 |
Abstract: Phaedrus wrote two fables
featuring Roman emperors. In Fable 2.5 we find Emperor
Tiberius giving a busybody his deserved come-uppance,
and in Fable 3.10 Augustus miraculously solves a
murder-suicide case. Yet couched among so many of
Phaedrus’ fables that criticize authority
figures, these positive portrayals of the emperors come
as a surprise to the reader and present a significant
problem of interpretation. In exploring the different
possible readings of the two poems, this paper follows
Phaedrus through a complex interpretive maze and shows
how the fabulist’s own self-portrayal intersects
with and colors his portrayal of the first two Roman
emperors. |