Experimental design:
An apparent strategy to identify cellular factors involved in CD4 down
regulation by Nef is selecting mutants that show normal surface CD4 level
even when Nef is constitutively expressed in the cell. However, the diploid
genome of human cells complicates the mutagenesis and selection of this
recessive phenotype. Recently a novel strategy was established that used
regulated antisense RNA initiated within a retrovirus-based gene search
vector to identify previously unknown mammalian autosomal genes whose
homozygous inactivation are associated with a defined recessive phenotype
(34). Application of this strategy has successfully lead to the discovery of a
novel tumor suppressor gene tsg101 that has surprising importance in the
tumorigenesis of human breast cancer (34, 35). A modified strategy is
proposed here to identify genes whose homozygous disruption inactivate the
Nef mediated CD4 down-regulation pathway and restore the normal surface
CD4 level.
The construction of a retroviral gene search vector (pGSV) and a gene search
cell line (GS) is shown in figure 3 and figure 4 respectively. The GS cell line
is derived from human CEM T cell line, which constitutively expresses cell
surface protein CD4 and IL-2 receptor a chain. A Tet-off promoter controlled
Nef expression construct was integrated into genomic DNA and the Nef
expression from this construct can be finely tuned by the adjusting the
concentration of doxycycline in the medium. Regulatory proteins of the
ecdysone-inducible promoter system, which is responsive to the muristerone
A level in the medium, are also constitutively expressed in this cell line.
Both Tet-Off and ecdysone inducible expression systems are highly sensitive
system to regulate gene expression in mammalian system. These system
feature low basal expression/high inducibility and are inert to mammalian
physiology and do not have any pleiotropic effects. The Tet-Off and ecdysone
inducible expression system are commercially available from Clontech Inc.
and Invitrogene Inc. respectively. This cell line will be tested to confirm the
integrity of the regulatory system using transient transfection assay.
pGSV, a Moloney murine leukemia virus-derived retroviral gene search vector
containing the b-geo (36) reporter gene was shown in Figure 4A. This vector
will be introduced into GS cell line, where it will integrate at multiple
chromosomal sites. As the proviral state of the retrovirus contained in pGSV
lacks an enhancer and promoter in its long terminal repeats (LTR) (37),
expression of b-geo in cells containing the provirus is dependent on
transcription directed by the adjacent chromosomal promoter (Figure 4B). An
adenovirus-derived splice acceptor site located 5' to b-geo fuses b-geo mRNA
to exons of chromosomally encoded transcripts. A splicing event that occurs
between chromosomal splice donor site and the splice acceptor site located
at the 5' end of b-geo coding sequences will create a chimeric transcript of
chromosomal exons and b-geo (Figure 2B). Such expression will yield
resistance to the antibiotic G418 and production of b-galactosidase. The
ecdysone-inducible promoter are 5' to the splice acceptor site and in reverse
(antisense) orientation to b-geo; transcription from this promoter can be
activated in trans by muristerone A. The system is designed so that
antisense RNA from the regulated SV40 promoter will inactivate b-geo fusion
transcripts initiated in chromosomal genes that contain the pGSV-derived
provirus and concomitantly will inactivate transcripts from other copies of
these chromosomal genes. Clones in which such homologous gene
inactivation leads to an identifiable phenotype (normal CD4 level in the
presence of Nef) can be isolated form a heterogeneous cell population.
