 |
|
|
|
Berry Phase of Electrons in a Ring

Figure 1 (left) Conducting ring in
an applied magnetic field Bext and electric field
E. (right) Observed voltage between 1 and 2 versus external
field Bext. The beat pattern is direct evidence
for the Berry phase.
|
IRG 1: J.-B. Yau, E. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan
If we rotate an object (e.g. a bottle lying on its side)
once and return it exactly to its starting position, we
expect to recover the original state in principle. In the quantum-mechanical
realm, however, the wave function describing the object is altered
in a subtle way. Electrons, it seems, can never go home again after
a trip.
We may grab hold of an electron’s spin S
by applying a tilted magnetic field H (S
aligns with H). As we slowly precess H
so that it describes a cone, S follows suit and
returns to its initial direction. In 1984, Michael Berry showed
that the electron’s wave function, instead of recovering its
initial form, acquires a phase shift (the Berry phase). In recent
years, the existence of the Berry phase for photons has been demonstrated
in laser experiments. However, an explicit observation of the Berry
phase for electrons in solids is much more challenging.
Shayegan and students have recently achieved a particularly clean
demonstration of the Berry phase for electrons in the two-dimensional
gas trapped in a micron-sized conducting ring (left figure). Electrical
current is injected into the ring at an electrode 1 and extracted
at electrode 2. At 1, the electrons fork into two streams which
go around the ring and re-combine at 2. The wave functions of electrons
in the two streams interfere when they come together at 2. If the
interference happens to be constructive, the transmission probability
is enhanced, and the voltage measured between the electrodes is
low. Conversely, destructive interference produces a high voltage.
Previous experiments showed that a magnetic field Bext
applied parallel to z (normal to the plane of the
ring) engenders phase shifts of opposite signs in the two beams.
The phase shift is known as the Aharonov-Bohm or AB effect. If we
increase Bext, the AB phase shift grows in proportion,
periodically changing the interference at 2 from constructive to
destructive and back again. The observed voltage oscillates periodically
with Bext as a pure sine wave (rapid oscillation
in right figure).
To observe the Berry phase, Shayegan’s group applied a fixed
electric field E antiparallel to z, in addition
to Bext (see figure). In the rest frame of the moving
electrons, E appears as an effective magnetic field
Beff that is directed radially in the plane of the ring
(this is the origin of the spin-orbit coupling in an atom). The
combination of the original Bext and the new field Beff
produces a resultant field tilted at an angle q to z.
Moreover, as the electron moves around the ring, the tilted field
describes an inverted cone. As discussed above, the precession of
each spin around the cone forces the wave function to acquire a
Berry phase in addition to the original AB phase. The simultaneous
presence of the two phase shifts is analogous to combining two distinct
musical tones. Instead of a sine wave, the voltage acquires a beat
pattern versus Bext. Shayegan’s group measured
the beat pattern (right figure) and showed that it agrees qualitatively
with the prediction of Berry’s theorem.
Related publication:
J-B. Yau, E. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, “Aharonov-Bohm
Oscillations with Spin: Evidence for Berry’s Phase,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146801 (2002).
|
|