autonomous Systems Laboratory, University
of the West of England, UWE), Dr. Ana Sendova-Franks (UWE) |
I am currently an advisor on an EPSRC (The
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK) funded project
currently in progress at the 'Intelligent Autonomous Systems Laboratory'
in Bristol, UK (see website)
which is focussed on developing biologically-inspired control mechanisms
for mobile micro-robots. |
|