Tas is the transcriptional trans-activator of foamy retroviruses. It activates gene expression from both the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter and an internal promoter that drives the expression of Tas itself. Understanding the mechanism of transcriptional activation and temporal control of retroviral gene expression by Tas is the key to understand the mechanism of foamy viruses replication. In this study I intend to investigate the following aspects of transcriptional activation by Tas:
1. Accurate mapping of binding sites for Tas in foamy virus genomes,
particularly in the LTR and in the internal promoter.
2. DNA sequence specificity of human and simian foamy virus
transcriptional activator Tas.
3. Identification of the cellular cofactor for Tas transcriptional
activation.
B. Introduction
Foamy viruses, including human foamy virus (HFV) and the simian foamy
viruses (SFVs), are unusual among retroviruses in that they contain two
distinct promoter elements (Rethwilm, 1995, see the attached figure). As
in all retroviruses, a promoter element located in the viral long terminal
repeat (LTR) directs the synthesis of a genome-length transcript that
gives rise to the viral structural proteins Gag, Pol, and Env. The second
foamy virus promoter, termed the internal promoter (IP), is located at the
3' end of the envelope gene (Campbell et al., 1996; Lochelt et al., 1993,
Mergia, 1994). The IP is primarily responsible for the expression of two
open reading frames located between env and the 3' LTR, one of which
encodes a transcriptional transactivator termed Tas (also known as Bel-1
in HFV). Importantly, both of these promoter elements are strongly
activated upon expression of the cognate Tas/Bel-1 regulatory protein
(Rethwilm, 1995). The internal promoter element is thought to activate
expression of these auxiliary proteins early in viral life cycle and is
clearly critical for effective virus replication in culture. (Lochelt et al.,
1994)
Analysis of the mechanism of action of Bel-1 in HFV and of Tas in SFV-1
has demonstrated that these virally encoded transcription factors are DNA
binding proteins, a property which distinguishes Tas/Bel-1 from the
functionally equivalent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat and
human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax proteins (He et al., 1996; Zou et a;.
1996; Cullen, 1992). Domain organization analysis of the HFV Bel-1
protein has identified an acidic transcription activation domain located
within the carboxy-terminal ~40 amino acids (aa) of this 300-aa viral
regulatory protein and has also defined a DNA targeting domain occupying
~120 aa in the core of Bel-1 (Blair et al., 1994; Garrett et al., 1993; He et
al., 1993,Venkatesh et al., 1993). While the domain organization of the
related SFV type 1 (SFV-1) Tas protein appears to be very similar to that
observed in Bel-1 (Mergia et al., 1993), Tas and Bel-1 both fail to activate
transcription directed by promoters containing functional DNA target
sites specific for the other protein (Garrett et al., 1993).
Although several DNA target sites for Bel-1 have been mutationally
defined, these have little evident sequence homology (Erlwein et al., 1993;
Keller et al., 1992, Keller et al., 1991; Lee et al., 1993, Lochelt et al.,
1993, Venkatesh et al., 1991). Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that
Bel-1 can directly and specifically bind to the major, cap-proximal Bel-1
response element (BRE) located in the viral LTR promoter and also to
sequences present in the HFV internal promoter element (He et al., 1996).
Similarly, specific Tas binding to the SFV-1 internal promoter, and to a
proposed Tas-dependent enhancer element located in the SFV-1 gag gene,
has also been reported (Campbell et al., 1996, Zou et al., 1996).
Surprisingly, for both Tas and Bel-1, DNA sequences that are sufficient
for DNA binding in vitro were found to be necessary but not sufficient for
optimal Tas or Bel-1 function in vivo (He et al., 1996, Zou, et al., 1996).
This observation raises the possibility that other, cellular DNA binding
proteins may play a critical role in mediating Bel 1 and Tas function in
vivo. There has been speculations that Tas/Bel-1 plays an important role
in the temporal control of foamy virus early and late gene expression
(Lochelt et al., 1993). However, the mechanism by which Tas exerts this
control has remained unclear.
