| 021002 |
'Epideixis' versus elenchus: The epirrhematic
agon and the politics of Aristophanes’ 'Frogs' |
|
Foivos Karachalios, Stanford University |
 |
Abstract - This paper proposes a particular
interpretation of the epirrhematic agon between
Euripides and Aeschylus in Aristophanes’ Frogs, namely
that Euripides’ epirrheme constitutes a rhetorical
display (epideixis), whereas Aeschylus’ involves
a question-and-answer approach with elements that
resemble the Socratic elenchus. This interpretation is
then employed toward a broader understanding of the
politics of this play, including the final judgment of
Dionysus. I argue that Euripides is consistently
depicted as a disruptive force in the life of the
community in both cultural and political terms, so that
his eventual rejection signifies concern for communal
cohesion in a time of crisis for Athens. |
|
|
| 090907 |
Mythical inversions and history in Bacchylides
5 |
|
Foivos Karachalios, Stanford University |
 |
Abstract - The purpose of this paper is
first to suggest that the mythical section of
Bacchylides 5 is governed by a certain literary
strategy, namely the inversion of social and literary
norms pertaining to gender as well as the heroic ideal.
Second, by looking at the historical context of the ode
I venture to demonstrate that, as presented in the
mythical section, the key inversion of external into
internal war might have had a concrete meaning for the
laudandus, Hieron of Syracuse. |
|
|