Drug policy of the Netherlands

related topics
{law, state, case}
{disease, patient, cell}
{company, market, business}
{country, population, people}
{government, party, election}
{food, make, wine}
{car, race, vehicle}
{city, large, area}
{day, year, event}
{service, military, aircraft}
{area, part, region}
{album, band, music}
{rate, high, increase}
{war, force, army}
{work, book, publish}
{town, population, incorporate}

The drug policy of the Netherlands officially has four major objectives:

Most policymakers in the Netherlands believe that if a problem has proved to be unsolvable, it is better to try controlling it and reducing harm instead of continuing to enforce laws with mixed results. By contrast, most other countries take the point of view that recreational drug use is detrimental to society and must therefore be outlawed. This has caused friction between the Netherlands and other countries about the policy for cannabis, most notably with France and Germany. As of 2004, Belgium seems to be moving toward the Dutch model and a few local German legislators are calling for experiments based on the Dutch model. Switzerland has had long and heated parliamentary debates about whether to follow the Dutch model on cannabis, most recently deciding against it in 2004; currently a ballot initiative is in the works on the question. In the last few years certain strains of cannabis with higher concentrations of THC and drug tourism have challenged the current policy and led to a re-examination of the current approach.[2]

While the legalization of cannabis remains controversial, the introduction of heroin-assisted treatment in 1998 has been lauded for considerably improving the health and social situation of opiate-dependent patients in the Netherlands.[3] In 2010 research shows that the "heroin-junkies" have disappeared from the streets of the Netherlands and the treatment is upgraded from a test-trial to standard treatment for otherwise untreatable addicts. Also number of heroin addicts has dropped by more than 30% since 1983.

Contents

Public health

Large-scale dealing, production, import and export are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, even if it does not supply end users or coffeeshops with more than the allowed amounts. Exactly how coffeeshops get their supplies is rarely investigated, however. The average concentration of THC in the cannabis sold in coffeeshops has increased from 9% in 1998 to 18% in 2005.[4] One of the reasons is plant breeding and use of greenhouse technology for illegal growing of cannabis in Netherlands.[4] The former minister of Justice Piet Hein Donner announced in June 2007 that cultivation of cannabis shall continue to be illegal.

Full article ▸

related documents
Indemnity
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Adversarial system
Interrogatories
Civil procedure
Statute of frauds
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Punitive damages
Citation signal
Advocate
Scientology and the legal system
State supreme court
Arrest warrant
Mootness
European Court of Justice
Expert witness
United States Marshals Service
Vexatious litigation
Volkert van der Graaf
Acceptable use policy
Internal Revenue Service
Res ipsa loquitur
Search warrant
Mumia Abu-Jamal
Laws of war
Baker v. Vermont
Posse Comitatus Act
United States Code
Summary offence
Babylonian law