C. Experimental Design and Methods
Aim 1. Although target sequences for the Bel-1 protein have been loosely
defined both based on functional criteria and by in vitro DNA binding
(Erlwein et al., 1993; Keller et al., 1992, Keller et al., 1991; Lee et al.,
1993, Lochelt et al., 1993, Venlatesh et al., 1991), the actual DNA target
specificity of Bel-1 remains far from clear. I had demonstrated that Bel-1
binds to the BRE present in the internal promoter with significantly higher
affinity than to the major LTR promoter BRE in both in vivo and in vitro
assay systems. This difference in affinity may, at least in part, explain
the observation that the HFV IP is activated significantly earlier than the
LTR promoter during the foamy virus life cycle (Lochelt et al., 1994). This
difference in affinity, if functionally important, could also explain the
limited homology between the HFV LTR and IP Bel-1 binding site. Using
modification interference, I had identified individual bases within both
the internal and LTR promoters that are critical for Bel-1 DNA binding in
vitro. Subsequently a minimal, 25-bp DNA sequence derived from Bel-1
bind site at IP was shown to be sufficient to mediate Bel-1 binding both
in vitro and in vivo. This work has been published in the Journal of
Virology (Kang et al., 1998a).
There are at least three BREs in the HFV LTR and preliminary data
demonstrate that there are at least two more Bel-1 binding sites in the
LTR in addition to the site in the cap-proximal BRE. I will combine in vitro
footprinting assay and in vivo DNA binding assay in yeast and mammalian
cells to precisely map these additional Bel-1 binding sites in the LTR. All
these Bel-1 binding site will then be individually and combinatorially
mutated or changed to higher affinity binding sequence for Bel-1, and the
effects of such changes on the response of LTR promoter to Bel-1 will be
examined. Results obtained from these experiments will facilitate
understanding of the temporal regulation of viral gene expression by
Bel-1.
Aim 2. There is very little homology between the HFV LTR and IP Bel-1
binding sites (He et al., 1996). Similarly, the SFV-1 IP and gag gene Tas
binding sites also display only limited homology to each other and to
Tas-responsive DNA sequences present in the SFV-1 LTR (Campbell et al.,
1996; Mergia et al., 1992; Zou et al., 1996). These findings, combined with
the observation that Bel-1 and Tas are specific only for target sequences
present in their cognate viral genome (Campbell et al., 1994; Keller et al.,
1991), have meant that no consensus DNA binding site for either Bel-1 or
Tas has been defined. The sequence specificity of Tas/Bel-1 therefore is
poorly understood.
The initial attempt to use PCR-based in vitro randomization/selection
(Wright et al., 1991) to derive a consensus binding sequence for Tas/Bel-1
was not successful. Therefore I designed a novel in vivo
randomization/selection procedure to define a consensus DNA binding site
for the SFV-1 Tas protein. A minimal 25 bp SFV-1 IP that binds strongly
to Tas was divided into five 5-bp segments and individually randomized
and cloned into the promoter region of the yeast lacZ reporter. Tas
responsive sequences were selected by virtue of their ability to drive the
LacZ expression in response to Tas. Compilation of favored nucleotide
sequence at each position of the minimal SFV IP results in a consensus
Tas binding site. I demonstrate that the most-favored DNA sequence binds
Tas with a higher affinity than does the wild-type IP Tas binding site both
in vivo and in vitro. In addition, I have constructed a highly variant Tas
DNA binding site that, while identical to the minimal IP Tas binding site
at only 8 of 25 positions, can nevertheless binds to Tas effectively both in
vivo and in vitro. The flexibility of the DNA binding specificity of Tas
appears to explain the marked variability in the sequence of Tas
responsive sequences previously identified in the SFV-1 genome. This
work has also been published in the Journal of Virology (Kang et al.,
1998b).
I plan to apply the same technique to derive a consensus binding sequence
for HFV Bel-1. Comparison of the consensus binding sequences of SFV-1
Tas and HFV Bel-1 will answer the question of why these two viral
proteins can not cross-transactivate each other's cognate target.