What mutations can we expect that can result in normal CD4 level even
when Nef is expressed in the cell? Some possible mutants with such a
phenotype are summarized in figure 5A. Group A1 has mutations in
cofactor(s) that mediates Nef:CD4 interaction in the cytoplasmic membrane
and group A2 has defects in the Nef-specific portion of the endocytosis and
lysosomal targeting pathway. The purpose of this proposal is to identify
groups A1 and A2 mutants specifically without selecting other groups of
mutants at the same time, even though these other mutations may be
interesting targets for further research. Group B, C and D mutants does not
involved in Nef-mediated CD4 down-regulation pathway. Instead they are
mutants that increase cell surface CD4 level and compensate for the lose of
CD4 caused by Nef down regulation. Therefore these groups of mutants can
be easily distinguished from other mutants by virtue of their abnormally high
level of CD4 when Nef expression is turned off (Figure 5B). Group E mutants
has defects in the possible portion of the endocytosis/degradation pathway
that's common to many other cell surface proteins such as IL-2 receptor a
chain. This group of mutants exhibit higher IL-2Ra level than wild type
cells, which can serves as a unique property to sort out this group of
mutants. Group F mutants has lower level of functional Nef protein properly
targeted onto cytoplasmic membrane. Since Nef protein is expressed from a
introduced expression construct that has no intron, the mutations on the
Nef gene itself is unlikely to occur. Other mutations such as those who
disrupt the myristyolation and targeting of Nef to the cytoplasmic membrane
can be distinguished from group A1 and A2 mutant by their low level of
membrane associated Nef protein.
Figure 6 shows the procedures that will be carried out to identify clones in
which random homologous knockout of a cellular gene results in mutants
whose CD4 level are irresponsive to Nef. GS cells will be infected with
retrovirus particles that are derived from pGSV and produced by helper cells
that harbor genes necessary for viral production and packaging. Cell
expressing b-geo, which contain the provirus integrated at a transcriptionally
active chromosomal site, will be selected from G418 resistance or collected
by florescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) for production of b-galactosidase.
To minimize false positive and increase the selection efficiency and
specificity, two sequential FACSes will be carried out to select a starting
population of cells from b-geo expressing cells for subsequent screening.
The first FACS selects for cells with normal level of IL-2Ra when cells are
grown in muristerone containing medium, therefore eliminates group E
mutants mentioned above. Since retroviral integration disrupt one copy of
the targeted gene even when antisense RNA is not synthesized, some
retroviral insertions in genes whose function is dosage-dependent will cause
a moderate increase of CD4 even though the other copy of the gene is still
functional. Therefore the second FACS will be done to select those cells
with completely or moderately down regulated CD4 in normal medium. This
second FACS will eliminate cells that constitutively express high level of
CD4 in the presence of Nef.
Repeated rounds of three-set FACS selections will then be applied to this
population of cells (see Figure 6 for details). Selection will be repeated
until the enriched population of cells show clear expected surface CD4
profile as those of group A1/A2 mutants shown in Figure 5B. This final
population of selected mutants will then be plated to form colonies.
Initial analysis of each colonies will includes FACS analysis of surface CD4
and IL-2Ra level when the antisense RNA are turn on or off, Northern blot
and Southern blot to confirm integration of retroviral vector into single
genomic site and production of a single fusion transcript. The acid-elution
assay (38) will provide further proof that homologous knockout of these genes
indeed affect the endocytosis of CD4 by Nef, while the CD4 endocytosis
induced by phobol ester is not affected. The expression level of membrane
associated Nef level will also be assessed to eliminate group F mutants.
Gene cloning will be subsequently carried out on those best candidate
colonies by RT-PCR and screening of cDNA library with sequence derived
from RT-PCR product as the probe.
With the sequence of candidate gene at hand, further characterization and
functional study of these genes will follow. Some group A1 candidate gene
product may show co-localization with CD4 and/or Nef in cytoplasmic
membrane. In addition genes will homology to cytoskeleton proteins are
likely candidate as the mediator of Nef:CD4 interaction or the
internalization. For group A2 genes their role in Nef mediated CD4 down
regulation will require more effort to elucidate. In general, the importance
of these genes in CD4 down-regulation can be confirmed by transient
transfection experiments in which high level expression of these gene
increase turnover rate of CD4, while expression of antisense RNA of these
genes will block the down-regulation of CD4 by Nef. Some dominant
negative mutants that can still recognize CD4 or Nef, but are no longer
functional in inducing the endocytosis will serve as useful tools in dissecting
the multiple biological phenotype of Nef.
