 |
Abstract: This paper analyzes the
historiographic dimension of the paired speeches of
Caesar and Cato at the climax of Sallust’s
Bellum Catilinae. Where Caesar stresses the
continuities between past and present and so the
capacity of history, rationally analyzed, to offer
general precepts for political behavior, Cato by
contrast stresses the radical difference of the past.
Each perspective allows a different reading of
Sallust’s own narrative. Yet rather than
privileging one point of view over the other, Sallust
uses the tension between them to focus attention on the
question of what history is for in an age of civil
discord. |