Aim 3. Several lines of evidence suggests that cellular factors play a
role in the transcriptional regulation by Bel-1/Tas. Mutation of sequences
outside the Bel-1 binding site in the cap proximal BRE in HFV LTR severely
reduce the transactivation response to Bel-1(He et al., 1996); the distal
element in SFV-1 IP is able to recruit Tas to the promoter independent of
the actual Tas binding site in the SFV-1 IP (Zou et al., 1996). Presumably
these functionally important non-Bel 1/Tas binding sites are recognized
by cellular transcription factors which might also interact with
Tas/Bel-1 to regulate the viral promoter. The yeast one-hybrid system
will be utilized to search for cellular proteins that interact with these
DNA sequences. Once candidate proteins are identified further in vitro and
in vivo protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction assays will be applied
to address the functional importance of these cellular cofactor in the
regulation of foamy virus gene expression.
Reference
Baunach, G., B. Maurer, H. Hahn, M. Kranz, and A. Rethwilm. 1993. Functional
analysis of human foamy virus accessory reading frames. J. Virol.
67:5411-5418.
Blair, W. S., H. Bogerd, and B. R. Cullen. 1994. Genetic analysis indicates
that the human foamy virus Bel-1 protein contains a transcription
activation domain of the acidic class. J. Virol. 68:3803-3808.
Campbell, M., C. Eng, and P. A. Luciw. 1996. The simian foamy virus type 1
transcriptional transactivator (Tas) binds and activates an enhancer
element in the gag gene. J. Virol. 70:6847 6855.
Campbell, M., L. Renshaw-Gegg, R. Renne, and P. A. Luciw. 1994.
Characterization of the internal promoter of simian foamy viruses. J.
Virol. 68:4811-4820.
Cullen, B. R. 1992. Mechanism of action of regulatory proteins encoded by
complex retroviruses. Microbiol. Rev. 56:375-394.
Erlwein, O., and A. Rethwilm. 1993. Bel-1 transactivator responsive
sequences in the long terminal repeat of human foamy virus. Virology
196:256-268.
Flügel, R. M. 1991. Spumaviruses: a group of complex retroviruses. J.
Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. 4:739-750.
Garrett, E. D., F. He, H. P. Bogerd, and B. R. Cullen. 1993. Transcriptional
trans activators of human and simian foamy viruses contain a small,
highly conserved activation domain. J. Virol. 67:6824-6827.
He, F., W. S. Blair, J. Fukushima, and B. R. Cullen. 1996. The human foamy
virus Bel-1 transcription factor is a sequence-specific DNA binding
protein. J. Virol. 70:3902-3908.
He, F., J. D. Sun, E. D. Garrett, and B. R. Cullen. 1993. Functional
organization of the Bel-1 trans activator of human foamy virus. J.Virol.
67:1896-1904.
Kang, Y., W. S. Blair, and B. R. Cullen. 1998a. Identification and functional
characterization of a high-affinity Bel-1 DNA binding site located in
the human foamy virus internal promoter. J. Virol. 72:504-511.
Kang, Y. and B. R. Cullen. 1998b. Derivation and Functional Characterization
of the Consensus DNA Binding sequence for the Tas Transcriptional
Activator of Simian Foamy Virus Type 1. J. Virol. 72: 5502-5509.
Keller, A., K. M. Partin, M. Löchelt, H. Bannert, R. M. Flügel, and B. R. Cullen.
1991. Characterization of the transcriptional trans activator of human
foamy retrovirus. J. Virol. 65:2589-2594.
Lee, K. J., A. H. Lee, and Y. C. Sung. 1993. Multiple positive and negative
cis-acting elements that mediate transactivation by bel1 in the long
terminal repeat of human foamy virus. J. Virol. 67:2317-2326.
Löchelt, M., R. M. Flügel, and M. Aboud. 1994. The human foamy virus
internal promoter directs the expression of the functional Bel-1
transactivator and Bet protein early after infection. J. Virol.
68:638-645.
Löchelt, M., W. Muranyi, and R. M. Flügel. 1993. Human foamy virus genome
possesses an internal, Bel-1-dependent and functional promoter. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7317-7321.
Löchelt, M., S. F. Yu, M. L. Linial, and R. M. Flügel. 1995. The human foamy
virus internal promoter is required for efficient gene expression and
infectivity. Virology 206:601-610.