Discussion
Traditionally the genetic method of identifying mammalian genes associated
with a defined phenotype in cell culture system is mainly depend on "gain of
function" analysis, i.e. introduction of a gene into a system produce a new
phenotype that previously was not observed in that cell line. Such a
method has the advantage of circumventing the difficulty of homologous
mutation in a diploid genome and indeed has produced many successful
examples such as the discovery of HIV entry cofactor Fusin (39). However
this approach has several apparent disadvantages. Sometimes it's impossible
or difficult to obtain a negative-phenotype system to start with. In addition,
it is difficult to analyze phenotypes that require synergistic effect of several
factors simultaneously. With the combination of antisense knockout
technique and efficient recombinant retroviral gene delivery system, the "lose
of function" strategy will provide a valuable alternative for genetic analysis of
cellular function in mammalian system.
Retroviral vectors are becoming a powerful weapon to attack some difficult
questions in the molecular biology of retroviruses (see Figure 7B for another
application of this strategy in searching for HIV-1 Tat cofactor). Still, many
improvement can be made to make these vector more efficient and versatile.
One of the major concerns about the strategy described in this proposal is
the efficiency of "productive" retroviral integration that can produce fusion
transcripts. Whereas retrovirus integration are largely random events,
preference for integration at the 5' ends of functional genes has been
observed (40). Use of the b-geo reporter gene allows cells containing
integrations in transcriptionally active genes to be selected and also allows
monitoring of the effects of antisense RNA on transcripts initiated in the
flanking chromosomal DNA sequence. Reversibility of antisense inhibition
and the CD4 level phenotype was accomplished in these experiments by
ecdysone-inducible promoter. However, there are still some drawbacks about
the application of this retroviral vector. First of all, this method can not
identify genes without intron, even though such genes are rare in
mammalian genome. In additions, small genes and genes that are
unfavorable for retroviral integration will be difficult to identify too. A new
retroviral vector based on transcription of cDNA library cloned in a antisense
orientation, as shown in figure 7A, can be a valuable addition to the arsenal
of gene search retroviral vectors. Such a vector can be produced easily with
only few modifications of a highly efficient cDNA-based retroviral vector that
has been available recently (41). This antisense cDNA-based vector, even
though has the disadvantage in detecting gene with low expression level and
in monitoring of antisense knockout effectiveness, can compensate the
drawbacks of the fusion transcript-based vector.
Homologous knockout of some cellular gene that involves in Nef-mediated
CD4 down-regulation may produce a vital effect on the cell and make such
mutants impossible to isolated. Whereas leaky expression of these genes
by tuning down the strength of ecdysone-inducible promoter can increase the
chance of identifying viable mutants, it will also make the selection less
sensitive. An alternative "gain of function" strategy can be applied here:
expression of Nef in the GS cell line can be titrated to define the threshold
level of Nef from which further increase of Nef expression will no longer
results in subsequent further decrease of cell surface CD4. In such a Nef
saturated cell, the cellular proteins involved in the down-regulation process
will become limiting factors and introduction of a cDNA expression construct
will produce a "super down-regulation" phenotype.
References:
1. Cullen, B. R. (1991). Human immunodeficiency virus as a prototypic
complex retrovirus. J. Virol. 65, 1053-1056.
2. Allan, J. S., Coligan, J. E., Lee, T.-H., MaLane, M. F., Kanki, P. J.,
Groopman, J. E., and Essex, M. (1985). A new HTLV-III/LAV-encoded antigen
detected by antibodies from AIDS patients. Science 230, 810-813.
3. Arya, S. K., Guo, C., Josephs, S. F., and Wong-Staal, F. (1985).
Transacitvator gene of human T-lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III). Science
229, 69-73.
4. Kestler, H. W., Ringer, D. J., Mori, K., Panicali, D. L., Sehgal, P. K.,
Daniel, M. D., and Desrosiers, R. C. (1991). Importance of the nef gene for
maintance of high viral loads and for development of AIDS. Cell 65, 651-662.
5. Deacon, N. J., et al. (1995). Genomic structure of an attenuated quasi
species of HIV-1 from a blood transfusion donor and recipients. Science 270,
988-991.
6. Franchini, G., Robert-Guroff, M., Ghrayeb, J., Chang, N.T., and Wong
Staal, F. (1986). Cytoplasmic localization of the HTLV-III 3' orf protein in
cultured T cells. Virology 155, 593-599.
