|
|

Europe and the Management of
Globalization
Princeton University
February 23, 2007
A
workshop organized by
Sophie Meunier and
Wade Jacoby
Sponsored by the
Brigham Young
Center for the Study of Europe, the
Council for
European Studies, the
Princeton
Center for Globalization and Governance, and the
EU Program at
Princeton
Conference Administrator:
Nancy Barthelemy
Globalization – loosely defined as the
increased flows of goods, services, capital, people, and information
across borders – has been the source of many worries in Europe. In several
countries, especially those in “old Europe,” globalization is more often
perceived as a threat than as an opportunity. Some see a threat to their
jobs, others to their social welfare, and yet others to their way of life.
The European Union (EU) often has been vilified as a Trojan Horse that
helps bring globalization into the heart of Europe. However, others have
heralded the EU as Europe’s best defense against the negative effects of
globalization. Over the past decade, European voters and politicians have
increasingly demanded that the EU “manage” globalization instead of just
passively receiving it.
Characterizing the EU as a system of management is nothing new. Original
practical aspirations for European integration have often emphasized the
management of intra-European foreign policy tensions. Conceptually,
European integration has been seen as an effort to manage the eroding
powers of national states, to manage the creation of an integrated market,
and to manage the “pooling” of national sovereignty. But what all of these
different “management” approaches have in common is a focus on tensions
and challenges with an intra-European origin. More recently, the concept
of “managed globalization,” articulated explicitly as the central doctrine
of EU trade policy since 1999, suggests that order and control should be
restored to the process of globalization by framing it with rules, obeying
these rules, and empowering international organizations to make and
implement these rules. The EU is particularly well placed to provide the
institutional foundations for this management of globalization, since
economic liberalization has been such a fundamental part of the experience
of European integration.
This workshop will explore how over the past fifteen years European
policy-makers have tried to manage globalization, both inside and outside
Europe, in a variety of policy areas. We argue that this concept of
managed globalization, originally and explicitly developed with respect to
trade and finance, has become the underlying driver of almost all the
major policy initiatives undertaken by the EU in the past decade. Whether
the euro, immigration, or the constitutional treaty, all these policies
have been designed, at least in part, to restore order and control in the
face of challenges posed by globalization. While most of these policies
operate inside EU borders, some go well beyond them or indeed have
expanded those borders. In this sense, enlargement has been the management
tool par excellence, a mechanism both for socializing Central Europe, the
Baltics, and the part of the Balkans into the EU sphere but also for
stabilizing a zone of lower wages, lower tax rates, and lower levels of
market regulation. Moreover, the enlargement mechanisms have had a
powerfully path-dependent effect on the EU’s Neighborhood Policy towards
states that, while not candidates for membership, are certainly candidates
for EU efforts at socialization and institutional reform.
Through analytical memos written in advance of the meeting and the
discussion during the day, the workshop participants will analyze how
“managed globalization” has become a central component – sometimes
explicitly and other times implicitly – of the EU’s major policy
initiatives in recent years.
Workshop
Program
February
23, 2007
Corwin
Hall 127
9:00-10:30
Discussed by
Alberta Sbragia
Discussed by
Andrew
Moravcsik
Discussed by
Christina
Davis
10:30-10:45: Break
10:45-12:15
Discussed by
Carles Boix
Discussed by
Sheri Berman
12:15-1:30: Lunch
1:30-3:00
Discussed by
Phil Cerny
Discussed by
Randall
Stone
3:00-3:15: Break
3:15-5:00
Discussed by
Daniel Kelemen
Ryan D. Griffiths rapporteur
|