Löchelt, M., H. Zentgraf, and R. M. Flügel. 1991. Construction of an
infectious DNA clone of the full-length human spumaretrovirus genome
and mutagenesis of the bel 1 gene. Virology 184:43-54.
Mergia, A. 1994. Simian foamy virus type 1 contains a second promoter
located at the 3' end of the env gene. Virology 199:219-222.
Mergia, A., E. Pratt-Lowe, K. E. S. Shaw, L. W. Renshaw-Gegg, and P. A.
Luciw. 1992. cis acting regulatory regions in the long terminal repeat
of simian foamy virus type 1. J. Virol. 66:251-257.
Mergia, A., K. E. S. Shaw, E. Pratt-Lowe, P. A. Barry, and P. A. Luciw. 1991.
Identification of the simian foamy virus transcriptional transactivator
gene (taf). J. Virol. 65:2903-2909.
Rethwilm, A. 1995. Regulation of foamy virus gene expression. Curr. Top.
Microbiol. Immunol. 193:1-24.
Rethwilm, A., O. Erlwein, G. Baunach, B. Maurer, and V. Ter Meulen. 1991.
The transcriptional transactivator of human foamy virus maps to the
bel 1 genomic region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:941-945.
Venkatesh, L. K., P. A. Theodorakis, and G. Chinnadurai. 1991. Distinct
cis-acting regions in U3 regulate trans-activation of the human
spumaretrovirus long terminal repeat by the viral bel1 gene product.
Nucleic Acids Res. 19:3661-3666.
Wright, W. E., M. Binder, and W. Funk. 1991. Cyclic amplification and
selection of targets (CASTing) for the myogenin consensus binding site.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4104-4110.
Zou, J. X., and P. A. Luciw. 1996. The transcriptional transactivator of
simian foamy virus 1 binds to a DNA target element in the viral
internal promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:326-330.
Part II: Cellular cofactor for CTE-dependent nuclear export of
type D retroviral RNA.
A. Specific Aims:
The constitutive transport element (CTE) of the type D retroviruses promotes nuclear export of unspliced viral RNAs by recruiting host factor(s) required for export of cellular messenger RNAs. Recently, the human Tap protein was shown to specifically bind to the CTE in vitro, and stimulate CTE-dependent mRNA export in Xenopus oocytes. Mex67p, the yeast homolog of Tap, is also involved in the nuclear export of yeast cellular mRNAs. Here, I propose to study the following aspects of Tap:
1. Functional dissection of human Tap protein.
2. Nuclear import/export receptor and functional partners of Tap.
3. The cellular role of Tap.
B. Introduction:
Most pre-mRNAs are completely spliced and polyadenylated prior to their
export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (reviewed by Nakielny and
Dreyfuss, 1997) while unspliced pre mRNAs are retained in the nucleus.
Nevertheless, replication of retroviruses requires export of unspliced
viral RNAs, both as templates for the synthesis of structural proteins and
as genomic RNA to be packaged in progeny virions. All retroviruses have
therefore evolved some mechanism to bypass the requirement for splicing
prior to export. Many complex retroviruses, like the human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), encode trans-acting factors that
facilitate export of unspliced and incompletely spliced RNAs. The Rev
protein of HIV-1 binds an intronic sequence in HIV-1 RNA, the Rev
response element (RRE), and promotes export of the intron containing
HIV-1 RNAs (Malim et al., 1989a, b). This export requires a leucine-rich
nuclear export signal (NES) in the Rev protein (Meyer and Malim, 1994, Wen
et al., 1995). Cellular nuclear export receptor CRM1 then recognizes the
leucine-rich NES and promotes export of the RNP complex. As simpler
retroviruses do not encode trans-acting regulatory proteins, export of
their unspliced RNA must therefore rely on the interaction of cis-acting
RNA elements with cellular factors.. A cis-acting RNA element located
near the 3' end of one such retrovirus, Mason Pfizer monkey virus (MPMV),
has been shown to be important for export of the intron containing viral
RNA (Bray et al., 1994; Ernst et al., 1997a). Both the sequence and function
of this element, termed the constitutive transport element (CTE), are
conserved in related type D retroviruses (Zolotukhin et al., 1994;
Tabernero et al., 1996; Ernst et al., 1997b). Because the CTE can
substitute for RRE/Rev in promoting export of intron-containing RNAs
(Bray et al., 1994; Tabernero et al., 1996; Ernst et al., 1997a), it is likely
that the CTE functions by interacting with cellular export factors.