7. Guatelli, J. C., Gingeras, T. R., and Richman, D.D. (1990). Alternative
splice acceptor utilization during human immunodeficiency virus type 1
infection of cultured cells. J. Virol. 64, 4093-4098.
8. Aiken, C., and Trono, D.(1995). Nef stimulates human immunodeficiency
virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis. J. Virol. 69, 5048-5056.
9. Chowers, M. Y., Spina, C. A., Kowh, T. J., Fitch, N. J. S., Richman, D. D.,
and Guatelli, J. C. (1994). Optimal infectivity in vitro of human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 requires an intact nef gene. J. Virol. 68, 2906
2914.
10. Luciw, P. A., Cheng-Mayer, C., and Levy, J. A. (1987). Mutational analysis
of the human immunodeficiency virus: The orf-B region down-regulations
virus replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:1434-1438.
11. Ryan-Graham, M. A., and Peden, K. W. C. (1995). Both virus and host
components are important for the manifestation of a Nef phenotype in HIV-1
and HIV-2. Virology 213, 158-168.
12. Guy, B., Kieny, M. P., Riviere, Y., Le Peuch, C., Dott, K., Girara, M.,
Montagnier, L., and Lecocq, J. P. (1987). HIV F/3'orf encodes a
phosphorylated GTP-binding protein resembling an oncogene product. Nature
330, 266-269.
13. Benson, R. E., Sanfridson, A., Ottinger, J. S., Doyle, C., and Cullem, B. R.
(1993). Downregulation of cell surface CD4 expression by simian
immunodeficiency virus Nef prevents viral superinfection. J. Exp. Med. 177,
1561-1566.
14. Cullen, B. R. (1994). The role of Nef in the replication cycle of the human
and simian immunodeficiency viruses. Virology 205, 1-6.
15. Goldsmith, M. A., Warmerdam, M. T., Atchison, R. E., Miller, M. D., and
Greene, W. C. (1995). Dissociation of the CD4 downregulation and viral
infectivity enhancement functions of human immunodeficiency virus type 1
Nef. J. Virol. 69, 4112-4121.
16. Saksela, K., Cheng, G., and Baltimore, D. (1995). Proline-rich (PxxP)
motifs in HIV-1 Nef binds to SH3 domain of a subset of Src kinases and are
required for enhanced growth of Nef viruses but not for downregulation of
CD4. EMBO J. 14, 484-489.
17. Skowronski, J., Praks, D., and Mariani, R. (1993). Altered T cell activation
and development in transgenic mice expressing the HIV-1 nef gene. EMBO J.
12, 703-713.
18. Baur, A. S., Sawai, E. T., Dazin, P., Fantl, W. J., Cheng-Mayer, C., and
Peterlin, B. M. (1994). HIV-1 leads to inhibition or activation of T cells
depending on its intracellular localization. Immunity 1, 373-384.
19. Du, Z., Lang, S. M., Sasseville, V. G., Lackner, A. A., Ilyinskii, P. O.,
Daniel, M. D., Jung, J. U., and Desrosiers, R. C. (1995). Identification of a nef
allele that causes lymphocyte activation and acute disease in macaque
monkeys. Cell 82, 665-674.
20. Lafrate, A. J., Bronson, S., and Skowronski, J. (1997). Separable functions
of Nef disrupt two aspects of T cell receptor machinery: CD4 expression and
CD3 signaling. EMBO J. 16, 673-684.
21. Maitra, R. K., Ahmad, N., Holland, S. M., and Venkatesan, S., (1991).
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) provirus expression and LTR
transcription are repressed in Nef-expressing cell lines. Virology 182, 522
533.
22. Schwartz, O., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., Heard, J .-M., and O. Danos.
(1992). Activation pathways and human immunodeficiency virus type 1
replication are not altered in CD+ T cells expressing the Nef protein. AIDS
Res. And Human Retroviruses 8, 545-551.
23. Shin, J., Doyle, C., Yang, Z., Kappes, D., and Strominger, J. L. (1990).
Structural features of the cytoplasmic region of CD4 required for
internalization. EMBO J. 9, 425-434.
