| |
APPROACH: Interdisciplinary teaching |
| |
Site seminars
utilizing a
multidisciplinary approach have proven very effective in
training graduate students and developing new fields. Extended
residence for two to four weeks, combined with lectures by
experts in the field, allow the intensive study of a specific
temple, a complex of excavations, or a regional artistic style.
Examples of recent seminars include the
Silkroad Foundation’s
seminar on Dunhuang Art and Society, administered by NING Qiang
(Connecticut College), Walter Spink’s (University of Michigan)
seminar at Ajanta (Maharashtra, India), and the Luce-funded
seminar at Kizil (Xinjiang Autonomous Region, China), organized
by Angela Howard (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey).
In addition to teaching about the specific locale, site seminars
introduce the methodologies of archaeology, art history,
architecture, social history, and religious studies, and they
allow students and faculty to learn from the leading authorities
in the field.
In Art History
art is the
primary subject in itself, even as visual images and artifacts
are increasingly being used to illustrate ideas at the heart of
other disciplines. In the study of Tibetan art, access to mobile
art (tangkas and small sculptures) in museums and private
collections in the West is growing substantially, but the
primary reliable benchmarks for dating and stylistic development
remain the sculptures, paintings, temples, and other monuments
still preserved in situ in central and western Tibet. The
importance of firsthand study of these primary source materials
cannot be overstressed, and the fact that Tibetan art history is
underdeveloped within Art History departments in American
universities can be tied at least in part to Tibet’s
geographical and political isolation from the previous
generation of scholars. This site seminar will help add
momentum to and build a stronger foundation for doctoral
programs in Tibetan art in the U.S., which are still in a
fledgling state.
Buddhist Studies
as a field of
study was
founded on comparative philology and the study of texts in the
nineteenth century, but more recently it has moved toward a more
interdisciplinary model. Scholars trained in the study of
scripture are increasingly learning about art, while art
historians are expanding their already strong interest in
cultural studies. Furthermore, the compartmentalization of
Buddhist studies into “Indo-Tibetan” and “Sino-Japanese” halves
is beginning to break down, driven by the discovery of the many
historical movements and figures that cross these traditional
but largely artificial divides. There are now several new
examples of successful, long-term scholarly collaboration
between art historians and religion scholars, including the
Austrian-funded team at Tabo (culturally western Tibet but now
Himachel Pradesh, India), engaging Deborah Klimburg-Salter and
Christian Luczanits as art historians, and Paul Harrison,
Cristina Scherrer-Schaub, and Ernst Steinkellner as
Buddhologists. |
| |
|
|