However, although Rev uses the same export pathway as snRNAs and 5S
ribosomal RNA, the CTE export pathway shares cellular factors that are
essential for cellular mRNA export. (Saavedra et al., 1997; Pasquinelli et
al., 1997).
The CTE folds into an extended RNA stem-lop structure (see the attached
figure), comprising two conserved internal loops, A and B, which are
believed to represent the interaction sites for cellular CTE-binding
proteins. Their 180 degree symmetric arrangement indicates duplication
of the binding site. Recently, Gruter, et al, identified Tap (Yoon et al,
1997), the human homolog of yeast mRNA export factor Mex67p (Segref et
al, 1997), as the CTE-binding protein. Tap binds specifically to wild-type
but not mutant CTE RNA in vitro and stimulate CTE-dependent RNA export
in Xenopus oocytes. In addition, Tap overcomes the mRNA export block
caused by the presence of saturating amounts of CTE RNA. Therefore Tap is
a strong candidate as the bona fide cellular cofactor for the
CTE-dependent RNA export. However, the binding to Tap to CTE has not yet
been demonstrated in vivo, and the domain organization and mechanism of
Tap function are still poorly understood. Furthermore, the cellular role of
Tap remains unknown. Several sets of experiments discussed below are
designed to answer these questions.
C. Experimental Design and Methods
Aim 1. Yeast three-hybrid system and a Tat-based mammalian RNA
binding assay system were applied to analyze CTE binding to Tap in vivo.
Microinjection experiments using GST fusion proteins of full length and
various truncated forms of Tap were performed to map the NLS and NES in
Tap. Further in vitro and in vivo experiments will address the functional
importance of Tap in CTE-dependent nuclear export of mRNA.
a. Tap binds specifically to CTE in vivo, and aa 20-312 is the
minimal RNA binding domain. In the yeast-three hybrid assay, binding
of Tap-VP16 fusion protein to MS2-CTE chimeric RNA recruits the VP16
activation domain to the promoter of a LacZ reporter gene and
subsequently activates its transcription. Tap specifically binds to
wild-type CTE, half CTE and the terminal loop mutant of CTE. Mutation in
either internal loop A or B reduces the affinity of CTE for Tap, while a
double mutation in loop A and B completely knocked out Tap binding.
Deletion mutant 1-312 surprisingly has a much higher affinity for CTE
than the full length protein. Tap (20-312) still processes the ability to
bind specifically to CTE while mutants 42 312 and 1-298 do not.
Therefore the RNA binding domain is mapped to aa 20-312 in Tap.
A similar study was carried out in the mammalian RNA binding assay
system. Tat-Tap fusion proteins recognize the CTE RNA inserted in the
place of TAR in HIV-LTR promoter, which drives the expression of the CAT
reporter gene. The binding specificity data obtained from the mammalian
assay system is consistent with the data collected in the yeast
three-hybrid system. Eight alanine scanning mutants made in the region of
42-312 all knocked out the ability of Tat Tap(1-312) to bind to CTE,
suggesting that this region indeed is critical for RNA binding. Importantly
in contrast to published results that both loop A and B must be intact for
CTE function in mammalian cells (Tabernero et al., 1996), Tap clearly is
able to binds to either half of the CTE in mammalian cells in our assay
system. Therefore, just as the case with Rev, multimerization of Tap on
RNA may be necessary for its function in export even though it's not
indispensable for RNA binding.
b. Mapping of NLS and NES in Tap.
