the books and hope for the best?
to do when your thesis adviser knows nothing about your topic
by Alex Rawson '01
I suppose it was inevitable.
But that doesn't mean I have to be happy about it.
Try though I have to
avoid using the dreaded "T" word in this space, I now
find myself resigned to writing a column about the progress of my
This strikes me as bizarre
if for no other reason than that you, dear reader, have in all likelihood
already written a thesis, and therefore probably care relatively
little about my own travails. The truth, though, is that as the
first semester begins to give way to the second, and as I realize
exactly how much work I have to do, I find myself increasingly thinking
about nothing else.
am a history major with an American Studies certificate, which means
that my independent work is disproportionately research-based. I
expect to spend the vast majority of my time simply poring through
primary sources. And this is where my problem comes in.
My thesis is on the memory
of Abraham Lincoln among African-Americans from 1865 to 1968, and
to write well on that topic requires as many primary sources as
possible - the more sources, the more accurate the portrayal of
trends in historical memory.
My thesis adviser, on
the other hand, because of unavoidable problems stemming from the
size of the history department, specializes in the history of science
and Tudor England, and as a consequence cannot help me find such
Not surprisingly, I have
had some trouble finding a full enough range of source material,
and that makes my research much more difficult. As much as I love
the history department (which is quite a lot), in a smaller department
I would almost certainly have had an adviser with significant knowledge
of my own focus. The history department claims nearly 150 members
of the class of 2001, making it by far the largest department this
The advantage of such
size is that I seldom have multiple precepts with the same students,
as I might in a smaller department, and that means that I get a
much broader range of views within departmental courses.
On the other hand, since
nearly two-thirds of history majors study American history while
only one-third of the history faculty teach it, it is very difficult
(as in my own case) to accurately match students with faculty for
This must be as frustrating
for faculty as it is for students - and there is certainly no simple
solution to the problem. That said, at the moment I am quite pleased
with my adviser - he has given me a number of crucial suggestions
about my research process and the analytic structure of my paper
(as well as less subtle advice such as his early December admonition,
"The job search is important, but it is time to make the thesis
a priority if you expect to do well." Oops. Point taken).
In any case, it may turn
out that because my adviser knows almost nothing about my topic
we can avoid getting bogged down in the details of my particular
reading of sources, focusing more productively on the broad issues
of whether or not my historical approach is valid.
meanwhile, the problem of finding sources is nonetheless difficult,
especially since other members of the history faculty, absorbed
with helping their own advisees, simply (and quite understandably)
have less time available to help someone like me identify potential
sources. The truth is that I am too inexperienced in genuine historical
research to really know where to look.
Thus, while I understand
that I may not be able to have a thesis adviser who specializes
in my area of interest, I wish there were a more established system
in place for helping students in my position find sources.
Such a system would be
a reasonably simple patch to the problems faced by large departments,
and would therefore be quite worthwhile. Maybe such a system already
exists, in which case it just needs a bit more publicity. In the
meantime, I had better get back to the library, because there are
an awful lot of books in there, and I have barely begun to look