| 060801 |
Etymology (A Linguistic Window onto the History
of Ideas) |
|
Joshua Katz, Princeton University |
 |
Abstract - This short essay for a volume on
the classical tradition aims to give a basic, lively
account of the forms and development of etymological
practice from antiquity to the present day. |
|
|
| 070702 |
The Origin of the Greek Pluperfect |
|
Joshua Katz, Princeton University |
 |
Abstract - The origin of the pluperfect is
the biggest remaining hole in our understanding of the
Ancient Greek verbal system. This paper provides a
novel unitary account of all four morphological types
— alphathematic, athematic, thematic, and the
anomalous Homeric form 3sg.
ēídē ‘knew’
— beginning with a “Jasanoff-type”
reconstruction in Proto-Indo-European, an
“imperfect of the perfect.” |
|
This paper has now been published in Die
Sprache 46 (2006, publ. 2008), pp. 1-37. |
|
|
| 070701 |
The Epic Adventures of an Unknown
Particle |
|
Joshua Katz, Princeton University |
 |
Abstract - This paper, a mini-"Autour
de ‘ταρ
épique’," is above all a
contribution to the study of Homeric formulas and
compositional technique. I give an overview and expand
our understanding of the under-appreciated Homeric
particle tar, whose Cuneiform Luvian cognate
Calvert Watkins discovered over a decade ago and whose
essential Greek-ness M. L. West accepts in his Teubner
edition of the Iliad; demonstrate on linguistic
and stylistic grounds that tar is part of the
conjunction autár but not of the
semantically similar near-look-alike atár;
and explain why this unstressed and almost unknown
monosyllable is of unexpectedly wide interest, being
not just a bit of Homeric and Indo-European linguistic
trivia, but an important rhetorical device in the
description of ancient Greek ritual. |
|
This paper has been published in Greek and Latin
from an Indo-European Perspective, ed. Coulter
George, Matthew McCullaugh, Benedicte Nielsen, Antonia
Ruppel, & Olga Tribulato (Cambridge, Cambridge
Philological Society, 2007), pp. 65-79. |
|
|
| 120505 |
The Riddle of the 'sp(h)ij-': The Greek Sphinx
and her Indic and Indo-European Background |
|
Joshua Katz, Princeton University |
 |
Abstract - The name of the Sphinx,
the Greek female monster who had fun killing passers-by
who could not answer her riddle, has long been an
etymological conundrum. On the basis of literary,
linguistic, and anthropological evidence from, above
all, Greece and India, this paper comes to a novel
understanding of the Sphinx’ origin, concluding
that her oldest moniker, (S)Phí:k-, is related
to a newly uncovered Greek noun phíkis
‘buttocks’ and to a Sanskrit word for the
same body part, sphij-, a hitherto misunderstood
form of which appears, in turn, in a riddle in the
oldest Indic text, the Rigveda. This derivation
situates the Greek creature squarely in the
cross-culturally typically aggressive and sexually
charged genre of riddling. |
|
This paper is now published in La Langue
poétique indo-européenne: actes du Colloque de travail
de la Société des Études Indo-Européennes
(Indogermanische Gesellschaft / Society for
Indo-European Studies), Paris, 22-24 octobre 2003,
ed. Georges-Jean Pinault & Daniel Petit
(Leuven—Paris: Peeters, 2006), pp. 157-94. |
|
|
| 120504 |
What Linguists are Good for |
|
Joshua Katz, Princeton University |
 |
Abstract - Linguists are good for a lot.
This is a personal account of why departments of
Classics should embrace them (us). |
|
This has been published in Classical World
100 (2007), pp. 99-112. |
|
|
| 120503 |
Review of Joachim Latacz’s 'Troy and
Homer: Towards a Solution of an Old Mystery' |
|
Joshua Katz, Princeton University |
 |
Abstract - In this book, a translation of a
German bestseller, the most vigorous proponent of the
view that the Iliad is a reliable source of
information about the city of Troy in the Late Bronze
Age, presents the evidence from two very different
fields: archaeology and linguistics/philology. Though
especially sympathetic to the idea that certain
significant details in Homer reflect society as it was
long before the eighth century B.C., in a shared
Greco-Anatolian setting, this reviewer, a
linguist/philologist, is nevertheless dismayed by
Latacz’s presentation of the evidence. To take
just one egregious example of bias disguised as
fact—a “fact” that certain colleagues
are unfortunately already citing as gospel—there
is, pace Latacz and Frank Starke, no
evidence for the claim that an actual Hittite
document reveals as a forebear of the king of Ahhiyawa
(~ Achaia) a man by the name of Kadmos. |
|
This has been published in Journal of the
American Oriental Society 125 (2005), pp.
422-25. |
|
|