Hela cell microinjection experiments indicate that there are two nuclear
localization signals in Tap, one at each ends of the protein. However,
neither of these has any obvious similarity to currently known nuclear
localization signals. The N-terminal NLS is composed of the first 42
amino acids of Tap. Mutations in aa 9-11, aa 20-22 and aa 28-30 knocked
out this NLS. The C terminal NLS of Tap (aa 480-559) also functions as a
potent nuclear export signal. Surprisingly full length Tap does not seem to
have NES activity in our assay. One possible explanation is binding of CTE
to Tap changes its conformation and exposes the NES, which then enables
the loaded Tap to export out of the nucleus. Further experiments such as
co-microinjection of Tap and CTE RNA are needed to address this
possibility.
c. In vivo randomization/selection of functional CTE variants.
To functionally correlate the binding of Tap to CTE and the enhancement of
CTE-dependent RNA export, we design an in vivo randomization/selection
strategy to select CTE RNA sequence variants that can still be recognized
by Tap, and subsequently tested the ability of these variants to support
CTE-dependent nuclear export of intron-containing mRNA. Seven
nucleotides at internal loop B of a half CTE construct in the yeast
three-hybrid system were randomized and selected for Tap binding by in
situ b-gal assay of the transformed yeast colonies. I was able to select
the wild-type CTE as well as four sequence variants from the library. All
these variants have lower affinity for Tap compared to wild-type CTE
sequences but nevertheless are able to at least partially substitute for
wild-type CTE in the nuclear export of mRNA in the intron-CAT reporter
assay. I am currently making Rev- RRE- HIV-1 construct and will test the
ability of wild-type and the variant CTE sequences to support the
expression of HIV-1 Gag proteins.
d. Functional analysis of Tap mediated export in mammalian
cells. Even though enhancement of CTE-dependent RNA export by Tap has
been demonstrated in Xenopus oocytes (Gruter et al., 1998), a similar
experiment has not been done in mammalian cells. Initially I tried to
enhance CTE -dependent nuclear export of intron containing mRNA by
overexpressing Tap. However, the experiment did not succeed, possibly
because Tap protein is already expressed at a saturating level in the cell.
Overexpression of CTE RNA also failed to drive the cellular Tap to a
limiting level. In addition, none of the deletion mutants of Tap were able
to function as a strong dominant negative suppressor for CTE function
even though Tap (20-312), which retained the RNA binding ability but lost
all NLS and NES signals, seems to be able to weakly suppress CTE function
when it's targeted into nucleus by fusing to Tat. In an alternative approach
to directly demonstrate the involvement of Tap in the nuclear export of
mRNA, I plan to co-tranfect sense or antisense Tap expression plasmid
with cell surface marker (e.g. CD4, CD19) expression plasmids into human
cells. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells will be sorted for high
level of surface marker expression (and thus high level of Tap protein or
antisense Tap RNA expression). This population of cells will then be
transfected with reporter construct for CTE function and the effect of
overexpression of Tap protein or antisense Tap RNA will be observed. In
the end, I intend to establish a dependable functional assay for Tap in
CTE-dependent RNA export in mammalian cells.
Our preliminary data suggests that yeast Mex67p does not bind to CTE by
yeast three hybrid assay. As many factors in import/export pathway are
highly conserved between human and yeast, we may have a reasonably good
chance that Tap will retain its ability to function properly in yeast.
Therefore I will try to reconstitute an CTE-dependent RNA export system
in yeast by expressing Tap in it. In a separate experiment, I will use
randomization/selection to identify CTE variants that are able to be
recognized by Mex67p and subsequently examine if Mex67p also can
facilitate export of such an RNA target in yeast or mammalian cells.
e. Fine mapping of Tap-interaction site on CTE and derivation of
a consensus Tap binding site.
I will use chemical interference and footprinting techniques to precisely
map the Tap interaction sites on the CTE. Published data on the
mutagenesis analysis of CTE suggest that the primary sequences of the
internal loops as well as the portions of the stem proximal to the internal
loops are important for CTE function. Mapping of the RNA-protein
interaction sites in these functionally important sequences may provide
another strong evidence that Tap is indeed the genuine cellular cofactor
for CTE function. In vitro or in vivo randomization/selection technique
will be applied to thoroughly study the sequence flexibility of a functional
CTE. These results will enable us to derive a consensus Tap binding
sequence, which will be useful in searching the DNA sequence database for
cellular targets for Tap.
