Standard extreme value theory
implies that the distribution of the largest observations of a large
cross section is well approximated by a parametric model, governed by a
location, scale and shape parameter. The extremes of a panel of
independent cross sections are all governed by the same parameters as
long as the underlying distribution as well as the size of the cross
sections are time invariant. We derive inference about these
parameters, and tests of the null hypothesis of time invariance, under
asymptotics that do not require the number of extremes or the number of
time periods to increase. We further apply Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
techniques to estimate the path of time-varying parameters. We
illustrate the approach in four examples of U.S. data: damages from
weather-related disasters, financial returns, city sizes andfirm sizes.
We show, using three empirical
applications, that linear regression estimates which rely on the
assumption of sparsity are fragile in two ways. First, we document that
different choices of the regressor matrix that don't impact ordinary
least squares (OLS) estimates, such as the choice of baseline category
with categorical controls, can move sparsity-based estimates two
standard errors or more. Second, we develop two tests of the sparsity
assumption based on comparing sparsity-based estimators with OLS. The
tests tend to reject the sparsity assumption in all three applications.
Unless the number of regressors is comparable to or exceeds the sample
size, OLS yields more robust results at little efficiency cost.
This paper proposes a model for, and investigates the consequences of, strong spatial dependence in economic variables. Our approach and findings echo those of the corresponding "unit root" time series literature: We suggest a model for spatial I(1) processes, and establish a functional central limit theorem that justifies a large sample Gaussian process approximation for such processes. We further generalize the I(1) model to a spatial "local-to-unity" model that exhibits weak mean reversion. We characterize the large sample behavior of regression inference with spatial I(1) variables, and establish that spurious regression is as much a problem with spatial I(1) data as it is with time series I(1) data. We develop asymptotically valid spatial unit root tests, stationarity tests, and inference methods for the local-to-unity parameter. Finally, we consider strategies for valid inference in regressions with persistent (I(1) or local-to-unity) spatial data, such as spatial analogues of first-differencing transformations.
Low-Frequency Analysis of Economic Time Series. (Joint with MARK WATSON.) Draft chapter for Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 7, edited by S. Durlauf, L.P. Hansen, J.J. Heckman, and R. Matzkin.We propose a Bayesian procedure for exploiting small, possibly long-lag linear predictability in the innovations of a finite order autoregression. We model the innovations as having a log-spectral density that is a continuous mean-zero Gaussian process of order 1/sqrt(T). This local embedding makes the problem asymptotically a normal-normal Bayes problem, resulting in closed-form solutions for the best forecast. When applied to data on 132 U.S. monthly macroeconomic time series, the method is found to improve upon autoregressive forecasts by an amount consistent with the theoretical and Monte Carlo calculations.
Forthcoming and Published PapersRefining the Central Limit Theorem Approximation via Extreme Value Theory, Statistics & Probability Letters 155 (2019), 1 – 7.
Nearly Weighted Risk Minimal Unbiased Estimation, Journal of Econometrics, 209 (2019), 18 – 34. (Joint with YULONG WANG.) Replication files. Slides.
Long-Run Covariability, Econometrica 86 (2018), 775 – 804. Mark Watson’s Fisher-Schultz lecture 2016. (Joint with MARK WATSON.) Appendix and Replication files. Slides.
Low-Frequency Econometrics. In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Eleventh World Congress of the Econometric Society, Volume II, ed. by B. Honoré, and L. Samuelson, Cambridge University Press (2017), 53 – 94. (Joint with MARK WATSON.) Replication files. Slides.
Fixed-k Asymptotic Inference about Tail Properties, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112 (2017), 1334 – 1343. (Joint with YULONG WANG.) Replication files. Slides.
Credibility of Confidence Sets in Nonstandard Econometric Problems, Econometrica 84 (2016), 2183 – 2213. (Joint with ANDRIY NORETS.) Supplementary Appendix. Slides.
Measuring Uncertainty about Long-Run Predictions, Review of Economic Studies 83 (2016), 1711 – 1740. (Joint with MARK WATSON.) Supplementary Appendix. Replication files. Slides.
Coverage Inducing Priors in Nonstandard Inference Problems, Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (2016), 1233 – 1241. (Joint with ANDRIY NORETS.) Supplementary Appendix.
