Bnetd

related topics
{law, state, case}
{system, computer, user}
{game, team, player}
{work, book, publish}
{math, number, function}

bnetd is a software package that was reverse engineered from Blizzard Entertainment's Battle.net online multiplayer gaming service, providing near-complete emulation. The software allows users to create and play on their own servers, instead of Battle.net servers. Released under the terms of the GNU General Public License, bnetd is free software.

Due to a United States lawsuit won by Blizzard against bnetd's original developers, they no longer maintain or host bnetd.

Contents

CD key non-interoperability

Blizzard games are packaged with unique codes. CD keys are entered, but not verified, during the installation process. Connection to battle.net is permitted only with a valid and unique key. Individual keys are regularly disabled by battle.net administrators to block suspected cheaters from battle.net. Players with invalid or disabled keys remain able to play independently of battle.net, such as in single player mode, or through a direct connection to another player.

Blizzard, citing security and piracy concerns on their webpage about emulation, does not allow battle.net to interoperate with bnetd servers to verify CD keys. Because of this, bnetd servers do not implement battle.net's validation. This allows players to access full multiplayer functionality of Battle.net capable games without a valid CD key, by connecting to a bnetd server.

Blizzard takedown demand and lawsuit

In February 2002, Blizzard filed a DMCA safe harbor takedown demand against bnetd with their Internet service provider (ISP). Blizzard subsequently filed suit against the developers of bnetd and their ISP in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The lawsuit alleged copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and violations of their games' End User License Agreement (sometimes referred to as a clickwrap license) and DMCA anti-circumvention prohibitions, in what would become an important test case for portions of that law. The Electronic Frontier Foundation mounted a defense, in which defendants denied copying any portion of battle.net or Blizzard games, denied the validity of the battle.net trademark, denied that CD keys are an anti-piracy measure, and denied that bnetd is a circumvention tool.

In September 2004, the court disagreed and granted summary judgement to Blizzard. On appeal, defendants argued that federal copyright law, which permits reverse engineering, preempts California state contract law, upon which the EULA's prohibition on reverse engineering is grounded.

In September 2005, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the defendants' argument and affirmed the lower court's decision. "Appellants failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the applicability of the interoperability exception [of the DMCA]. The district court properly granted summary judgement in favor of Blizzard and Vivendi on the operability exception." The appeals court further ruled that bnetd circumvents copy protection in violation of the DMCA.[1]

Full article ▸

related documents
Security
Third Amendment to the United States Constitution
Court
Community patent
Court order
Gay panic defense
Freedom of information in the United States
Perjury
Statutory law
Testimony
Geneva Conventions
Butler Act
Jurist
Complaint
Cause of action
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution
Black letter law
Fine (penalty)
Act of Congress
Witness
Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
Customs
Louise Arbour
John N. Mitchell
Consensual crime
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (South Africa)
New Rome, Ohio
Fraser Committee
Shoko Asahara
Indian Reorganization Act