Aim 2. The Tap-CTE export pathway is still largely a black box so far.
Identification of other cellular components of this pathway, especially
the import/export receptors for Tap will be a major subject of future
efforts.
a. Identification of nuclear import/export receptor of Tap.
Initially I will test if Tap interacts with currently known nuclear
import/export receptors by either two-hybrid assay or in vitro binding and
uptake assays. Peptide competition experiments to address the specificity
of such interaction will then be carried out if Tap does use any of these
known import/export receptors. If Tap does not interact with any of the
know import/export receptors I will use yeast two hybrid system in vivo
and affinity column purification technique in vitro to try to identify novel
import/export receptors for Tap. Further biochemical and genetic
characterization will be applied to these receptors.
b. Identification of Tap interacting protein(s).
Even though Tap and Mex67p both are suggested to involve in the nuclear
export of mRNA, no evidence of a direct interaction of these proteins with
cellular mRNA has been presented. A RNA binding protein, Mip6, was
identified through yeast two hybrid system that specifically interacts
with the C-terminal part of yeast Mex67p (Segref et al., 1997). Even
though Tap can directly and specifically binds to CTE, it's still possible
that Tap might not directly interact with cellular mRNA. Instead, it might
enhance the export of cellular mRNA by interacting with a cellular mRNA
binding protein. In addition, the import/export pathways of Tap might be
drastically different from known pathways and require novel cellular
cofactors. Yeast two hybrid and in vivo affinity column purification
techniques will be applied to identify cellular Tap interacting proteins.
Aim 3. Mex67, the yeast homolog of Tap, is involved in nuclear export of
cellular mRNAs (Segref et al., 1997). The role of Tap in cellular mRNA
export is unclear. I plan to test if Tap binds to cellular mRNA in vivo and
subsequently try to identify specific RNA targets that is recognized by
Tap.
a. UV-crossing linking of Tap to cellular RNA. As the initial step to
investigate the cellular role of Tap, I will use UV cross-linking technique
to test if Tap is in close contact with any cellular mRNA. Positive result
will justify further effort to identify these RNA targets.
b. Identification of cellular RNA targets of Tap.
Search of DNA sequence database using CTE as a probe only identify a RNA
sequence within an intracisternal-A particle element in mouse genome
that has high homology to CTE sequence and also functions as a CTE
(Tabernero et al., 1997). It's still possible though that there are other
cellular RNA targets that have low sequence homology to CTE but
nevertheless can be recognized by Tap and play a role in cellular RNA
export. Definition of a consensus Tap binding site in specific aim 1
therefore will be useful for a more complete search of such sequences. An
alternative strategy is to directly identify cellular RNA target for Tap by
virtue of their ability to specifically bind to Tap. The yeast three hybrid
system will be used to identify such cellular RNA target in vivo. Binding
of cellular RNA to immobilized Tap and amplification of these RNA by
differential display RT-PCR is an alternative in vitro approach. After such
RNA targets are identified further experiment will be applied to address
the functional role of such RNA elements.
Reference
Bray, M. , Prasad, S. , Dubay, J.W. , Hunter, E. , Jeang, K.T. , Rekosh, D. and
Hammarskjöld, M.-L. (1994) A small element from the Mason-Pfizer
monkey virus genome makes human immunodeficiency virus type 1
expression and replication Rev-independent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
91, 1256-1260.
Ernst, R.K. , Bray, M. , Rekosh, D. and Hammarskjöld, M.-L. (1997a) A
structured retroviral RNA element that mediates nucleocytoplasmic
export of intron-containing RNA. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 135-144
Ernst, R.K. , Bray, M. , Rekosh, D. and Hammarskjöld, M.-L. (1997b)
Secondary structure and mutational analysis of the Mason-Pfizer
monkey virus constitutive transport element. RNA, 3, 210-222.
Fischer, U. , Huber, J. , Boelens, W.C. , Mattaj, I.W. and Lührmann, R. (1995)
The HIV-1 activation domain is a nuclear export signal that accesses an
export pathway used by specific cellular RNAs. Cell, 82, 475-483.