Inference with Few Heterogenous Clusters, Review of Economics and Statistics 98 (2016), 83 – 96. (Joint with RUSTAM IBRAGIMOV.) Supplementary Appendix. Replication files. Slides.
Nearly Optimal Tests when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Under the Null Hypothesis, Econometrica 83 (2015), 771 – 811. (Joint with GRAHAM ELLIOTT and MARK WATSON.) Supplementary Appendix. Replication files. Slides.
HAC Corrections for Strongly Autocorrelated Time Series, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 32 (2014), 311 – 322. Comments and Rejoinder. Slides.
Pre and Post Break Parameter Inference, Journal of Econometrics 180 (2014), 141 – 157. (Joint with GRAHAM ELLIOTT.) 2012 working paper version. Slides.
Risk of Bayesian Inference in Misspecified Models, and the Sandwich Covariance Matrix, Econometrica 81 (2013), 1805 – 1849. Slides.
Low-Frequency Robust Cointegration Testing, Journal of Econometrics 174 (2013), 66 – 81. (Joint with MARK WATSON.) Slides.
Measuring Prior Sensitivity and Prior Informativeness in Large Bayesian Models, Journal of Monetary Economics 59 (2012), 581 – 597. Slides. Supplementary Appendix.
Efficient Tests under a Weak Convergence Assumption, Econometrica 79 (2011), 395 – 435. (Formerly circulated under the title "An Alternative Sense of Asymptotic Efficiency".) Slides.
Efficient
Estimation of the Parameter Path in Unstable Time Series Models, Review
of
Economic Studies 77 (2010), 1508 – 1539. (Joint with PHILIPPE-EMMANUEL
PETALAS.) Supplement. Correction. Slides.
t-statistic Based Correlation and Heterogeneity Robust Inference, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 28 (2010), 453 – 468. (Joint with RUSTAM IBRAGIMOV.) Supplement. Slides.
Valid Inference in Partially Unstable GMM Models, Review of Economic Studies 76 (2009), 343 – 365. (Joint with HONG LI.) Slides.
Testing Models of Low-Frequency Variability, Econometrica 76 (2008), 979 – 1016. (Joint with MARK WATSON.) Slides.
The Impossibility of Consistent Discrimination between I(0) and I(1) Processes, Econometric Theory 24 (2008), 616 – 630. Slides.
A Theory of Robust Long-Run Variance Estimation, Journal of Econometrics 141 (2007), 1331 – 1352. (Substantially different 2004 working paper).
Confidence Sets for the Date of a Single Break in Linear Time Series Regressions, Journal of Econometrics 141 (2007), 1196 – 1218. (Joint with GRAHAM ELLIOTT.)
Minimizing the Impact of the Initial Condition on Testing for Unit Roots, Journal of Econometrics 135 (2006), 285 – 310. (Joint with GRAHAM ELLIOTT.)Efficient Tests for General Persistent Time Variation in Regression Coefficients, Review of Economic Studies 73 (2006), 907 – 940. Formerly circulated under the title “Optimally Testing General Breaking Processes in Linear Time Series Models”. (Joint with GRAHAM ELLIOTT.)
Are Forecasters Reluctant to Revise their Predictions? Some German Evidence, Journal of Forecasting 25 (2006), 401 – 413. (Joint with GEBHARD KIRCHGÄSSNER.)
Size and Power of Tests for Stationarity in Highly Autocorrelated Time Series, Journal of Econometrics 128 (2005), 195 – 213.
Tests for Unit Roots and the Initial Condition, Econometrica 71 (2003), 1269 – 1286. (Joint with GRAHAM ELLIOTT.)
Ecological Tax Reform and Involuntary Unemployment: Simulation Results for Switzerland, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 134 (1998), 329 – 359. (Joint with GEBHARD KIRCHGÄSSNER and MARCEL SAVIOZ.)Comment on “HAR Inference: Recommendations for Practice” by E. Lazarus, D. J. Lewis and J. H. Stock, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 36 (2018), 563 – 564.
Comment on “Unit Root Testing in Practice: Dealing with Uncertainty over the Trend and Initial Condition” by D. I. Harvey, S. J. Leybourne and A. M. R. Taylor, Econometric Theory 25 (2009), 643 – 648.