24. Pelchen-Matthews, A., Parsons, I. J., and Marsh, M. (1993). Phorbol
ester-induced downregulation of CD4 is a multistep process involving
dissociation from p56lck, increased association with clathrin-coated pits, and
altered endosomal sorting. J. Exp. Med. 178, 1029-1222.
25. Garcia, J. V., Alfano, J., and Miller, A. D. (1993). The negative effect of
human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef on cell surface CD4 expression is
not species specific and requires the cytoplasmic domain of CD4. J. Virol.
67, 1511-1516.
26. Salghetti, S., Mariani, R., and Skowronski, J., (1995). Human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef and p56lck protein-tyrosine kinase interact
with a common element in CD4 cytoplasmic tail. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92, 349-353.
27. Aiken, C., Konner, J., Landau, N., Lenburg, M. E., and Trono, D. (1994).
Nef induces CD4 endocytosis: reguirement for a critical dileucine motif in the
membrane-proximal CD4 cytoplasmic domain. Cell 76, 853-864.
28. Schwartz, O., Marechal, V., Le Gall, S., Lemonnier, F., and Heard, J. -M.
(1996). Endocytosis of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules is
induced by HIV-1 Nef protein. Nature Med. 2, 338-342.
29. Mangasarian, A., Foti, M., Aiken, C., Chin, D., Carpentier, J.-L., and
Trono, D. (1997). The HIV-1 Nef protein acts as a connector with sorting
pathways in the Golgi and at the plasma membrane. Immunity 6, 67-77.
30. Hua, J., Blair, W., Truant, R., and Culle n, B.R. (1997). Identificaiton of
regions in HIV-1 Nef required for efficient downregulation of cell surface
CD4. Virology, in press.
31. Rossi, F., Gallina, A., and Milanesi, G. (1996). Nef-CD4 physical
interaction sensed with the yeast two-hybrid system. Virology 217, 397-403.
32. Harris, M. P. G., and Neil, J. C. (1994). Myristoylation-dependent binding
of HIV-1 Nef to CD4. J. Mol. Biol. 241, 136-142.
33. Grzesiek, S., Stahl, S. J., Wingfield, P. T., and Bax, A. (1996). The CD4
determinant for downregulation by HIV-1 Nef directly binds to Nef: Mapping
of the Nef binding surface by NMR. Biochemistry 1996, 10256-10261.
34. Li, L., and Cohen, S. N. (1996). tsg101: a novel tumor susceptibility gene
isolated by controlled homozygous functional knockout of allelic loci in
mammalian cells. Cell 85, 319-329.
35. Li L., Li X., Francke, U., and Cohen S. N. (1997). The TSG101 tumor
susceptibility gene is located in chromosome 11 band p15 and is mutated in
human breast cancer. Cell 88, 143-54.
36. Friedrich, G., and Soriano, P. (1991). Promoter traps in embryonic stem
cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice.
Genes Dev. 5, 1513-1523.
37. Brenner, D. G., Lin-Chao, S., and Cohen, S. N. (1989). Analysis of
mammalian cell genetic regulation in situ by using retrovirus-derived
"portable exons" carrying Escherichia Coli lacZ gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86, 5517-5521.
38. Pelchen-Matthews, A., Boulet, I., Littman, D. R., Fagard, R., and Marsh,
M. (1992). The protein tyrosine kinases p56lck inhibits CD4 endocytosis by
preventing entry of CD4 into coated pits. J. Cell Biol. 177, 279-290.
39. Feng, Y., Broder, C. C., Kennedy, P.E., Berger E. A. (1996). HIV-1 entry
cofactor: Functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane G protein
coupled receptor. Science 1996 272, 872-877.
40. Rohdewohld, H., Weiher, H., Reik, W., Jaenisch, R., and Breindl, M,
(1987) Retrovirus integration and chromatin structure: Moloney murine
leukemia proviral integration sites map near Dnase-hypersensitive sites. J.
Virol. 61, 336-343.
41. Kitamura, T., Onishi, M., Kinoshita, S., Shibuya, A., Miyajima, A., and
Nolan, G. P. (1995). Efficient screening of retroviral cDNA expression
libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9146-9150.