Gruter, P., Tabernero, C., Kobbe, C., Schmitt, C., Saavedra, C., Bachi, A.,
Wilm, M., Felber, B.K., and Izaurralde, E. (1998) Tap, the human homolog
of Mex67p, mediates CTE-depedent RNA export from the nucleus.
Molecular Cell, 1, 649-659.
Hammarskjöld, M.-L. (1997) Regulation of retroviral RNA export. Semin.
Cell Dev. Biol., 8, 83 90.
Malim, M.H. and Cullen, B.R. (1991) HIV-1 structural gene expression
requires the binding of multiple Rev monomers to the viral RRE:
implications for HIV-1 latency. Mol. Cell. Biol., 65, 241-248
Malim, M.H. , Bohnlein, S. , Hauber, J. and Cullen, B.R. (1989a) Functional
dissection of the HIV-1 Rev trans-activator_derivation of a
trans-dominant repressor of Rev function. Cell, 58, 205-214.
Malim, M.H. , Hauber, J. , Le, S.Y. , Maizel, J.V. and Cullen, B.R. (1989b) The
HIV-1 trans activator acts through a structured target sequence to
activate nuclear export of unspliced viral mRNA. Nature, 338, 254-257.
Meyer, B.E. and Malim, M.H. (1994) The HIV-1 Rev trans-activator shuttles
between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Genes Dev., 8,1538-1547.
Nakielny, S. and Dreyfuss, G. (1997) Nuclear export of proteins and RNAs.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 9, 420-429.
Olsen, H.S. , Cochrane, A.W. , Dillon, P.J. , Nalin, C.M. and Rosen, C.A. (1990)
Interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus type1 Rev protein
with a structured region in the env mRNA is dependent on multimer
formation mediated through a basic stretch of amino acids. Genes Dev.,
4, 1357-1364.
Pasquinelli, A. E., Ernst, R. K., Lund, E., Grimm, C., Zapp, M. L., Rekosh, D.,
Hammarskjold M. L., Dahlberg, J. E. (1997) The constitutive transport
element (CTE) of Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPMV) accesses a cellular
mRNA export pathway. EMBO J., 16, 7500 7510.
Saavedra, C. , Felber, B. and Izaurralde, E. (1997) The constitutive
transport element (CTE) from simian retrovirus-1, unlike the HIV-1
RRE-Rev system, utilises factors required for the export of cellular
mRNAs. Curr. Biol., 7, 619-628.
Segref, A., Sharma, K., Doye, V., Hellwig, A., Huber, J., Luhrmann R., and
Hurt E. (1997) Mex67p, a novel factor for nuclear mRNA export, binds to
both polu(A)+ RNA and nuclear pores. EMBO J., 16, 3256-3271.
Tabernero, C. , Zolotukhin, A.S. , Valentin, A. , Pavlakis, G.N. and Felber, B.K.
(1996) The posttranscriptional control element of the simian
retrovirus type 1 forms an extensive RNA secondary structure
necessary for its function. J. Virol., 70, 5998-6011.
Tabernero, C., Zolotukhin, A. S., Bear, J., Schneider, R., Karsenty, G., Felber,
B. K. (1997) Identification of an RNA sequence within an
intracisternal-A particle element able to replace Rev-mediated
posttranscriptional regulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J Virol., 71, 95-101.
Wen, W. , Meinkoth, J.L. , Tsien, R.Y. and Taylor, S.S. (1995) Identification
of a signal for rapid nuclear export of proteins from the nucleus. Cell,
82, 463-473.
Yoon, D., Lee, H., Seol, W., Demaria, M., Rosenzweig, M., and Jung, J.U. (1997)
Tap: A novel cellular protein that interacts with Tip of Herpesvirus
Saimiri and induces lymphocyte aggregation. Immunity, 6, 571-582.
Zolotukhin, A.S. , Valentin, A. , Pavlakis, G.N. and Felber, B.K. (1994)
Continuous propagation of RRE(-) and Rev(-)RRE(-) human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 molecular clones containing a
cis-acting element of simian retrovirus type 1 in human peripheral
blood lymphocytes. J. Virol., 68, 7944-7952.