Exhibition showcases the 'Art of Science'
A panel of distinguished judges has selected the best pieces of art to come out of the University's research labs. Now it's everyone else's turn.
Winners of the 2009 Art of Science competition were announced at a gallery opening in the Friend Center May 8. The show features 48 works chosen from more than 200 submissions and will be on display in the Friend Center atrium for a year.
Judges awarded prizes to three of the works. First prize went to Celeste Nelson, assistant professor of chemical engineering, for "baby squid," an image of squid embryos taken using bright field microscopy. Second prize went to Pat Watson, Mike Gaevski, Joe Palmer and Conrad Sylvestre, technical staff members in Princeton's Micro/Nanofabrication Laboratory, for their entry "Desert Butte," a scanning electron microscope image. Third prize went to Maria Ciocca, a 2005 alumna now a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, for "Worm Love," an image taken using immunofluorescence microscopy.
An online gallery for Princeton's third Art of Science competition went live May 14 and is accompanied by a site that allows members of the public to choose their favorite entry. The voting site is an outgrowth of a sociology and computer science research project at Princeton.
Judges included President Shirley M. Tilghman; Emmet Gowin, an acclaimed photographer and professor of visual arts in the Lewis Center for the Arts; David Dobkin, dean of the faculty and a professor of computer science whose research focuses on computer graphics; and Paul Muldoon, chair of the Lewis Center for the Arts.
The theme of this year's competition was "found art," with the organizers of the exhibition soliciting scientific images created during the course of an actual research project, rather than art inspired by science.
"This show exuberantly supports the idea that images produced in the pursuit of science can have an aesthetic value that is on a par with art created for art's sake," said Andrew Zwicker, the head of science education at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and a lecturer in the Princeton Writing Program.
"We hope that this exhibit will serve as a window through which the wider, nontechnical audience can appreciate and understand the importance of scientific research," said Adam Finkelstein, associate professor of computer science and one of the exhibition organizers.
The top three entrants were awarded cash prizes in amounts calculated by the golden ratio (whose proportions have since antiquity been considered to be aesthetically pleasing): first prize, $250; second prize, $154.51; and third prize, $95.49.
After finishing judging last week, Muldoon said, "It was an invigorating and inspirational experience for me, I must say, to be reminded of the extent to which the structures and patterns of the natural world anticipate the structures and patterns we describe as art. It was particularly striking, too, given the alacrity with which we agreed on the top pieces, to be reminded moreover of how art chooses us rather than our choosing it."
Gowin, who has served as a judge for all three Art of Science competitions, said that it "is always a joy to see and study the amazing images that Art of Science brings together."
"Nature is obliviously full of amazing forms and surprises and so is the human imagination," Gowin said. "It seems to me that the collaboration between photography, in its many forms, and the natural sciences has been of one of the most fruitful meeting places of our modern world. The Art of Science is one of those lovely projects with which we should never be finished."
Dobkin noted that "as in past years, the quality of submissions to the Art of Science exhibit this year made judging almost impossible."
"The committee felt that many of the entries were worthy of recognition, and it was difficult to narrow our selections down to three favorites," said Dobkin. "It will be interesting indeed to see whether the viewing public echoes our choices or offers a different opinion altogether."
The Art of Science "People's Choice" award of $196.53 (the geometric mean of the first and second prizes) will be awarded to the artist of the piece that receives the most online votes by noon July 1.
The Art of Science voting gallery was created by a team headed by Matthew Salganik, an assistant professor of sociology at Princeton. The site builds upon an existing project called Photocracy, which draws on research at the Center for Information Technology Policy combining sociology, systems engineering and theoretical computer science.
"The platform we have built is essentially a suggestion box for the digital age, a tool that will enable groups to collect and then collaboratively evaluate new information such as ideas or photos -- or in this case, the art of science," Salganik said.
Hours for the Art of Science exhibition in the Friend Center atrium are 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. weekdays. It is supported by the Office of the President, the Office of the Dean of the Faculty, the School of Engineering and Applied Science, the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, the Center for Information Technology Policy and the Lewis Center for the Arts.